Rentmen reviews

[Reggyreg56]

Does anyone else question some of the 5 star reviews on the site? I mean I find it hard to believe that some providers have ALL 5's! It makes it hard to take reviews seriously. Am I missing something? 

[savantsav]

rentment actively denies anything that's not 5 stars. If you review with a 5 star the review is approved almost within the hour, if you have anything less than 5 stars they message you 3 days later asking for proof of the meet, then they get back to you 3 days later saying it wasn't enough and deny your review. One time they answered to me 4 days later asking for proof, I provided proof (screenshots), then they replied to me 3 days later saying that it had been a week since we had met and the review must've been made within the first 72 hours (which I did, it took them 4 days to get back to me) and then denied it.

Don't trust reviews on RM. Trust them here. Always. Remember, you may pay a $45 membership, but providers are spending hundreds on their classified AND the 'gold' 'platinum' etc extras. Clients are not the moneymaker for rentment, providers are and as such they'll guard that income over ours.

Edited Tuesday at 06:42 PM by savantsav

[Reggyreg56]

17 minutes ago, savantsav said:

rentment actively denies anything that's not 5 stars. If you review with a 5 star the review is approved almost within the hour, if you have anything less than 5 stars they message you 3 days later asking for proof of the meet, then they get back to you 3 days later saying it wasn't enough and deny your review. One time they answered to me 4 days later asking for proof, I provided proof (screenshots), then they replied to me 3 days later saying that it had been a week since we had met and the review must've been made within the first 72 hours (which I did, it took them 4 days to get back to me) and then denied it.

Don't trust reviews on RM. Trust them here. Always. Remember, you may pay a $45 membership, but providers are spending hundreds on their classified AND the 'gold' 'platinum' etc extras. Clients are not the moneymaker for rentment, providers are and as such they'll guard that income over ours.

Thank you for that great response. I didn't realize how difficult it is to leave a review that's less than 5 stars! It makes you wonder how many of these escorts really provide a great service!

[Venite]

I suspect providers protest the reviews that are under 5 stars. Yes, reviews may be questionable  when they are just a handful, but in my experience, a guy with many 5-stars reviews (especially when they’re not from the same person) tends to be a good experience.

[Reggyreg56]

That makes sense as well. Clients pay a lot of money for a great experience and it is a bad feeling when a provider doesn't live up to the "hype." 

[sizeKing]

5 minutes ago, Venite said:

I suspect providers protest the reviews that are under 5 stars. Yes, reviews may be questionable  when they are just a handful, but in my experience, a guy with many 5-stars reviews (especially when they’re not from the same person) tends to be a good experience.

Agree on that. Almost always having a good experience with a provider who has consistent positive reviews on RM from different reviewers.

[NYXboy]

1 hour ago, Reggyreg56 said:

Does anyone else question some of the 5 star reviews on the site? I mean I find it hard to believe that some providers have ALL 5's! It makes it hard to take reviews seriously. Am I missing something? 

I only leave a review when it was a 5 star experience. If it was just so-so I say nothing. 

I once left a poor review from a provider who had outdated pics and stole from me, he updated his pics and so then rentmen took the review down. I was furious and back and forth with rentmen went on until they finally put the review back up. 

The provider sent me my money back and I then deleted the review in exchange. 

I think it's best to check rentmen reviews, but also reviews here. 

[TJMS]

I think the rentmen reviews, provided you can view the written comments, are helpful. I generally check the other providers the reviewer has seen for consistency. I only went with one provider that did not have any comments here, but the comments on rentmen were from experienced clients with  a track record.  Fortunately, that one worked out for me.  

[Reggyreg56]

31 minutes ago, NYXboy said:

I only leave a review when it was a 5 star experience. If it was just so-so I say nothing. 

I once left a poor review from a provider who had outdated pics and stole from me, he updated his pics and so then rentmen took the review down. I was furious and back and forth with rentmen went on until they finally put the review back up. 

The provider sent me my money back and I then deleted the review in exchange. 

