maninsoma

I know you meant "got dressed," but your typo gave me a laugh. The idea that all of the boys got in drag after showering amused me.

Calling this a "gay sex scene" is like saying any scene that shows suggested sex in a non-X-rated movie a sex scene. Okay, I'll admit I didn't watch the whole thing so maybe I just missed the more explicit parts, but all I saw was a close-up of mostly clothed bodies bumping against each other with no penis in sight.

I will add that I always search escort's/masseur's phone numbers prior to contacting them. It isn't that I'm trying to find out personal information about them (though it's surprising when providers use the same phone number that's linked to other businesses they have or their personal social media accounts), I'm just trying to weed out known scammers. I assume an escort might do the same search for prospective clients. Where he crossed the line was using that information as soon as he got annoyed by you; I would definitely steer clear of anyone who seems inclined to weaponize personal information that they found online.

I can understand how the escort in question perceived it as disrespectful. You should have just asked him for the duo price if you weren't interested in hiring him alone. He's right that you should have contacted the other guy to ask his rate for a solo session. Did he overreact? Probably, but it isn't like there's no justification for his response. This reminds me of a time I contacted someone for a session, mentioned I had seen a particularly hot porn scene of his and said something along the lines of being jealous that he had sex with that other guy because I found him so hot. Well, he interpreted this as a slight since I was contacting him, not the other guy. He then said he didn't want to meet me and that was the end of that. I really hadn't intended to convey to him that I wasn't attracted to him -- if that was the case, I wouldn't have contacted him -- but I think he received my communication that way when I expressed enthusiasm about someone other than him.

On the one hand, I'd say go for it if you are intrigued. However, as I assume you would do, I would require him to share more information about himself before sharing anything more about yourself. On the other hand, Rentmen seems like an odd place for someone who claims to be straight to be looking for a date with a man. I would be concerned that it's actually just someone playing games or, worse, wanting to get more information about you in order to harass you.

I am so sick of all of these attention seeking people. Let's assume for one minute that the mom's discovery of his fleshlight actually happened by accident, and let's assume for one minute that the mom's boundaries are so poor that she not only addressed her son but the entire family about her discovery. Why would that spill over into the public arena, though? If the young man is so embarrassed by all of this, surely he wouldn't take to Instagram to complain about it. And if the mom was truly horrified by all of this, surely she wouldn't continue posting about it after the man shared the story on Instagram. No, I am interpreting this as yet another "staged" event designed to get more attention.

Bisexual means one enjoys having sex with both men and women. It's a term to describe one's sexual orientation. Non-binary is a term to describe one's gender identity/expression. It basically means that one does not identify strictly as either masculine or feminine.

Maybe he just enjoys presenting as a female sometimes. Without knowing him, there's no way of knowing whether this is strictly a business decision (make more money, attract different clients) or is satisfying some other personal motivations.

I think a city in the thread title makes sense, and if someone is traveling and the home base is known, including both would be helpful. More than that, having at least the name in the thread title makes sense. I don't even click on threads where the title is so vague that I have no idea what it's about. I agree that this isn't likely to change since some probably don't think it's an issue and others might simply want to do things that they know bother other people.

I'm not a moderator, so I cannot speak for why that question would elicit a warning when others didn't. The reason I replied that he had/has a Rentmen ad was simply to point out that he's available to hire as an escort so if someone wants to hire him for oral sex he's clearly available for that at whatever rate he charges as an escort. Or one can hire him as a masseur and then roll the dice to see how far he'll go with you during a massage session.

Is there any indication this guy is an escort? I see he has an OF page, but didn't find an escort ad after a brief search. I'm just puzzled why this is in the Deli.

I don't know whether Rainer currently has a Rentmen ad, but he has in the past.

I drank like a fish in my twenties. I still drank a fair amount in my thirties. My usage dropped off considerably in my forties, and in my fifties I probably went months at a time with no alcohol. At 60 I still occasionally enjoy a drink but usually it's just wine with a meal. It isn't that I lost the taste for good Scotch/bourbon/whiskey, but I'm just not that motivated to drink very often. Maybe it's because no one I spend time with regularly likes to drink very much. Congrats for abstaining for a period of time in order to make yourself feel better.

Before I tasted a chicken pastilla, the thought of it disgusted me. Powdered sugar and cinnamon sprinkled on top of phyllo dough that contains chicken and chick peas, among various other things. I was a convert upon my first bite, though.

For some Only Fans creators, it is all about the tease and not delivering the goods. Just last week YouTube recommended that I watch a video of some guy who auditioned for American Idol wearing only a speedo earlier this year. I watched the video, thought the guy was hot and funny, and watched many more of his videos on YouTube. Through those I learned that while he doesn't want to label himself sexually, most of his sexual experiences have been with women (and of the contacts with men, I get the impression that he wasn't so much motivated to have the experience as he was manipulated by a photographer or something). He hangs out regularly with another guy who also presents himself as sexually fluid but who, went he gets into details, clearly is much more straight than gay. I watched someone review the first guy's Only Fans channel (one of those "I subscribed to XXX so you don't have to" videos) and learned that the page is mostly about teasing. Some nudity, but not much full frontal. Lots of homoerotic teasing but no actual sex. Thanks, but no thanks, is my response. When a guy who is a "creator" says something like needing to take time to figure out what their fans want, I call bullshit. Their fans want to see them naked and want to see them fuck. Maybe some guys really do just want to watch hot guys hang out naked or nearly naked, but I'm sure most guys actually want to see sex. If you don't want to deliver that, then I'm sure it DOES take time to think about how much titillating content you need to have to attract and maintain enough subscribers to make money, and maybe how to advance the content slowly towards more explicit content to keep thirsty fans hanging on hoping they will finally get what they want. I guess there is a market for this stuff or there wouldn't be so many people doing it, but I just don't get the appeal of very soft core porn.

