Jump to content

jusmeinbr

Members
  • Posts

    233
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jusmeinbr

  1. Bump. Any update in terms of other hook ups? @Pensant, did the Denver meeting happen?
  2. There was also a brief episode of him using the screen same Echodot in January of 2022 which subsequently became a client profile before going dormant as he changed to his current screen name. It is all outlined in this prior thread which I originated years ago when I had interest, of which I now have none.
  3. Here is the link for his R/M profile. If you see his response on his highlight interview question (what is your niche?), he probably thought he was giving you exactly what you sought in his communication to you.
  4. I have found from experience that it pays to remember screen names (which you did) if you wonder what may be the deal on a provider regarding his current status. When you can remember the screen name, just Google “rentmen <screen name>.” I just did that for your guy and Here is the result.
  5. In South Louisiana (to include the NO metro area), I think Uber would not come into play, or at least it hasn’t in the twenty years I’ve hired. Having said that, I found it galling when I made a business trip to Houston only a couple of weeks ago and, despite negotiating every aspect of a meeting (including me providing the hotel address at which I would be staying) a FULL EIGHT DAYS before my trip (which created a link which could easily be clicked on), I get informed an hour before our meeting that: I would have a $100 in/city “transportation fee” added to the $300 negotiated rate. Furthermore, I was simultaneously told (again, an hour before our scheduled meeting) that I would be required to remit a $100 deposit upfront to “cover gas” as the provider didn’t consider the upscale section of Houston where I chose to stay (and gave the address eight days before) to be “Houston,” notwithstanding the address CLEARLY being a Houston address! I therefore concur with prior comments that these transportation demands are functions of laziness (in my case, the provider not even clicking on a link until being ready to depart to meet an hour before the meeting) and/or entitlement!
  6. Profile now fully deleted, but this strikingly similar post is certainly more entertaining: https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/153530-new-twink-top-in-nyc-what-do-you-think/page/2/#comment-2324347
  7. Well, you asked, so here’s my observation for what it’s worth: Sure does appear remarkably (and I do mean remarkably)similar to this young man whom I might add now has a deleted RM profile since the following thread got so much commentary about three weeks ago: https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/151790-411-on-collegeboyfl-in-atlanta/#comment-2313293
  8. Just a brief notation that the RM profile now shows being expired.
  9. Here it is, and he is absolute perfection from my vantage point: https://rent.men/Dimitryy Also, here’s a thread on him which I referenced previously within this thread:
  10. Thank you. I think that's great advice and, perhaps, coming from someone other than me, maybe it may be taken with the goodwill that I know you want it to be taken.
  11. I knew you couldn't resist!! You certainly don't owe any more explanation other than that. What's interesting is that, according to your theory, what one should do is wait until a provider is actually in the city before initiating contact (and to carry it to your stated extreme have put out the "available now" green light). Well, that sort of defeats the whole purpose of you even divulging travel plans, no? After all, had you not listed New Orleans as a place you were visiting this weekend, I never would have initiated contact, no? The reality is that you never would have responded, and that's just fine (apparently that would have matched the pattern on the post right above my original post). What happened, though, is that someone obviously sent you a link via text to this thread and likely introduced you to the whole existence of this community. So, once you saw the post, it was at that point you decided to make a statement on the matter. I promise you that if you'd said, "Look, I chose not to reply," (which you did) and ended the sentence there, you would not have heard another word out of me on this forum. Instead, you decided, of your own volition, to state a reason why you "chose" not to reply. In stating that reason, you manufactured a completely false narrative to which you've yet to provide any explanation for whatsoever, nor or you now even denying that the narrative was false. Nobody suggested that this is a "business or profession" for you, but that doesn't mean the typical prospective client is just going to let you say whatever you want to say irrespective of how false that statement is. That's a practice you may wish to curtail in whatever business or occupation you do want to make for your daily grind after graduation (and I know you'll graduate at or near the top of your class because your grammar and punctuation skills are stellar) and for the remainder of your life, which is, in all likelihood, going to be 70 - 75 years in your case. For me, it's much shorter, but I've had a great life whether it ends tomorrow or 25 years from now (about the max I can possibly hope for).
  12. If you mean my credibility, you are most welcome to decide whom you deem credible and whom you do not!
