xyz48B

No. But whatever. It’s not worth it. You do you.

You got to stick to a point for me to respond to it. You skirt about saying one thing then insisting I misunderstood what you said when you clearly said it. Furthermore, this was a conversation you started. The thread was started by @Unicorn. It appears others here have issue with the content of your posts too…particularly as it comes to bear on the statistical nature of bisexuality. Finally…Why don’t you hide me if you find my comments so annoying?

Meh. Overrated and I’m doubtful most people care

Why?

See…I don’t know what you mean by “best.” What do you mean? Do you mean rate? Do you mean time? Do you willingness to certain things? All those things can and should be factors worth considering. No one needs to be a jerk about it. Business is business. But it’s really simple economics at the end of the day. I’ve never had an escort tell me he had a better offer. Normally it doesn’t get that far because I don’t agree to a rate unless I’m seriously booking. If I’m asking questions about what he’s willing to do and when he could meet, that may affect my willingness to pay a bit more. (Even though we *know* we’re paying for “time.”) If we discuss money – talk that really kills any vibe – then I’m committed and not making plans with another guy. But before finances are discussed, I don’t think it’s unfair to discuss potentialities with several providers. At the end of the day, it’s business. And even in business you shouldn’t be an asshole. When doing projects for work, we solicit RFPs and whoever is deemed the best for our needs gets the job. We still need to inform the other bidders, but we don’t tell them, “Sorry, fuckers! We aren’t using your expensive-ass operation!” We simply say that we decided to go with another service provider. Professional and polite, but definitive. I can’t understand why that doesn’t apply here. It’s almost like escorts want to run a business until they don’t. This business is a business like any other until the rules of business are disadvantageous to the escort. Then all of a sudden it’s a very different kind of business. When things actually happen, that’s different, but leading up to, there need to be some assumed norms. Approaching things from a normal supply-and-demand angle is fair to everyone. And for the love all things holy, please just everyone treat everyone with respect. That covers a host of problems…

I was going to put this in the Friday Funnies thread, but wasn’t sure if it was funny, or just strange. What is going on here?

It really is acceptable for clients to approach multiple providers. It’s also reasonable for everyone to expect decent, polite interaction whether you’re dealing with multiple clients/providers. They’re not mutually exclusive. Why is it okay for a provider to ask me if I want to meet tonight because he’s trying to pin down timing with another guy if I can’t do the same with a provider from my perspective? What if I want to see two guys tonight? One right after the other…I may need to coordinate that scheduling. A provider shouldn’t feel that’s inappropriate. That’s my prerogative.

You fit the narrative to your own desiring to make sure you appear right. Reminds me of about 46.9% of the US population. Alternative facts… It’s so puzzling to me that after years of reading and speaking and writing in several languages with mutual intelligibility, I fail – in your opinion – to comprehend what you write. Could it be the source and not the target? I still think it’s just opportunism saying, “Oh, I was wrong, so you clearly misunderstood because I can’t possibly ge wrong!”

I like to allow people to self-identify. Can I appreciate feminine beauty? Absolutely. Do I desire to fuck people with feminine beauty? No. Appreciating someone’s attractiveness doesn’t mean you are sexually allured by them. As difficult as it might be to accept, some people – the majority of people – fall into either of the binary sexualities, gay or straight. Bisexuality isn’t as common as so many think.

I wouldn’t pay $5 an hour for a “lady of the night.” 😂 But that’s a matter of taste. I prefer sausage to fish.

That’s the crux.

You’re joking, right? You seriously think clients should only message one provider at a time - especially if time is a factor? I message the four guys providing tickets on Craigslist and one of them gets back to me, I buy the tickets. End of transaction. If the other individual does get back to me, I can politely say that I already purchased tickets from someone else. I don’t see why that’s a problem. Why this idea of messaging only one provider at a time, especially if time is a factor, breaks down is pretty easy to explain. And with real life examples. I’ve messaged providers who don’t respond for hours, maybe even the next day. Providers will talk about how many guys they get messages from every day. They presumably deal with those messages while also still doing appointments and booking other appointments. They have multiple clients. Clients also have a host of providers to choose from. When ready to hire, especially if it’s for tonight or sometime when time is an important factor, finding a provider who can see you at that time is important. So messaging multiple providers for a particular timeframe, at the minimum, is fair.

You’d be wrong. Sexuality as a social and biological phenomenon was well explored already then. You realize that 50 years ago was 1972? There were kids around in 1970s who most definitely knew what “gay” meant. Those are my parents’ formative years and they definitely knew what “gay” was. My mother especially because my great uncle was gay…and the whole family knew. It was a scandal, but they knew.

I don’t see that as a problem on a planet that has over 7 billion people. I forget specifically but I think I read somewhere that for all 7 billion people to live lives like average US-Americans, we’d need five earths. Declining population rates, especially in the US, seems like a fine thing to me.

Me too. It’s not like they’re reporting it to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

I still have emails archived in my account from my previous place of employment. Not only do you not know when that might be needed, but sometimes you have something that might be useful in an old email too.

Eh. If he can get it, great. If he can’t, he’ll adjust. He’s not someone I’d consider hiring for $300, though. Jedem Tierchen sein Pläsierchen.

Another good reason to vet possible providers beforehand. If “you aren’t that into someone” why would you pay them to fuck you? Pay someone you’re into…

We bottoms like a nice ass on our fuckers too 😉

For something like that, you can watch it for free at gaymaletube.com

I had a similar thing happen to me once. There’re plenty of fish in the sea. And plenty of guys who’ll be happy to take your money. I’m sorry that happened to you…

That’s your opinion. Preformed independent of particular facts, I might add.

I do so much email. Both on my computer and my phone. As for spam, most of the snail mail I get is junk. The regular mail isn’t immune to spam.