SirBillybob

Topophobia

Topophilia

I don’t know much about alteration programs/apps but I prefer moving images such as Instagram reels or Twitter vids, as they seem less amenable to photoshopping. Or if the freeze frame looks like the guy’s stills then I assume his photos are less ‘shopped. That said, I realize such things as filters exist but that seems to be a specific thing. Is that naïve? Full disclosure: I am shallow and favour “perfection”. However, I have experimented with trying to get off with obviously altered images, with little success. There seems to be endless content of tremendously hot apparently undoctored photos.

That crotch bush looks like the top part of a Sesame St hairdo.

I think I saw a few of these episodes but don’t recall as many as 18 of them. Gay, Straight or Taken? - Wikipedia EN.M.WIKIPEDIA.ORG

I use a newly unpackaged dry razor, no water, cream, or soap. Stretch out the testicles skin in stages. Easier to see the progress without rinsing over and over. Fast, never a nick, ingrown hair, or itching. No ‘Kelly Clarkson’ exclamations to ripping sounds. This method of course does not work on my face, as my beard is extremely tough and wiry, but I often employ it on my chest as well.

Or risk a wretched ratched hatchet job.

So basically, like, what the other one was suggesting: topophilia.

Appears to be a few studies launching or already commenced in Bethesda. A few other trials are completed. I searched USA ongoing recruiting and not yet recruiting. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02639299?locStr=USA&country=United States&distance=50&cond=Malaria&intr=Vaccine&aggFilters=status:not rec&rank=1 https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05913973?locStr=USA&country=United States&distance=50&cond=Malaria&intr=Vaccine&aggFilters=status:not rec&rank=2

See if this link works, or just go to YouTube yourself …

Have you seen the hilarious mashup of CMBYN with Danny DeVito munching on a juicy peach? 😂

Canadian Wildland Fire Information System CWFIS.CFS.NRCAN.GC.CA

Chatted with him in person in Rio de Janeiro about 17 months ago and again last (northern) summer. Nice fellow.

The best designed poll method for shedding light would be a mandatory monthly poll tax of $1. Wanna see community leaners and lurkers alike scatter to the 4 winds? That. I would pony up if everybody did. 😏

But I presume never late for a verbal gay-bashing tailgate.

Male Scouts of America in the Everything Everywhere All At Once Metaverse, with merit badges et al, if you accept all the cookie boxes, and some scouts strangling each other non-autoasphyxiated one minute, braiding each others ear hair by a camp fire the next. 😏

I have hired from ads less than 10 times in the past 25 years, yet hundreds of sessions, and have no pattern in terms of sched reliability to describe. In the examples above I lean to ‘team client’. However, there may be a parallel set of unique point-of-direct-interaction booking dynamics in strip clubs with private dances. I have had cases of dancers, as opposed to striking when the iron is hot in terms of my explicit interest in private dances with them, tell me they will circle back … usually the standard “give me 5-10 minutes”. This can be frustrating if they are very appealing and fixation-worthy. That 10 minutes may drag out much longer. I typically don’t experience much back-up option and the one I want is usually the one I must have. If he is my 10, I don’t want to risk taking up with an 8. But I am not an out of town visitor and I can return often. They will then case the joint for other introductions and to make acknowledgements with regular customers. At times I will witness the dancer reeling in dance cash and coming back to me much later or not at all. In fact, I may approach again and they seem to be enthusiastically up for it. I have no way of knowing if they struggle to track their contacts over 5 hours, whether they feel that they should not approach me after I have waited a while, or they are still hedging for a better offer that might come along. You can almost sense the abacus beads clicking around. Never ever ever do they allude to accommodation based on bidding. Not surprisingly, in rare cases where I have been a regular dance client, I tend to be accommodated at point of request. This weighing of variables must be as tiring for them as it is sometimes daunting for clients. I figure that in that setting the customer and dancer have mutual choice prerogative. Of course, the worst that occurs if one regularly lives nearby is that cash stays in one’s pocket for next time. On the up side, one would need to be delusional for the most part to imagine the dancer favours you outside of the pay cheque aspect.🤣 The transactional context keeps one grounded, most of the time.