  13. Then why'd you respond? Yeah, I'm man enough to ADMIT I got on this forum to state fact! You may not have liked the fact, but you do not deny that it is fact! You, on the other hand, decided to fabricate a conversation that never transpired, nor are you even now suggesting that it did ever transpire, but you simply want to fold the tent and declare it, "not worth responding to!" Giving you the benefit of the doubt that you did in fact change your travel plans, was it really overly burdensome to merely send a quick text saying, "Thanks for the text, but it turns out I'm going to Denver rather than New Orleans?" I too had travel plans and in fact was out-of-state yesterday; however, I actually would have postponed that had there been a realistic chance that I thought a meeting was possible for which we may both enjoy. That is why I tried to get SOME response from you in order that I could solidify MY OWN plans for the weekend. I am going to reproduce the totality of that text sent to you, which represents 100% of the correspondence between us in our entire lifetimes: Sent on Wednesday, June 19, 2024 @ 1:42 p.m. (only 49 hours before my planned departure for Texas unless something positive developed from the outreach): ---------- Hi. I like your RM ad. Here is the link for mine which spells out all I seek: <link supplied> Let me know if you may want to hook up while you're in NO this weekend. Thanks. ------------- It's a mere common, professional courtesy to let someone know something changed or even, "We're not a good match," which is a perfectly acceptable reply and one I've expressed appreciation for with other providers (see the 5th post on this thread): I have never "contacted" you again (and have no interest or intention of doing so in the future), but let me educate you a little. You do not tell me what I will and won't do when it comes to this forum! If you wish not to go "back and forth," the ball is in YOUR court to not respond!
  14. I am going to make two concluding observations about this thread because I believe that I have authoritatively shot down the notion that this young man and I ever engaged in communications at all in the past. Number one: his profile indicates that he apparently changed his mind about visiting New Orleans this weekend, and it presently shows that he is in Denver, Colorado. I make that notation simply so anyone looking at this thread sometime in the future will be aware of that fact. Perhaps his travel plans were “up in the air,” and I was used as a mere scapegoat in his false allegation about me when, in reality, the fact of the matter is that he abandoned a planned trip to New Orleans which he posted to his ad. Number two: this young man took out his ad on December 27, 2023. Accordingly, that leaves less than a six-month period at which he alleges that he has visited New Orleans, and I was “impatient“ with him on that visit. The reality is that I have engaged in communication with only two providers in calendar year 2024 (and none the last four days of calendar year 2023). Those two providers are him (by way of that polite text earlier this week) and Dimitryy. As I have documented in another post, Dimitryy and I have met three times this year. Those three times included me twice making a 19-hour round-trip to Birmingham while he was visiting there (early April and mid May). I plan to continue meeting with him whenever he is within a 10 hour or so drive from New Orleans. I wish the very best to this young man, not only in this venture, but in whatever career path he ends up taking outside of this arena. Nevertheless, I do not feel he will achieve it within this arena by making the sort of false allegation that he made about me.
  15. I certainly can’t speak to any communication you had with him, but you and I absolutely 100 percent NEVER engaged in any correspondence with one another until earlier this week when I sent a brief and polite text. I have been at this 21 years, and NO provider has ever accused me of being “impatient” either in private to me or publicly as you have now done, and for that false statement to be made about me from someone who would be unable to substantiate any communication to me and only one polite text from me is very disheartening.
  16. Perhaps you won’t find it so “professional” when someone falsely accuses you of engaging in a telephone conversation which never transpired and based on that nonexistent phone conversation references you as “impatient.”
  17. You and I have NEVER spoken; furthermore, I have never corresponded with you period prior to earlier this week!
  18. He is visiting New Orleans this weekend and, so far at least (6 hours), no response to my text either. I gave it a small percentage chance that he would respond based on the previous post on this thread, and I feel certain he’ll live up to my expectation of a non response. Nevertheless, I’ll make another post on this thread if he does respond.
  19. Thank you! Saved me the time of corresponding!
  20. Anybody have any experience with him? https://rent.men/Simonit Thanks.
  21. That would have probably have been challenging given how much time he has spent in the last few months in Thailand making joint content with a guy there: https://twitter.com/BeastQ101 I have no interest anymore (I find Dimitryy WAY more appealing), but in May of 2023 he was in New Orleans. Quoted me $450/hour, to which I politely declined. I thought that was that, but he responded back, “I’m down to meet for $250, but we’re just gonna hang out and that’s it. Nothing sexual.” I again politely declined and, ironically, I already had a crawfish boil coming right up which I knew would have TONS of guys his age range (many of whom were hotter than him) with whom I could (and did) “hang out” with for free, and even the crawfish and beer were free! 😀
  22. Also, I would note both Dimitryy and Andreep just happened to be in Orlando at the same time when the comment was made, so it is at least theoretically possible that Andreep made the comment. Not accusing but just saying it’s possible.
  23. He apparently has a very-near identical twin, FloridaBrunette, and the blonde version, who indicated he was in Biloxi yesterday and headed for the Big Easy starting tomorrow, has apparently changed his mind and is now in Miami but heading for DC tomorrow. He should find a much bigger and more rewarding pond to swim in DC than NO. Meanwhile, the brunette near-twin (slightly shorter with different color eyes) is staying behind in Florida 😀. https://rent.men/FloridaBrunette
  24. Just wondering if anyone may have anything to report: https://rent.men/Floridablonde Thanks.
  25. He was in my home city for several days about two years ago. I contacted him, and he was honest enough to say that he did not believe that he and I were a good match (based on the exclusive activities I seek from an encounter). I wrote back expressing appreciation for his candor. At least he did not try to force a square peg through a round hole.
×
×
  • Create New...