+ BOZO T CLOWN Posted Saturday at 07:01 PM Posted Saturday at 07:01 PM Bozo is not a big believer in these sex studies. But if true, it just seems to confirm the obvious: Bigger is better. "Schlong story short: Women rated men who were taller with a V-shaped upper body and larger penis more attractive. However, there was a point where a further increase in penis size or height had diminishing value." Women do find men with big penises more attractive, academic study... NYPOST.COM 200 female participants rated computer-generated male figures that varied in height, body shape, and penis size. BTC 🤡 + SirBillybob 1
mtaabq Posted Saturday at 07:26 PM Posted Saturday at 07:26 PM I can’t speak for anyone else, but I really don’t give a sh*t about what women want. Or how they rate men. If they want a big d*ck, they are welcome to go find one just like the rest of us. 😀 thomas, + Pensant, + Vegas_Millennial and 5 others 1 7
+ SirBillybob Posted Sunday at 02:35 PM Posted Sunday at 02:35 PM (edited) Ancestral female sexual satisfaction did not figure prominently in mate selection. Just ask Wilma and Betty. Also the relative proportion of penis bone to penis corpus cavernosum varies among primates, and it may be that the higher proportion of vascular tissue relative to bone in the human male penis naturally selected for larger size in order to improve genital stability during intercourse, etc. Bigger dicks require less backbone. Perhaps this also tracks somewhat with penile rod implant procedures. Edited Sunday at 02:43 PM by SirBillybob
+ SirBillybob Posted Sunday at 03:04 PM Posted Sunday at 03:04 PM 19 hours ago, mtaabq said: I can’t speak for anyone else, but I really don’t give a sh*t about what women want. Or how they rate men. If they want a big d*ck, they are welcome to go find one just like the rest of us. 😀 Shot? Duck? Sounds like intro figure skating move ‘shoot the duck’, likely not malininized for Cortina. mtaabq 1
Nue2thegame Posted Sunday at 04:07 PM Posted Sunday at 04:07 PM (edited) 1 hour ago, SirBillybob said: Ancestral female sexual satisfaction did not figure prominently in mate selection. Just ask Wilma and Betty. Also the relative proportion of penis bone to penis corpus cavernosum varies among primates, and it may be that the higher proportion of vascular tissue relative to bone in the human male penis naturally selected for larger size in order to improve genital stability during intercourse, etc. Bigger dicks require less backbone. Perhaps this also tracks somewhat with penile rod implant procedures. Penis bone? I think my ancestors lost that one awhile ago. Maybe some of the bears here still have one. Edited Sunday at 04:08 PM by Nue2thegame
+ SirBillybob Posted Sunday at 04:27 PM Posted Sunday at 04:27 PM (edited) 31 minutes ago, Nue2thegame said: Penis bone? I think my ancestors … That’s what I was getting at. U know the bear facts. They don’t give anyone a boner. I just didn’t add that the bone to vascular tissue ratio is 0:100. It ends at the pubic bone. That is still relative as indicated. Was it lost? IDK the evolutionary trajectory. I suppose that penile rods approximate other primates’ penis bone structure. Edited Sunday at 04:39 PM by SirBillybob
samhexum Posted Sunday at 06:02 PM Posted Sunday at 06:02 PM 3 hours ago, SirBillybob said: Bigger dicks require less backbone. Is that a moral judgement/observation?
+ SirBillybob Posted Sunday at 06:16 PM Posted Sunday at 06:16 PM 12 minutes ago, samhexum said: Is that a moral judgement/observation? I haven’t observed bigger dicks to make an impression. Perhaps there will eventually be moral of them to judge.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now