MscleLovr

I saw that too @bigjoey. My only quibble is your use of “may have stretched”…but maybe you’re being kind to Delusional Narcissistic Meghan. When DNM complained to Oprah about this, I did wonder just how much joy and delight she got from - waiting at check-in, - being inline to clear Security (even if it was the First Class line) - showing her passport at Border Control before - waiting for her luggage to appear on the carousel Silly Me then realised she had just swept from the aircraft to the limo, while her staff dealt with these commonplace formalities. I also recall the staggering cost to UK taxpayers of her ‘baby shower’ in NYC (when UK Police Protection Squad officers had to accompany her, along with armed protection from the State Department).

It’s important that you keep acting as normal @Lucky. I don’t want your protestations of innocence to alert the Police.

i was an avid fan of CSI so I learned about flies and decomposing bodies. Who else wonders if @Lucky was in confessional mode earlier? Now that it seems he’s got rid of the body, will he go ‘silent’ or will he, like Delusional Meghan, be ‘silenced’?

I’m surprised that no-one reports having taken him out for a full and thorough “test drive”. I had thought from previous online posts that twinks were very popular

The Palace statement was conciliatory. And 61 words long. It’s also pointed in quite a subtle way. Here you go… https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9343383/Queen-breaks-silence-Harry-Meghan.html

Did this guy just get charged with some offence? I met him years ago when he visited England briefly - that was before he became steroidal and heavily inked.

And for those who want to read more… https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9338421/Royal-revelations-test.html

I live in London and I could not have put it better @nycman. I doubt the interview will change anyone’s pre-existing view on H&M. When Meghan first arrived in the UK, there were several reports of her having come “to find a rich husband”. She befriended various people for help in meeting men, but once she met Harry she dropped those previously useful ‘friends’. I don’t believe for a moment that she didn’t do any research. I noticed Oprah didn’t ask M any tough questions about her behaviour. She didn’t ask about H&M shouting at the Queen’s favourite, long-standing servant, which rightly earned H a reprimand from the Queen. She didn’t ask why M blamed the Palace staff when H&M had handpicked them to run their private office in the Palace. It’s ironic that M blamed Palace officials for not supporting/helping her when they are the ones who tried to bury the several complaints of staff about M’s bullying behaviour. I disliked H&M complaining about being financially cut off, security being cut and the lack of a title for Archie. 1. Diana left H about $15 million on her death; being a child, it was invested on H’s behalf and when he became of age to inherit the money, it was approximately 4x that sum. Why should H expect to get money from his Dad once he ceased to work for the Royal family? 2. Security is provided by the UK Police and it costs the UK taxpayer. Only the senior working members of the Royal family get that protection. 3. M alluded to a “convention” but seemed to me to imply that because of his mixed-race Archie didn’t get a title. It’s a rule (set more than 100 years ago by King George V) that the titles of Prince, HRH etc are awarded only to some (not all) lineal descendants of the reigning Monarch. The children of H would never have been given titles, but H&M could have chosen the courtesy title of Lord for Archie and they chose not to - they registered his birth as Master which is used in the UK for any boy-child. Personally I hope the Queen strips H&M of their remaining titles. And I hope H&M stop seeking publicity, and retreat into anonymity and a quiet life in California.

Yes, because being in a relationship can mean much higher costs overall.

Why no mention of pecs @samhexum ? For me, well-developed and symmetrical pecs (on a preferably smooth chest) are beautiful and erotic

Maybe I missed those posts in this long thread but I don’t recall many “bragging about…affordable encounters”. With Seeking, it’s a longer process and involves building trust and friendship. Successful…if both enjoyed their time together. I‘ve met a lot of attractive young men with nice bodies over the years. Many have confided in me. Not one has mentioned having a “gay older friend”.

I’m certain that you’re confusing me with someone else @marylander1940. When I hired years ago, I never insisted that I be “their only client that day”. Nor did I insist that they “MUST cum”. I was certainly clear with escorts about what I prefer and enjoy to do (eg I’m a top only, I really enjoy being sucked to completion etc). Equally I always mentioned that I enjoy lots of deep kissing and that if they will bottom for me, I find it very hot if they climax while I’m pumping them. Importantly, I ALWAYS emphasized to an escort - and indeed to anyone I met online - that I wanted us to have a great time together, so we had to be compatible and my desires/wishes were a menu, not a checklist!

