Special for VGL and Very fit (such a turn off)

[JamesMorris]

When I see that on an ad it turns me off and makes me feel uncomfortable

[+ OliverSaks]

Guys using VGL is so silly...

It’s a subjective term and a total turn off for me to see in ads and apps

[+ purplekow]

No I prefer to see UU Unbelievably Ugly. Lets me know that he appreciates my aesthetic.

[Wolfer]

I recently saw an ad on Hunqz with the tagline:

"Hot muscular jock for same."

 

I thought "I think he's in the wrong section of the site..."

[Guest europeanman]

VGL is an eye catcher for me. By the way, good looks are not subjective.

[MrMattBig]

VGL is an eye catcher for me. By the way, good looks are not subjective.

 

If you are talking about facial geometry and symmetry, you are correct. However, looks are still not 100% objective. There is always some degree of subjectiveness.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder after all.

[+ purplekow]

VGL is an eye catcher for me. By the way, good looks are not subjective.

Granted there have been studies which show across ethnic lines facial symmetry is considered good looking and the more symmetric the face, the better looking an individual is considered to be by the population as a whole. That however does not mean that good looks are not subjective. Individuals can and do have preferences which are well outside the societal mean. So your good looking may be my meh!

[+ purplekow]

Symmetric posts.

[MrMattBig]

When I see that on an ad it turns me off and makes me feel uncomfortable

 

It is a turn off and a deal killer when a client inquiries for a "student discount" or a "VGL" discount.

[Guest europeanman]

@MrMattBig @purplekow good looks are objective. AI can decide who is good looking and who is not. Sexiness and hotness may be subjective. Personally, I never found an ugly old man attractive. However, I found in several occasions, young VGL ones unbearable

[+ FrankR]

VGL is an eye catcher for me. By the way, good looks are not subjective.

Really? I find it very subjective. It is based on, and influenced by, my personal taste and opinion. Perhaps I misunderstood your post...

[MikeBiDude]

Personally, I never found an ugly old man attractive

Now THAT’S subjective talk

[+ freecahill1965]

VGL is an eye catcher for me. By the way, good looks are not subjective.

LMAO, if good looks are not subjective then why are their a number of unattractive guys with Ads on Rentmen?

[+ HornyRetiree]

Guys using VGL is so silly...

It’s a subjective term and a total turn off for me to see in ads and apps

 

Totally agree with you! Though you qualify for exceptionally VGL:)

[+ HornyRetiree]

No I prefer to see UU Unbelievably Ugly. Lets me know that he appreciates my aesthetic.

Glad I kept reading - UU to me is Unitarian Universalist!

[+ HornyRetiree]

It is a turn off and a deal killer when a client inquiries for a "student discount" or a "VGL" discount.

LOL! How about Senior Discount?? LOL JK!

[+ HornyRetiree]

I find this Handsome Young Man to be VGL and while all of him is nice:) His Eyes & Smile captivate me --

 

Doesn't mean you will feel the same:)

 

https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=1139735065

[+ purplekow]

@MrMattBig @purplekow good looks are objective. AI can decide who is good looking and who is not. Sexiness and hotness may be subjective. Personally, I never found an ugly old man attractive. However, I found in several occasions, young VGL ones unbearable

Obviously we have never met otherwise you may be speaking out of the other side of your ugly old man to be.

Artificial intelligence is artificial and while it may be more intelligent than the intelligence that put it together, it is obvious to anyone with real intelligence that the information that goes in determining what is good looking is based on statistics and subjective data and not on facts.

So AI may identify who is good looking by the criteria it is given, but as there is nothing that is 100% good looking, its identification is based on limited and subjective date. Subjective in, subjective out. I would agree that AI is able to measure who best matches the criterion that is used to determine good looks. I would also agree that there are measures which would suggest that there are indeed facial geometric determinations which would increase the likelihood of AI being correct in determining if someone is good looking or not. But the very definition of good, defines it as subjective. Good, better, best. Never let it rest. Until your good is better and your better is the best.

By the way, if artificial intelligence or any intelligence could definitively say who is good looking, we would have a know percentage of good looking people.

[+ purplekow]

@MrMattBig @purplekow good looks are objective. AI can decide who is good looking and who is not. Sexiness and hotness may be subjective. Personally, I never found an ugly old man attractive. However, I found in several occasions, young VGL ones unbearable

Obviously we have never met otherwise you may be speaking out of the other side of your ugly old man to be.

Artificial intelligence is artificial and while it may be more intelligent than the intelligence that put it together, it is obvious to anyone with real intelligence that the information that goes in determining what is good looking is based on statistics and subjective data and not on facts.

So AI may identify who is good looking by the criteria it is given, but as there is nothing that is 100% good looking, its identification is based on limited and subjective date. Subjective in, subjective out. I would agree that AI is able to measure who best matches the criterion that is used to determine good looks. I would also agree that there are measures which would suggest that there are indeed facial geometric determinations which would increase the likelihood of AI being correct in determining if someone is good looking or not. But the very definition of good, defines it as subjective. Good, better, best. Never let it rest. Until your good is better and your better is the best.

By the way, if artificial intelligence or any intelligence could definitively say who is good looking, we would have a know percentage of good looking people.

[biggerbilly]

Strange, I’ve never come across an ad that said this. I’ve seen ones where pics were required before hand, but never a discount.

 

God, I’d hate to take that gamble. I have had escorts hit on me in the past. But, I’ve also been rejected by guys who wouldn’t do much business either, lol.

Edited August 24, 2018 by biggerbilly

[KeepItReal]

Strange, I’ve never come across an ad that said this. I’ve seen ones where pics were required before hand, but never a discount.

 

God, I’d hate to take that gamble. I have had escorts hit on me in the past. But, I’ve also been rejected by guys who wouldn’t do much business either, lol.

Here is an example for your amusement: https://friendboy.pro/boys/CollegeDL

[biggerbilly]

Here is an example for your amusement: https://friendboy.pro/boys/CollegeDL

From his one pic, that barely shows his face, I wonder if he’d qualify for a discount or a surcharge?

[Guest europeanman]

@purplekow gosh you wrote an essay...

[+ purplekow]

Sometimes more is more and sometimes more is less. I leave it to the reader to decide which is which in this case.

[Wolfer]

Here is an example for your amusement: https://friendboy.pro/boys/CollegeDL

Wait, Friendboy actually has a toggable tag on the profile for this?? That's... Well. Okay. I mean, sure if a guy just mentions it in his ad. But the platform providing it... Okay, well, know your market, I guess.