It isn't my place to name other members or share their specific feedback, but since I started this thread one forum member PMed me to share that they hired him, enjoyed the experience enough to recommend him, but wasn't sure he'd repeat. So we know that his photos are real and that he delivered on what he advertises, but at least that person wasn't so enamored that he found a new regular. I know that happens for me a lot, though, so I don't think that leaving happy but not so happy that you want a repeat is a negative. It's just the lack of an overwhelmingly positive response.

Given that he says his training is outside of the U.S. and he isn't licensed to practice here, I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt and believe that he could practice as a psychologist in Brazil. If he were U.S. licensed, I'd tend to disbelieve him unless he wrote that he decided to forgive his license. The licensing boards for mental health professions are very strict in the U.S. and I don't see how someone could advertise any sort of erotic service and maintain their license. That being said, I know that some people like to pretend that they are mental health professionals when, in fact, they've simply taken some basic "life coach" training. Those people may be good at motivating basically functional people to go after their goals, but they are not equipped to deal with serious mental illness.

Not that I dislike the look -- I like it quite a lot, actually -- but it's interesting how limited the "look" is. If you look at the past winners circles, everyone has dark hair and everyone has a bit of skin pigmentation but not "too much" variation in either direction. No need to apply if you have dark or fair skin or if your hair isn't black. Sort of weird that an "international" competition seems so limited in terms of appearance.

I've never seen such a thing. $50 for 24 hours access? I know their personalized videos are horrible overpriced (I could hire someone to spend time in person with me for less than the cost of a customized video), but I've never seen a subscription rate that high. I also have never noticed a "gotcha" in terms of clicking on someone's profile. Most guys on OF show absolutely nothing unless you click that you want to subscribe, and unless you're asleep at the mouse it's pretty obvious you're subscribing for a certain amount of money. I suggest that if you want to browse a little, stick to Just For Fans. At least there when you check out someone to whom you haven't subscribed you are likely to see brief teaser video clips, video descriptions, the dates of page updates so you can see whether the guy is actively posting, and maybe some photos to give you an idea whether you want to subscribe. On Only Fans the only thing you have to go by is the number of videos the guy has uploaded; you might end up subscribing only to find out that the guy posts nothing but the same short clips he posts on Twitter (that happened to me once).

Doing Onlyfans makes more sense given what we know. If nycboi and his partners want to remain discreet, they can simply blur faces or make sure the camera isn't capturing them. That will surely eliminate some subscribers, but probably fewer than an escort having all of the limitations and requirements expressed in this thread.

If you receive your package, consider that a success. Right now in my condo building there are about a dozen packages misdelivered by a variety of carriers -- USPS, UPS, FedEx and Amazon's own delivery service. I used to try to track people down on social media to tell them their package had been misdelivered and offered that they could come by to pick it up, but it was happening so frequently that I was spending way too much time doing this and frequently wasn't able to find a way to contact people anyway. I also used to contact Amazon and they basically won't do anything else you are the person whose package was lost/stolen...they won't even request the driver to return to pick up a package they misdelivered only minutes ago! A call to other carriers results in the same thing -- a waste of time on the phone, sometimes an assurance that they will send someone out to pick up the package the next day, but the packages are never retrieved. So now they just sit there, accumulating dust until someone who lives here takes or discards them. I can somewhat understand Amazon not caring as it's probably easier for them to just send a replacement to the person whose package is lost once that person calls. Unless it's an expensive item they probably don't care about it. One would think the carriers would be more interested in making things right, though, since I assume they end up paying insurance claims on stuff that goes missing because they delivered it to the wrong address. Maybe I'm wrong about that, though. I can understand misdelivering a package for a similar address, but sometimes the street number and street name have no similarities, and the deliver address isn't even in the same neighborhood. Quite shoddy work on the part of all of these carriers, and this isn't limited to this time of year when shipping volume is higher.

If a friend or family member of the deceased stumbled across that page, I'm sure they would quickly figure out what the site's about and stop reading. I guess that's to say that I doubt it's causing much harm to those people. It certainly isn't causing the level of harm that the deceased promoted when they were alive, so I don't have much of an issue that this site exists. It does seem to be more about celebrating some people's deaths rather than educating anyone. That being said, the people who are firmly anti-vax aren't going to be convinced by anything posted on a website that doesn't already align with their point of view.

I've never flaked on a provider. I have had a few providers fail to show up at my place at the agreed upon date/time who then never responded to my texts/voice messages asking what happened. A couple of times I have gone to hotels and called providers, as instructed, to either get the room number or have them come meet me in the lobby only to be ghosted. It's horrible that there are game players on both side of the equation. As someone else posted, this also happens in the online dating world. Some people just like being assholes.

Definitely the money for me as well. I was actually trying to find a way to redo this question that would tip the balance towards having sex with five famous men, and I think it would have to be this: I still get to choose 5 famous men, but I get to have sex with one of them every month for the rest of my life. Assuming one lives another 20 years that would still be about $4,166 per encounter, but maybe that would be worth it to be with a fantasy man every month until I die. I'd still probably take the money, but I imagine there might be more takers of the 5 men if it involved more than 5 encounters.

I'm not a provider, but... Seriously, I get why many providers wouldn't want to participate here, at least not under a screen name that can be associated with their escort persona. Some providers, such as yourself, have participated here without creating a negative image of yourself. There are others who have turned me off as a prospective client by being patronizing or contemptuous towards clients.