Jump to content

GTMike

Members
  • Posts

    1,492
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by GTMike

  1. Oh, you're welcome - And likewise, like i said, we all make mistakes from time to time. #factsmatter.
  2. Hmmm, nah sorry MisterMike. You seem to be twisting things. You responded directly to my comment and added to "not normalize violence based on non-payment or perceived scam" but you omit that I specifically and explicitly stated twice that i did NOT condone the violent response. What i only pointed out was that in your original comment you said that "Either something is missing from your story, or that escort assaulted someone on a whim which puts him into a category of providers to avoid. To which i had only originally commented that IronMaus had laid a predicate to the situation of the alleged serial bad behavior and although i didn't agree with the providers actions, I didn't think it was totally accurate to say that the "escort assaulted someone on a whim"? For example, I might think that if someone came into someone's home even as a guest and stole $1,000 from them and the person reasonably expected that no one including the Police could or would help them, and again i don't condone the violence but given the circumstance, i wouldn't characterize that response as whimsical. And i also agreed that if escorts are whimsically beating up clients then of course they should be put into a public warning category to avoid! Then later in your comment to me, you suggest that I was the one normalizing violence (only because i pointed out that given the circumstances it might be unfair to say the escorts decision to beat a client up was "whimsical") despite me saying multiple times, i didn't condone his violent actions. By the way since we're nitpicking, your original comment of "Either something is missing from your story, or that escort assaulted someone on a whim which puts him into a category of providers to avoid" actually suggests that perhaps resorting to physical violence would be an appropriate response in some circumstances depending on the missing information. So to recap.... try to be more careful with your words and innuendo, especially in a medium like this where it is hard to fully express one's opinions and provide full context etc.., but it's ok, we all make mistakes from time to time.
  3. GTMike

    411 drporter?

    It's him. He has moved arouond a bit and does change his profile name but it is the same guy. I've known him for a while and have seen him recently. I agree with all the above comments. Cool, nice and interesting guy.
  4. Haha. Hopefully he'll resurface. Was interested to meet him to see what he is about.
  5. I am not condoning that the escort who is being referenced should have resorted to violence, nor am i condoning the behavior of this alleged habitual scammer client, but i took, IronMaus' comment more to mean that the Escort was aware of the existence of "a particluar habitual bad check guy", and to be on alert, but did not know the extent of how much he frequently changed and tried to disguise his past identities and therefore inferred that if there was a more robust system in place for escorts to "compare notes" as an example the whole unfortunate episode could've been potentially avoided. Again I'm not condoning the violence and maybe perhaps this provider should absolutely be avoided due to anger management issues and impulsive violent streaks, but it might be unfair to suggest that he "assaulted someone on a whim" in your response when you leave out the fuller context and the beginning of the comment which started as... "There is a guy in SF that gives people bad checks after a session--after saying he'll use cash or card. He often involves security and sometimes calls the police. He has done this to dozens of people and many people I know. He uses burner phones, alternate yet accurate stats, and has several locations (he claims are airBnB) to host. Most of these details have been posted on Twitter. I make a lot of notes and save this sort of information. I've several numbers, descriptions, addresses, and names for him. I have a copy of a bad check and a video of him screaming "security". He's tried to hire me several times. I've politely declined." Who knows maybe the missing piece of info was sometime during the session the client commented that he would write him a check when they were finished despite telling him beforehand he'd pay in cash as was prefaced as the guy's scam and it dawned on the provider mid way, that "oh shit", maybe this is the notorious "bad check guy" and he confronted him? Total speculation on my part which i admit, but play the rest out logically. If it is indeed the scammer he prolly doesn't have any cash and says to provider something to the effect of, what are you gonna do? Sue me? Call the cops? But you're correct if there are providers who are beating up clients whimsically we OBVIOUSLY should be all aware of who they are just as providers should know of clients who go to elaborate and great lengths to constantly scam them and then play the victim and uses security and police to further the scam knowing the provider is more vulnerable and not likely to assert their rights.
  6. GTMike

    RM Conditions

    It has been doing that off an of for me over the past 10 days or so. I had to just refresh it a couple times but then it started working fine but occasionally does make you have to repeatedly accept the terms and conditions. The first time 10 days ago, it was almost as if you had to accept the new terms and conditions for every international domain name for the site.
  7. Cool, i was gonna ask you about the Age to confirm but thanks man. Glad you're having a great time!
  8. I saw and was thinking the same thing but the Picture at the top the review isn't used in any of the providers RM photo's nor any photo's that the Provider sent me a couple weeks ago in anticipation of meeting up. I was thinking it might be a different "Dillon" from 2005 and the one being reviewed more recently. Just a thought that could explain the age discrepancy.
  9. Thanks for providing updated link. Appreciated.
  10. Bumping this for more recent encounters and feedback on Mr. Maddox in his recent travels? He's seems great but traditionally just not my "type" but am completely intrigued (read think i could be seduced by him hahaha) so looking for as much info and feedback as possible before deciding.
  11. I don't know too much but those pic's for sure were used under a different profile name over year ago by a guy in LA. I never met him but there were threads then on that profile name (which apologies, the name is escaping me at the moment) as being totally "fake" in terms of not being the guy who showed up. Don't know if it's the same person just using a different profile name or a new person using the same pic's.
  12. Thanks gentlemen. I guess unfortunately i have no apologies to extend.
  13. I feel like I've seen some of these Pic's (https://rent.men/EthanGrande/) before used on a different profile and a super sleuth found them to be fake? If wrong, apologies.
  14. I feel like I've seen some of these Pic's (https://rent.men/EthanGrande/) before used on a different profile and a super sleuth found them to be fake? If wrong, apologies.
  15. I'll provide an answer for myself (not as an escort) but can say that a very experienced escort who has been on RM quite a bit (i think he still is) that we did develop and have that type of relationship. Caveat though that he considered what i liked really tame and easy for him but he liked hanging out regardless and so it was at his insistence that the renumeration for time stop because we basically became buddies with (mild) benefits.
  16. I would say that it depends. I think it really has to happen naturally over time and you'd really have to have a few sessions with the provider before moving into that type of relationship or it might seem forced or that you are potentially gonna be too clingy. I'm friendly/friends with all the regulars i hang out with but it takes time for it to be real and authentic.
  17. Ugggh!!! You know what i mean!
  18. So 300 escort was his reply?
  19. Hahaha. Really funny but more seriously it is the reality whether people like it and/or accept it or not. Hahaha
  20. Very new profile (https://rent.men/Castle_Wolf/) but curious if perhaps this is a swap out from an older one or perhaps a masseuse expanding services?
×
×
  • Create New...