SirBillybob

I see Stuhlbarg is cast, Elio’s father in CMBYN.

And, for some, the income metrics skewed lower by larger sugar bowls.

We tend to go south to avoid freezing, not submit to freezing.

If the buddy wasn't two-wheelin' the guest was weirdly freewheelin'.

… not the wasted full two glasses.

Those pics depict somebody that looks almost old enough for being on the cusp of matriculation into a Quebec CEGEP.

The info is in his ad. He has a Bar Stock stripper history and has been working at Bar Campus in Montreal most of the rare weekends I have swung by this year. He has to earn to support training, etc. His travels tend to be brief and he bounces back to Montreal. I cannot recall his stage names because I address him in person and follow his socials by his true name. There’s no point asking for ID details you cannot have, off limits here anyway, because the ad is accurate enough to not require corroboration. He’s a nice heterosexual guy. Why would he bite the hands that feed him?

I just realized it’s by the metro station, College Park, merely one stop north of the airport station.

They have been asked, including by me, to put the info in the regular feed, if it’s genuine, and because otherwise it has the flavour of a scam. It’s posted there now in case readers miss the ‘stories’ format. They also reposted in ‘stories’ but it might time out again. May the rezerection of swinging dicks succeed.

Also Emma Donoghue’s (author of Room) The Paris Express, which I started reading recently as it was surprisingly inexpensive on iBooks.

But could Ser Criston be a turncoat?😏

It may be that in this context your ejaculation is problematically “premature”, depending on desire for timing and how it impacts on the interaction, the dynamics through the refractory period in which arousal could be markedly different (but fun if you relax into it) from the intensity leading up to the quick orgasm, and a desire to sustain such intensity for longer periods. As others have indicated, a good hire is oblivious to your timing, or merely flattered. It’s usually only premature cumming if the partner gets left out in some way. Historically, the diagnosis is typically hetero-centric because the female partner’s (outside of commercial sex workers) enjoyment is predicated on sustained erection. In another common context, solo masturbation, in contrast, you may be inadvertently practising getting to ejaculation quickly. Think on that. I know that I like to get the bust done and dusted on my own, but in interactive contexts I prefer to build arousal and I have ejaculatory control. I also have ejaculatory control in solo masturbation because I cum when decide to, just as in interactive sex. But pursuing orgasm quickly because that is expedient and habitual in jerking off can paradoxically undermine ejaculatory control in massage. Therefore, you likely have ejaculatory control in masturbation and those orgasms aren’t premature even if accessed in seconds. Moreover, the evolutionary imperative for procreation favours rapid ejaculation over female arousal and orgasm. We often align masturbation with several millennia of male sexual response. In the current age, however, ejaculatory control is framed as sexual sophistication. A shortened refractory period and the capacity for repeating enjoyable foreplay with minimal delay is similarly framed, notwithstanding the pleasurable benefits of prolonged arousal. There exists a solid sexological literature, packaged for the general public, on dealing with premature ejaculation since the phenomenon is so ubiquitous. Go for that. Wishing you good luck for getting the tip, and more, while managing sexual response.

Side business … so both active and passive income. 😏

Such sentiment suggests that you may be admonishing multitudes of young guys to declare substantial proportions of your hard-earned retirement net income to CRA, RevQC, etc. 😂

The data, then, reflect conjugal filing which enables stratification by same-sex vs different-sex couples as well as extracting single filing data, given that each partner files and enables individual income stratification by gender in the context of homosexual orientation. It is legally imperative and usually advantageous, so reasonably reliable data are accessible. That enables extracting comparator data for homosexuals in relation to coupled heterosexuals. One bias, as you suggest, is the lack of single filer data by orientation, or nondeclaration of relationship status, essentially under the radar. Couple income is also influenced by parental leave and stay-at-home partners. There is a huge Canadian study on some of these questions, reflecting trends from 2000-2019. If you really want to get into the weeds on nonconjugal data where individual income filers opt to identify as gay male, lesbian, or bisexual male or female, it so happens that bisexuals are, by far, the lowest income earners (data from 2015-18 reported in 2022). Gay/lesbian orientation appears to nullify the gender wage gap seen for heterosexuals but does not reduce the gap between gay/lesbian persons and heterosexual men. Those data are only as good as willingness to enter orientation on mandatory statistics forms where for some items the preference to not answer is permitted, or the answer is non-verifiable. One very tentative explanation for the bisexual income disparity is that those who reported bisexuality tended to be younger, so possibly earlier within career trajectory and more comfortable transcending the orientation binary as far as simply checking a low-impact demographics box.

This one is set in a period span a bit longer than a day. LOL The tension builds slowly and intensifies in the second part. It’s his 8th, I believe, since On Chesil Beach.

This very instant I can relate.

It’s long, so be sure to empty your bladder ahead of time because you won’t want to miss a beat. I expect that Sean Penn will receive a Supporting Actor nomination.

Ben Shattuck’s additional 11 short stories in the volume are really worth a read.

Just finished What We Can Know. It’s in two parts, the first set in 2119 looking back on UK current times, followed by present day, so I thought I would take a section break but I couldn’t put it down. Very entertaining, with a few twists you don’t see coming.

It wouldn’t be projection because this example would be considered the transfer of a neutral quality to another, and that is not a defense mechanism per se. In contrast, attributing one’s own disavowed negative or undesirable traits to another in order to protect one’s ego is classic projection, but you aren’t describing tops in a negative light … unless you think they are shitty at topping, which could represent a projection of your own misgivings about topping skills. The latter is just an example. Besides, if they’re tops there’s a bottom present, short of solo masturbation by the top wherein interactive position is neutralized. If you consider bottoms in erotica in comparative derogatory terms, eg, “that is beneath me”, you may be manifesting projection, particularly since the bottom is absolutely essential to your identification with the top. If you wish to reduce any tendency towards psychological projection you’re better off being a side. That said, projection is common and potentially self-soothing. Spread ‘em for psychological health and ego intactness. Insert, receive, rinse & repeat. Otherwise, you are falling short of fully realized sexual self-actualization. Such judgment could be considered projection on my part.

1. Escorts worth their salt are open to a 360-degree evaluation format, to gain a holistic understanding of their strengths and development needs. 2. Escorts’ stakeholders worth their salt exercise discernment, judiciously applied feedback, and finesse. 3. The above is secret. Don’t tell anybody.

Here is the sentencing document. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.644597/gov.uscourts.nysd.644597.49.0.pdf