SirBillybob

Well that took a few seconds combining clue and Hakim’s Razor. But I think the birthday may be Jan 8th and I would put him in mid- to late- 30s.

And that’s how it’s done, topic heading, as it’s catching on among some, though inconsistently. 👏

I can’t get past the high rising terminal habit, aka uptalk. In contrast to similar Australian speech patterns I wonder if the inflection replaces “you know?” at the end of a declarative statement, which he says at least once. Otherwise, yes, the word pronunciation is consistent with, say, (semi-)scripted but where he is himself such as SNL monologues. Not a linguist but I think he goes hard on r’s that occur lateR in a woRd. His sister Pauline, presumably also fluent in French, is featured in the series Sex Lives of College Girls and plays a New England student from Arizona, but I have not heard her speech patterns in interviews &c. As far as greatness aspirations it seems to me that he is somewhat locked into roles where the character is physically diminutive or could conceivably be of any somatotype. Streetcar? Nope. Maybe after 5 years of possible carbs restriction he’ll pop some Wonka treats and have more options to play against physical type to date.

I don’t know.

And no need for adding “411” taking up room as it’s implicit in the subforum and most posted responses are from members that never met the subject of inquiry anyway.

In Asia penne yourself in and you won’t pho get.

And the topic is … providers.

Funny you should say this because the chaps that I hire that turn out to be straight have extremely diligent genital and anal hygiene, holes fresh enough for sit-ins. That’s also my face’s opinion when standing in as assstool where stool undetectable. No wipes or cootie-cull scissors required. My latest gay hire left skid marks, apologetically mind you, all over the single set of Airbnb sheets, linens that were to last the stay duration.

Tee hee. I’ll rear them without bossing them in terms of other habits.

I’m more generally homosexual than othergaymenincommonsexual. My self-serving exploitive objectifying use of straight meat represents far greater unresolved pathology than any residual internalized homonegativity that I might harbour. A cigar may be just a cigar. 😉

My first and foremost seeking criterion is looks, via ads or real-life presence with multiple selection options, not stratified by orientation. It so happens that the vast majority of my hires, for most of which orientation is eventually discoverable, are heterosexual. Obviously that will shape expectancies going forward. It seems more akin to shooting fish in the barrel as opposed to scraping it. I don’t need to analyze it. However, of my current top five hire “crushes” one is apparently homosexual yet not the most functionally performative among them and is the least inclined to cum, though that’s not a deal breaker. His orientation was ambiguous when for a few years prior I viewed his socials. I wouldn’t have a problem if all were gay and I imagine when viewing ads culminating in hookups that each one could be gay. My lifetime inclination to occasional crushes where sexual interaction occurs has spanned the orientation spectrum, though when unrequited in some cases I’m not hot enough and other cases not hot woman enough.

I bypassed Arexvy although my overall vaccine uptake has otherwise been thorough … in fact, a costly day trip to USA in Fall just to get a jump on CoV vaxx … and I now have moderate seemingly short-lived RSV illness but intense catarrh and hacking over two days when awake, finally settling. Also just entered northern RSV season after extended time in southern hemisphere summer. Bad stroke of luck as not much human interaction in crap frigid weather. In my 70’s must pay for it in my jurisdiction but going to test for RSV as part of a broad diagnostic panel upon illness onset cost me out of pocket over half the vaccine price. Now will pursue pneumococcal vaccine and review applicability of RSV vaccination next year. I think that covers it.

Speaking of jumping the shark one developing theme may be a sexually curious young Lochy, Saxes’ bro, getting it on with venue guard Gaitok and a leaked vid ensuing. (Myself having had good but drama-less fortune in LOS). But White’s clues are hard to pick up. Some folks have done a good job with this series, albeit somewhat a stretch, putting together telltale predictive signs ‘ex post facto’ once the deceased reveal occurs.

Though “I slept like a corpse” too much on the nose in terms of the opening floating corpse.

Using your brain means that even if all HIV status delineations are true to the best of all delineators’ knowledge there is no true risk hierarchy within the context of advertising. Positive is unambiguous and the variation in risk would be exclusively viral suppression, TasP status. One could assume a minority of poz delineators would not possess undetectable virus status. Knowing what you are dealing with is clear, clearer if viral load is accessible at point of interaction. Like selecting and meeting like is more facilitated. Negative is ambiguous and only as accurate as the latest test also considering lag time from exposure to diagnosis if testing is sought. One could assume that a minority of -ve delineators are HIV-positive with unsuppressed viral load at point of interaction. Like meets like in actuality is less likely, and objections related to status distortion are pronounced. What might impel a person to alter their delineated status? Well, stigma along with simply individual or collective buy-in that that there is a meaningful risk hierarchy delineated on paper without the deeper drill-down of actual transmission risk at point of interaction, as well as the overt pearl-clutching that is expressed upon falsely assuming an actual meaningful risk hierarchy in which positive /undetectable equates to higher risk within a loose hierarchy of transmission potential. Paradoxically, the status alterer is underscoring the lack of a true hierarchy of risk, but those, including here, that emphasize self-efficacy in risk management are on the correct track irrespective of their conceptualization of risk hierarchy. Stigma based on HIV status would need to be eliminated if the hope for care of others within the prevention agenda is to be realized. Catching somebody red-handed screams stigma.

He is discussed elsewhere but I cannot find the thread, though I think the word “ford” was in the ad name.

On mergers …

🎵Oh, makes me wonder, with a word he did get what he came for 🎶

Yeah, when victim mentality offers precise instructions as to such fabricated ruination and I can’t get enough Shadenfreude.

Because they aren’t in Ernestine about their business …

Paying in AR$ sounds word of mouth like it’s free along with the bonus of what you wanted in the first place. Would that all would agree to the payment of my AR$.

That would have applied to Remington’s Men of Steel in Toronto, long since closed. And for ranges …

I’ve enjoyed all his works. I recently viewed an interview on BBC. He writes slowly and meticulously with lengthy publish gaps but now thinks at his advancing age that he does have at least one additional novel in him.

Would that we all consistently have positive experiences several nauts out from what we anticipated.

Yes, for one of the venues with trade featured, if you are referring to professional non-erotic. I assume that by the term massage you are not conflating with escort trade on site. BTW FYI, if Canadian, American, or Australian and arriving in Brazil April 10th or later you’ll require the newly reinstated electronic visitors’ visa. Clube 117 massage is BRL220 one hour, 130 half hour; 10% less if cash payment as opposed to card or Pix, but I have not attended following the new price and discount structure this year. Room use is included. I am given to understand that one of the therapists is a former featured gogo/stripper and offers professional massage privately at a location on the same street in Copacabana where 202 is located. Club Point 202, the other venue with trade the operational model, IMHO has more flex for “crossover” service into ‘garoto de programa’ territory but if my memory serves me correctly a good non-erotic massage can be had for 150+. I cannot recall if the price tab upon checkout adds a room use fee. Just ask. I do believe that the same extremely muscular chap that has in the past provided deep tissue technique works there.