I think it's best to check rentmen reviews, but also reviews here. 

Wow I can't believe a provider would still from you but I guess it's not surprising. I meet my first provider from Rentmen on Saturday and I am nervous! Lol

[Reggyreg56]

18 minutes ago, TJMS said:

I think the rentmen reviews, provided you can view the written comments, are helpful. I generally check the other providers the reviewer has seen for consistency. I only went with one provider that did not have any comments here, but the comments on rentmen were from experienced clients with  a track record.  Fortunately, that one worked out for me.  

I am so glad you had a pleasant experience.

[BuzzLiteQueer]

1 hour ago, Reggyreg56 said:

Wow I can't believe a provider would still from you but I guess it's not surprising. I meet my first provider from Rentmen on Saturday and I am nervous! Lol

I'm surprised, if not shocked, that a low-life provider like the one described BY @NYXboywould refund the client's money!

[56harrisond]

Often discussed

 

[56harrisond]

 

[NYXboy]

10 minutes ago, BuzzLiteQueer said:

I'm surprised, if not shocked, that a low-life provider like the one described BY @NYXboywould refund the client's money!

he wanted his bad review here and on RM taken down. I believe him when he said he learned a valuable lesson. 

[Danny-Darko]

I've also noticed that many if not most reviews, have the same wording from each particular escort. Which leads me to believe that it just might be the same person over and over giving the reviews! Or might be a repeat customer or an infatuated one that every so often writes another review. Or even it might even be the escort himself or a friend of his, who knows?! I do read them, but I'm VERY skeptical of them.  

Once  many years ago I tried to leave a review for an escort that was shady and RM refused to publish it saying that they could not determine that we had actually met! The escort contested it and after sending me a sassy message blocked me. So that goes to show who's side RM is really on. HooBoy decades ago started this forum because there was no honest or verifiable way to know who was good and those not in the early days of the internet. After his untimely demise of a second heart attach or stroke (can't remember which), the whole concept and format of the forum when to hell in handbasket. The new administrator who took over the site's personal reviews seemed not being very credible. Enough said, I won't go into details.

So here we are today depending on each other for feedback. I am grateful though that this site is still around after this long and passing through different administrators.    RM is just to be used as a cataloged of advertising men, and like with most products "mileage and experience may vary" and not everything that's written is to be believed.    

Edited Tuesday at 10:23 PM by Danny-Darko

[+ glutes]

I think both Rentmen and Rentmassuers 'reviews' are written by AI. Way too lengthy and complimentary.

Net-net, I don't trust them, and go by the comments made here by established embers.

[DMonDude]

2 hours ago, NYXboy said:

I think it's best to check rentmen reviews, but also reviews here. 

Agreed. I've used both.

@Reggyreg56 The issues others have pointed out can be true for RM reviews, but there are other scenarios where you do need the RM reviews. For one, not every user on RM is on this forum and not every provider on RM has been reviewed on this forum. There inherently are gaps in review coverage just by the sheer disparity in the amount of overall clients using RM versus how many clients are also members of this forum. RM reviews can be perfectly usable by looking at the details others in the thread have mentioned like checking how old other reviewers/clients profiles are, if they made their profile around the same time as when the provider did, if the reviewers all left reviews in the same week a provider for example or if their only review is the provider you are considering and they don't have a record of reviewing other providers over a period of time.

I've also messaged fellow clients on RM the same way I'd post a 411 thread or DM a user here to ask about a provider and that's worked out well for me. You can usually tell by how/if they reply if they're fake or not. Exclusively using the reviews here and ignoring all RM reviews drastically shrinks your own provider choices on RM because plenty of good providers have not been reviewed here yet, so sometimes you just need to take the chance yourself. Especially if you like a type of guy/provider that isn't the usual type most on this forum go for or it's a provider who simply isn't paying the Premium/Gold/Platinum subscription and thus just doesn't have as many eyes on their profile. Then you're even more less likely to find reviews for those guys here. About half of my past hires have been guys with no reviews on this forum and all but one of those were a good experience because i used due diligence with what was available on RM.

