Jump to content
This topic is 931 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

So this provider created a page in September and he's been logging into it on a regular basis. There just is no way to contact him as he has no phone # listed and has disabled instant messages. I've been checking his ad a couple times a week too for something to pop up. It's not like it's free either to have a provider page. So I don't know what to make of this. Do you think it's maybe someone from law enforcement possibly just using it to message clients from their end only?

https://rentmen.eu/metalboyxxx

Edited by BuffaloKyle
Posted
15 hours ago, BuffaloKyle said:

So this provider created a page in September and he's been logging into it on a regular basis. There just is no way to contact him as he has no phone # listed and has disabled instant messages. I've been checking his ad a couple times a week too for something to pop up. It's not like it's free either to have a provider page. So I don't know what to make of this. Do you think it's maybe someone from law enforcement possibly just using it to message clients from their end only?

https://rentmen.eu/metalboyxxx

It's not that uncommon actually.  I've seen that several times and always wonder why they bother creating the profile if there is no way to contact them.  I assume they like the thought of knowing thousands of guys are checking out their pics.   Maybe one of the providers on here can explain it.  

Posted

I noticed his pictures were very graphic so I'd wonder why any law enforcement effort would do that.  I was able to open his message icon on the new 7.0 version  of RM. 

 I wonder if he would respond to a request for him to unlock his private video?   

Posted

Oops...Ok, graphic was a bad choice of words...I think explicit would have been better.

  What I was trying to say was that the pictures left nothing to the imagination.  

Posted
15 minutes ago, ButchAtl said:

Oops...Ok, graphic was a bad choice of words...I think explicit would have been better.

  What I was trying to say was that the pictures left nothing to the imagination.  

I think “gross” would be more accurate. 

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...