More manipulation. Do you actually socialize in real life? I have not been privy to CV details, authentic or bogus, beyond any poster’s public message board extant representation of professional status and institutional context already submitted. I don’t socialize based on ‘hierarchical’ status. So now it was acceptable to talk shop with two Brazilian physicians that happened to be seated with me on two separate recent flights, one of which culminated in a family dinner with a view of 6-foot snowbanks, but the content of some 1,400 text exchanges with a fellow ‘sex tourist’ is restricted to trade playbook content? That is insane. Content and good will dynamics that would have made it easy early on to wiggle out of a misrepresentation and carry on friending? Moreover, it is not lost on me that casting me and my fellow queer sex tourists in such a restricted circumscribed way simply further calls into question and explains the inconstancy and apparent illegitimacy of their various impressions, as manipulatively described by you within your bonkers conceptualization of the intersect of trade interest and human interactional normalcy. These trite dust-ups can be as simple as squabbles about who is hot. 😂 What I am entitled to is the proclamation that you are a compete nut. What is in common among your tiny paltry dream team of evidentiary character witnesses is the notion that those sex tourists positioning selves as a cut above simply need to be cut down to size. I’ll discuss it over drinks with one next winter. —- Ripcord. Out. Pizza (well, not actually). As much as you are trying but failing to make my day with Succession out of the frame and Yellowjackets on hiatus. Date with recent recipient of USA passport and he is just as nice as my bio American cousins. Bye bye, toxicity. That includes bottomless SOTheB bargain basement butt-ins never seeing the light of day at auction, or … not never.

By the latter I take it you are referencing contrasts to self-appointed judges and non-bogus surgeons, both categories needing to puff themselves up and live in the board baseboards rather than attend to loftier tasks within either faux or genuine status. If you are reluctantly inducted (sarcasm, in the event the dim read this) into hall monitor and image-smearing, my guess is envy viz the former pro listing. The vigilante commitment is peculiarly commendable but puzzling.

That is not the point. What would have worked? What is bizarre is anybody that makes links without consent and paints lack of capitulation with further character critique. It brought you out of your hole with intel and that was the main exigency. I did not link you with another similar board. That was your prerogative. Anybody with a modicum of class won’t impute pseudonym links between, say, two Queerty handles that represent the same argumentative overly opinionated poster. Those iterations are one’s autonomous choice. At the end of the day, I am up against a few posters that serve the epitome of obnoxiousness. As far as personal significance goes, that you would self-appoint as arbiter simply further underlines grandiosity. Class: 0 stars. Intelligence: 4

Well finally a confirmation. And a whittling down to sources of YOUR questionable spin-doctoring. I am aware of my history of interpersonal transactions. I have also received, and maintained, written unsolicited correspondence warning me to keep my distance from, ahem, certain ‘angry’ members. You may be surprised about the source and how backchannel gossip plays out with oddly mutating alliances. You may be also surprised about recent correspondence with I presume to be the aforementioned seasoned members you prevail on for your flimsy case. Why would you in particular require a heads up about me? This just smacks of self-aggrandizing reputation spin-doctoring and buttresses my impressions made in the first place. Of course accountability is a governing heuristic, as is taking with grains of salt the number of stars allocated to anybody anything anywhere. Are you going to keep referencing entitled Americans? A very few are my bane, but I would not extrapolate from a sample size of 2 or 3. I might situate it based on proportional representation of nationality but that would be a gross distortion.

Not a defense if a distortion, a false claim of knowledge of ethnicity, and embedded among a series of put downs. So, what we call up here disingenuous stank.

I take it they don’t literally finish on the first stage but keep some in reserve?😏