You can make it work for you, it just takes more work and precaution. I've noticed a lot of the RM reviews are often being left by people where English isn't their first language, especially for providers who are multi-lingual. And it contributes to some of their reviews sounding fishy or weird. It's not that they're AI or fake, it's that they're trying to be complimentary in a second or third language while also not being overly descriptive of the encounter because both RM sites try to implore reviewers not to be too explicit in reviews (which some people ignore) because they're still trying to keep some guise of this not being what it is. I say all this to say, yes don't take every RM review at face value, but they can still be useful if you know how to parse them correctly. The "don't trust RM reviews ever because it's all bots/AI" is a tad bit of an over simplification. This forum has no better defenses against AI/bots or providers setting up fake accounts than RM does, if we're being realistic (it's even less considering we don't have to pay to make accounts here like you do on RM to be able to leave a review), so it's just good to be cautious and more discerning all around.

Edited Tuesday at 10:38 PM by DMonDude

[BigK]

40 minutes ago, Danny-Darko said:

I've also noticed that many if not most reviews, have the same wording from each particular escort. Which leads me to believe that it just might be the same person over and over giving the reviews! Or might be a repeat customer or an infatuated one that every so often writes another review. Or even it might even be the escort himself or a friend of his, who knows?! I do read them, but I'm VERY skeptical of them.  .    

Well, it’s possible that a singular person could be writing many reviews rent Men, at least, doesn’t make it that easy.

RM won’t post review unless there has been messages exchanged on RM messenger between the reviewer and the escort.  So Indeed a singular person could create multiple RM Accounts, but they would have to use a VPN.

[NYXboy]

I had someone message me on RM to ask about a review I left and it annoyed me and it annoys me here too. 

I replied the same way I do here - 'why would I leave a 5 star review confirming the pics were real and I enjoyed myself if that wasn't the case.'

I am not obligated to give blow by blow accounts to some stranger online. Saying that I have reached out to people who left bad reviews - I just wanted to confirm if it was because of chemistry or drugs or maybe they were 5 minutes late. some of those things I find more offensive than others. 

Edited Tuesday at 10:48 PM by NYXboy

[DMonDude]

5 minutes ago, NYXboy said:

I had someone message me on RM to ask about a review I left and it annoyed me and it annoys me here too. 

I replied the same way I do here - 'why would I leave a 5 star review confirming the pics were real and I enjoyed myself if that wasn't the case.'

I am not obligated to give blow by blow accounts to some stranger online. Saying that I have reached out to people who left bad reviews - I just wanted to confirm if it was because of chemistry or drugs or maybe they were 5 minutes late. some of those things I find more offensive than others. 

I think you're being a little needlessly difficult/not helpful with your response to people reaching out to you, with all due respect. I've reached out to people who have left positive and negative reviews. You don't necessarily have to give the blow by blow of every act you did with the provider, but sometimes people just want confirmation of how it went and what it was actually like to interact with the provider because "the pics were real and i had a good time" doesn't really tell you much about the actual experience.

When i reach out to people i want to know how easy was it to set up the meet, was the place they hosted in nice or in a good area with parking (i once was told by a fellow client a very well reviewed provider was great in bed but his apartment was a pig stye, which was not listed in the 5 star review). There are all these intangibles to the experience (even if it's a good one) that no one is actually putting into their reviews and that's what they're actually asking you for. Seems like a silly thing to be annoyed by, especially when you said you still do the same thing but only to people who left negative reviews.

[Cretus]

I think there are some exaggerations being made here lol. “Most reviews having the same wording over and over” seems like a stretch, along with reviews being written by AI lol

 

[NYXboy]

4 minutes ago, DMonDude said:

When i reach out to people i want to know how easy was it to set up the meet, was the place they hosted in nice or in a good area with parking (i once was told by a fellow client a very well reviewed provider was great in bed but his apartment was a pig stye, which was not listed in the 5 star review).

