Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Bozo is not a big believer in these sex studies. But if true, it just seems to confirm the obvious: Bigger is better.

"Schlong story short: Women rated men who were taller with a V-shaped upper body and larger penis more attractive. However, there was a point where a further increase in penis size or height had diminishing value."

NYPOST.COM

200 female participants rated computer-generated male figures that varied in height, body shape, and penis size.

BTC
🤡

Posted (edited)

Ancestral female sexual satisfaction did not figure prominently in mate selection. Just ask Wilma and Betty. Also the relative proportion of penis bone to penis corpus cavernosum varies among primates, and it may be that the higher proportion of vascular tissue relative to bone in the human male penis naturally selected for larger size in order to improve genital stability during intercourse, etc. Bigger dicks require less backbone. Perhaps this also tracks somewhat with penile rod implant procedures.

Edited by SirBillybob
Posted
19 hours ago, mtaabq said:

I can’t speak for anyone else, but I really don’t give a sh*t about what women want. Or how they rate men. If they want a big d*ck, they are welcome to go find one just like the rest of us. 😀

Shot? Duck? Sounds like intro figure skating move ‘shoot the duck’, likely not malininized for Cortina. 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, SirBillybob said:

Ancestral female sexual satisfaction did not figure prominently in mate selection. Just ask Wilma and Betty. Also the relative proportion of penis bone to penis corpus cavernosum varies among primates, and it may be that the higher proportion of vascular tissue relative to bone in the human male penis naturally selected for larger size in order to improve genital stability during intercourse, etc. Bigger dicks require less backbone. Perhaps this also tracks somewhat with penile rod implant procedures.

Penis bone? I think my ancestors lost that one awhile ago. 
Maybe some of the bears here still have one. 

Edited by Nue2thegame
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, Nue2thegame said:

Penis bone? I think my ancestors … 

That’s what I was getting at. U know the bear facts. They don’t give anyone a boner. I just didn’t add that the bone to vascular tissue ratio is 0:100. It ends at the pubic bone. That is still relative as indicated. 

Was it lost? IDK the evolutionary trajectory. I suppose that penile rods approximate other primates’ penis bone structure. 

Edited by SirBillybob

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...