SirBillybob

I subscribed to a Fanvue offering, hadn’t heard of the platform until very recently but see it in your post. The one I got is “Hunkxter”. One can block monthly auto-renew, as is standard. What I find, however, is that when scrolling through the images and vids I often get bumped back up to the top of the Hunkxter listings. —- I know for sure I unsubscribed a few days ago to the auto-renewal of Hunkxter; I kept a screenshot of the cancellation confirmation. Today I see that I am still set up for auto-renewal, so I removed my card info.

But with AI one can potentially cast face, body, frontal load, and frontal lobe … himbos, rocket scientists, what have you.

Cloudy with a chance of …

I’m always reading, during either medium, closed caption and books.

Especially if you forget the payment due to conflating two versions of reality and need a gentle reminder. 😏

The IDEs of any month. That would suggest the financé stage had been previously achieved.

I don’t do them but I read. I think it’s arguing about money and sex, then sometimes having make up sex after walking away to cool down or not.

I have been finding consistently that downloading a Prime movie or series episodes yields ad-free viewing in contrast to watching the same things on the home page. Hulu is not available in Canada but its content seems to drop on Disney+ up here, ad free. Apple and Netflix seem to be commercial-free so far. I have neither encountered ads nor been prompted to an ad-free upsell. CBC Gem has ads. I basically only watch the Brit baking competitions, mostly in fast forward, and occasionally a series, but this streaming service is merely about $4USD monthly and the Sports component offers fuller viewing than on CBC cable.

But tell us, Liebling, did he love you ja, ja, ja on that harmonious hard day’s night?

Sir, this is a jurisprudence thread, not a Laplander livestock fair benefitting from overheated objectifying commentary on marketable traits.

At the very lease I assume most of them are over-leveraged.

Providing the table, a two-fer Groupon logic, and reducing Uber-$urge risk didn’t annul capitalism. You asked and were denied a call-out discount. The market spoke. Then asked and were mostly charged a call-out fee.

I’m in a Nordic Model context. Let’s back this up to the first risky steps. Those are the stages that at a legal level predetermine, override, any subsequent stages that yield harsh life lessons such as money lost. In my jurisdiction there is no “who blinks first” MAD option; the payee possesses impunity. Either way, reciprocal lawbreaking as potential ammunition (or not) when threatened, why leave texting tracks that implicate oneself? Even codified language such as “gen” is up for prosecutorial evidentiary value. We know this, for example, from criminal charge affidavits and pre-sentencing reports in which abbreviations, letters and numbers, even ‘Imma devilish badass’ emojis are deemed to be recognized as shorthand code and are interpreted as intent. Short of stings by real law enforcement officers that show up and apply handcuffs when an exchange is confirmed on the spot, almost everything these days is based on what you texted. Wasn’t that the central grift in the OP’s account? Beware writing your sexual actualization rights away by pre-texting your guilty plea. Especially since there’s no shortage of content (erm, everywhere) that can school scammers on finessing swindles.

To be honest, I’m having to guess the chronology of events described in the third and fourth paragraphs combined. Glad you are OK, though. With q2wks injections Hx under your belt you are a trooper hardly in need of a Victorian fainting couch, thus far, or you’d be pretty bruised up. One small variable sometimes overlooked with injections is a vasovagal response, where transient hypotension can occur even in people who aren't overtly needle-averse, not necessarily consistent across or within contexts. In those cases, being fully "relaxed" can paradoxically lower blood pressure further, whereas some are coached to use light muscle tensing to maintain perfusion. Not saying that's what happened here, but with variable BP and medication adjustments, the physiology could line up in that direction.

That’s so square … root of 69.

And is it “underscore 8 8 8 8 8 8 8” for one example, or “underscore 9 underscore 9 underscore 9 underscore 9 underscore 9 underscore 9 underscore 9” for another example? I might recommend the single syllable “bold” in either case.

I read the book last week, a real page turner, and excited to see the film today. I am curious as to how many of the dozens of seemingly insurmountable problems the duo scientifically solves are integrated into the script. In spite of knowing the conclusion I expect to be relatively E = mc scared.

Great report. Based on my expedience [sic], I think I would consider every room in which sex occurs a ‘cursing’ [sic] room.😏

Recently back from several weeks in Brazil, and I thought I’d share a small field report for anyone dealing with the e-Visa. Arriving in São Paulo, about to embark on domestic travel amounting to a combined total tiring 20 hours overall, I came prepared. Passport history, entry/exit dates, and a carefully tallied count of days used since my last “migratory year” reset in March 2025. In my mind, there were three possible outcomes: Scenario 1 (textbook version): The agent applies the rules as written. My migratory year reset in March 2025 would mean I still had some unused days from that cycle. Only the tail end of this trip (that commenced February 2026 onward) would start drawing from a new allowance resetting in March 2026. In other words, no lost days, just orderly bookkeeping. Scenario 2 (surprisingly generous version): The agent anchors everything to the formal e-Visa acquisition requirement, post–April 9, 2025, my first entry on that basis mid-May. That would actually give me more carryover days and push the next reset to mid-May 2026, well beyond this trip. Pleasant, but unlikely. Scenario 3 (“keep queue moving” version): A quick glance at the visa, a stamp, and a handwritten “90 days”, as if prior travel history were more of a philosophical concept than an operational one. The result a few quietly vanished weeks from the theoretical allowance. As you’ve probably guessed, Scenario 3 won. I chose not to argue the finer points of migratory accounting at that moment. Fortunately, my upcoming travel plans happen to fall just within the stamped allowance, so no immediate harm done. Otherwise, I suspect I might have needed to become intimately familiar with some type of appeals process. So, for anyone relying on a precise interpretation of the e-Visa rules, particularly if a frequent visitor, best to treat the theoretical framework as … aspirational(?) USD$80.90 caveat emptor.

“There will be no bargain, young Jedi.”

Really nice guy. Originally met on a single occasion at Bar Campus around Oct 2024. Had fun at his place in The Village another time after seeing his ads, subscribing to his OnlyFans ($12.63), and getting additionally worked up following the previous club private time. $200 as depicted. I didn’t redact his first name because a reviewer mentioned it anyway as well as it being his stage name.

I wonder if some of the film locations are Hokkaido Island.

I like being up a penny net gain. But your kilometrage may vary.

They are laxative / enema, in contrast to douche.

Next iteration of fun with customs / immigration officers … Officer: A-ball, you say? This looks like an oversized gummie and the name screams illegal drug. Entrant: No, it blocks residual rectal canal fecal matter during receptive anal intercourse and self-expels during subsequent bowel movement. I realize it rings like “8-ball” without the ‘t’ but that tracks with its size approximately one-eighth of the object length for which it is ultimately purposed. —- Pick one based on probability … Officer: Yeah, right, fancy spit-balling. Extend both hands in front of you. Officer: But inquiring minds want to know, does it impede prostate stimulation and prostate-mediated robust ejaculation, or are thrust vibrations satisfactorily transported through the barrier?