I would say the time is probably better spent reaching out to the provider with those questions.  I would never leave a good review if the place was not clean and the RM reviews specifically ask about the ambiance. 

[Nue2thegame]

1 hour ago, Danny-Darko said:

I've also noticed that many if not most reviews, have the same wording from each particular escort. Which leads me to believe that it just might be the same person over and over giving the reviews! Or might be a repeat customer or an infatuated one that every so often writes another review. Or even it might even be the escort himself or a friend of his, who knows?! I do read them, but I'm VERY skeptical of them.  

 

I’ve noticed the same thing and was also skeptical. However, I realized a while ago that I’ve been guilty of the same offense. After reading previous reviews before offering my own, I apparently was subliminally co-opting some of their language as my own. I now read all reviews with a jaundiced eye. Even when I’ve read reviews from people that I know and trust, I’ve occasionally had a completely different experience. Call it chemistry or YMMV. 

[Reggyreg56]

46 minutes ago, DMonDude said:

Agreed. I've used both.

@Reggyreg56 The issues others have pointed out can be true for RM reviews, but there are other scenarios where you do need the RM reviews. For one, not every user on RM is on this forum and not every provider on RM has been reviewed on this forum. There inherently are gaps in review coverage just by the sheer disparity in the amount of overall clients using RM versus how many clients are also members of this forum. RM reviews can be perfectly usable by looking at the details others in the thread have mentioned like checking how old other reviewers/clients profiles are, if they made their profile around the same time as when the provider did, if the reviewers all left reviews in the same week a provider for example or if their only review is the provider you are considering and they don't have a record of reviewing other providers over a period of time.

I've also messaged fellow clients on RM the same way I'd post a 411 thread or DM a user here to ask about a provider and that's worked out well for me. You can usually tell by how/if they reply if they're fake or not. Exclusively using the reviews here and ignoring all RM reviews drastically shrinks your own provider choices on RM because plenty of good providers have not been reviewed here yet, so sometimes you just need to take the chance yourself. Especially if you like a type of guy/provider that isn't the usual type most on this forum go for or it's a provider who simply isn't paying the Premium/Gold/Platinum subscription and thus just doesn't have as many eyes on their profile. Then you're even more less likely to find reviews for those guys here. About half of my past hires have been guys with no reviews on this forum and all but one of those were a good experience because i used due diligence with what was available on RM.

You can make it work for you, it just takes more work and precaution. I've noticed a lot of the RM reviews are often being left by people where English isn't their first language, especially for providers who are multi-lingual. And it contributes to some of their reviews sounding fishy or weird. It's not that they're AI or fake, it's that they're trying to be complimentary in a second or third language while also not being overly descriptive of the encounter because both RM sites try to implore reviewers not to be too explicit in reviews (which some people ignore) because they're still trying to keep some guise of this not being what it is. I say all this to say, yes don't take every RM review at face value, but they can still be useful if you know how to parse them correctly. The "don't trust RM reviews ever because it's all bots/AI" is a tad bit of an over simplification. This forum has no better defenses against AI/bots or providers setting up fake accounts than RM does, if we're being realistic (it's even less considering we don't have to pay to make accounts here like you do on RM to be able to leave a review), so it's just good to be cautious and more discerning all around.

Thank you so much. You have made many great points and gave me a perspective I never considered. Reviews are not an exact science and I think I will need to rely on "trail and error." I am meeting a provider on Saturday and everyone who has met him have reviewed him favorably. I will keep my fingers crossed! Lol. Thanks again!

[Danny-Darko]

39 minutes ago, BigK said:

Well, it’s possible that a singular person could be writing many reviews rent Men, at least, doesn’t make it that easy.

RM won’t post review unless there has been messages exchanged on RM messenger between the reviewer and the escort.  So Indeed a singular person could create multiple RM Accounts, but they would have to use a VPN.

What I meant was similar patterns on the same escort. I didn't mean to imply that the same person wrote for different escorts.