Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Now in NYC with one 1-star review.  Reviewer comment:  "Santos was unprofessional and completely uninterested. Worst of all, he stole from me during our session. I realized money was missing right after he left, and he ignored my messages. Stay away!"

Edited by dutchal
Posted
39 minutes ago, dutchal said:

Now in NYC with one 1-star review.  Reviewer comment:  "Santos was unprofessional and completely uninterested. Worst of all, he stole from me during our session. I realized money was missing right after he left, and he ignored my messages. Stay away!"

One man's sip of wine can be another man's drought of vinegar. That stated, I will make inquiry of the provider as to his side of the story. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, robberbaron4u said:
59 minutes ago, dutchal said:

Now in NYC with one 1-star review.  Reviewer comment:  "Santos was unprofessional and completely uninterested. Worst of all, he stole from me during our session. I realized money was missing right after he left, and he ignored my messages. Stay away!"

One man's sip of wine can be another man's drought of vinegar. That stated, I will make inquiry of the provider as to his side of the story. 

So very 2025: A robber baron becomes the police, judge, and jury to determine guilt.

  • 2 months later...
Posted
On 4/10/2025 at 9:09 AM, robberbaron4u said:

I will make inquiry of the provider as to his side of the story.

Did you? And if so, what's your astute conclusion?

Posted
4 hours ago, jeezopete said:

Did you? And if so, what's your astute conclusion?

I had a conversation with the gentleman who brought him to my attention. By him, the provider arrived at the appointed place to find not only the client but the client's "friend" who, too, expected use of the provider. "Two for one" was not part of the agreed upon hire. Upon the provider declining the hire, the client and his friend"got rough" with him. The provider came to my acquaintance immediately after the incident to seek assistance and a black eye and bruising was noted with the provider. As my acquaintance knew the client, indeed he had recommended the provider to the client and he lent credibility in the thing to the provider not the client, I dismiss the referenced review as "suspect", an effort, perhaps, by the client to deflect liability on his part on to the provider.

Posted

apart from the single questionable/disputed negative review, the two other RM reviews are from longtime "premium" members......RM reviews are traditionally difficult to rely upon, but little clues like this lend credibility

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...