I wonder if you are deliberately missing the point here @marylander1940 ? I agree with @The_Impeccable_G that Seeking is not a site to use to find an instant hookup or hire. I feel that many young men on Seeking are enthusiastic amateurs. They are sexually fluid or versatile, and they see an older man as interesting because he can look after them. They are interested in a classic “mutually beneficial arrangement”. I feel they would regard as crass and vulgar any older man saying I will pay you for sex. I do understand that some posters will regard any unconventional relationship as entailing “paying for sex”. Of course, an attractive young man wanting an expensive gift may please his partner in bed either to provide an incentive for purchase or to say Thank you…just as a wife may please her older husband in bed, hoping for a similar outcome. I don’t feel you can reduce the complexities of a relationship to a simple transaction. I always had a clear photo and true stats on my online profiles. Over the years, I met a few young men who genuinely prefer an older man, but on Seeking I found there were many who responded well to me. The ones I liked were nice young men with nice fit bodies; they were generally well-educated and well-mannered. Building friendships with them took time, but it was an enjoyable experience.

A triumph @samhexum. As the sun divides nicely by 3, why not hire 3 young men to look after you? Then you can regard the employment of each of the 3 guys as being partly Government-subsidised...

It’s subjective, of course, but my personal view is that a muscleboy looks best in classic white briefs or jockstrap. From time to time, I also like to see a fit young man wear solid colored briefs. I strongly dislike seeing muscleboys wear baggy underwear (like boxers) or thin strappy underwear (like thongs). The brands I like are Emporio Armani, 2(X)ist, Pump, Versace and C-in-2. Any briefs or jockstraps from these would be good. Obviously the mainstream brands do a good job but I think @orville that you should choose what you find sexy and arousing. I feel sure that your guy will appreciate that you value him and want him to look great.

I would not buy him clothes @orville. You do not really know his taste and size. And you are denying yourself some considerable pleasures, for I agree with @The_Impeccable_G. IMO you need a 3step program. 1. Dating a handsome young jock, I’d buy him some good briefs and jockstraps. I’d have him model them for me. That was always an arousing start to a date. I’d ask him which brand/colour he preferred and how he liked the fit. 2. For another date, I’d typically get him a large range of the briefs/jocks he liked. 3. On a later date, I’d take him shopping for clothes. Especially on a trip together, a shopping spree in NYC or London can be a lot of fun with a young companion. (I still recall a hot Australian muscleboy sucking me off in a department store changing-room as a quick “thank-you”)

I don’t understand @kko123. From what you have written above, you’re experienced in approaching guys on IG. So why were you asking in posts #1519 and #1520 on how to do this? The topic has been raised before in other threads (re economics of modeling and how to approach handsome guys online). My advice is to be very polite, assure them you will be discreet and generous, invite them for drinks and dinner, and then follow through on your assurances.

Thanks for starting this thread @Karl-G. I’ve been very surprised at how differently the well established, and often heavily subsidized, concert halls and opera houses have responded to the problems caused by the pandemic. In the UK, I agree that Wigmore Hall has done well (as it should as it receives large State funding and an extra grant in the pandemic) while the Royal Opera House has done barely nothing (despite very heavy State subsidy and an extra large grant for the pandemic). Glyndebourne Opera in contrast has zero State funding but has announced a somewhat reduced season in 2021 with 50% capacity to keep social distancing (even tho the UK vaccination effort is proceeding remarkably quickly).

Reading this thread, I don’t understand @jeezopete how you came to the conclusion about visiting Argentina… Argentina is an interesting country and society with rather different (old-fashioned) cultural norms. It has great food (if you enjoy eating steak), a marvelous coastline (but no fish in restaurants) and in normal times, an excellent nightlife. Argentine men can be very handsome but unreliable (chronic lateness is a problem). If you are going to Latin America for men, you may prefer Brazil. It’s easier to hookup there. As a handsome young Argentine friend put it to me, in Buenos Aires you can meet a guy in a club or bar and spend hours talking, only to go home alone; while in Rio or SP, you meet a guy, say I like you and he says Let’s go to bed.

@Monarchy79 you only have to add to your list ”what do you drive?” ”do you own or lease it?” and you’d have the typical initial conversational exchange in LA

To answer the OP: Is he your son? To which I always answer (with a smile) No he’s my husband And I watch them closely to see how they handle the information

Not until my late 40s. I‘m a serial monogamist with very little interest in dick. My boyfriends were always bottoms and to me, it seemed ironic that they had big dicks. When a LTR broke down in my late 40s, I started dating much more widely and I started getting appreciative remarks on my dick. I hadn’t realised that it is a good size (thickness and length) until I had a passionate date with a young man in San Francisco. He enthused so much and told me the curve when erect (inwards towards my belly) of my dick made it “a bottom’s dream”.

I’m glad you can laugh at yourself @Justin7402. Why not - next time you’re asked for money before any service - tell the guy you need to have an immediate date tho you’ve no money, but you just need to see how good his service is? I guarantee he won’t deliver, he won’t “cave”, and you’ll see the folly of your behavior.

That’s definitely a BIG boy in the shirt @jjkrkwood

All this excellent advice puts me in mind of the English proverb (which dates back to the late 16th century): “A fool and his money are soon parted.”