maninsoma

You are not the only one who finds the younger, less muscular Stu more attractive. Stu has been discussed here before and there were at least a few of us who expressed that point of view. I like muscular guys, but the ones who become competition-level huge don't do anything for me sexually.

There is men-on-men sex on a submarine just like there is in penal institutions. Most of the men probably don't identify as gay, but when there is no chance for sex with a woman there are some men who will certainly have sex with a man rather than only masturbating. I would share details about how I know about either of these things but I don't want to share stories here with too much personally identifying information.

When the video was first released, I saw two versions. One of them begins with a very clear view of the flight attendant's work badge and shows the guy's face clearly. The other also shows the guy's face. I assume that if you worked with the guy, you would easily be able to identify him based on either of those videos.

Jason Momoa after his Baywatch days. I don't get the appeal at all. Joe Manganiello after he grew his hair out. Yes, I hate long hair on men, particularly if they also have scruffy beards.

True. I just don't know anyone who looked in the mirror at age 35 and thought what was being reflected back was old looking. They might have had other self-esteem issues related to looks, but it wasn't because they were already looking old.

I'm pretty sure where I live, once someone has occupied a place for 30 consecutive days they have certain tenant rights afforded to them, even if they are just a guest in your home or are supposedly a short-term renter from a site like AirBnB. If that's the case where the OP lives, he should make sure his guest visits his parents at least once per month, spending the weekend there. That along with his travel for work (which presumably means he stays in hotels while traveling) should prevent him from gaining tenant status. I'm not an attorney, however, so if the OP is concerned about that then he should consult someone experienced in landlord-tenant law where he lives.

Wow, 35 and 40 and already stressing about their ages? That might play well to some gay men (and I've known a few who seemed age obsessed from fairly young ages), but my experience is that plenty of guys in their thirties and forties who are "hot" are still viewed as "hot" and so aren't stressed about aging. As someone nearing 60, I'd say that the stress about aging seems to surface for many after they hit 50, not mid-thirties or 40.

I assume that some of the firefighters or marines in the documentaries you find arousing are gay but I gather you assume they must all be straight given this thread's title, so maybe there is something psychological worth looking at. As for being bored by porn, not everyone finds it arousing. As far as I know, there is a fair amount of "gay for pay" types in gay porn so I don't think you can equate men having sex with men in front of the camera as not being attracted by gay men; rather it's not enjoying watching men have sex with each other. Is that because of internalized homophobia or are you just bored by porn? That's for you to look inside and figure out.

Take this with a grain of salt, but I am wondering whether this guy used to advertise under different names. He looks like an older version of a guy I arranged an appointment with about a decade ago who was visiting San Francisco from southern California. I looked at that guy's photos (when I make an appointment with someone, I always save the photos from their ads on my hard drive so that I can refresh my recollection in the future about guys I've hired) and he looks like a younger version of this guy. Maybe someone else will remember the guy who used to advertise as Brenden, Branson and Bestcort9 and chime in as to whether they think this is the same guy. At any rate, I never met the other guy because he was a no show -- one of my most infuriating experiences since I've had very few no-shows and he was the first. Not great to spend a lot of time/effort prepping to bottom and then having a provider ghost you. In addition to not showing up, he didn't reply to my messages asking whether he was still coming or, later, what happened. I'd like to be told I'm mistaken about this guy being the same person as PhysiqueStud looks handsome and I'd rather believe he's a legit provider who knows how to satisfy clients.

Maybe he's just trying to create an image of being an asshole but is really nice? Nah, I doubt that. Didn't he previously suggest that it should be the norm that clients send money to people who advertise before even meeting them as some sort of display of goodwill or seriousness, and if a client ends up getting ripped off because the guy doesn't show up it really isn't a big deal?

Is the question actually whether it's okay for you to change the relationship with this provider (masseur whom you pay who has sex with you after work) to a hook-up situation where he doesn't make money? Or are you saying that you would still pay the same fee but just have him skip the massage?

I assume by 3 bills you mean 3 x $100, not three bills of a smaller denomination. It's interesting that someone who charges escort rates chooses to advertise on rentmasseur rather than rentmen. There's no way I would schedule a session with someone who's advertising massage services but who charges $300/hour.

I don't understand his profile. He states he is not currently providing massage services, and then a few sentences later describes his massage services.

Roman Catholic. I wasn't surprised by that, though, given the Catholic men I had met who had been sexually abused by their priests as well as the numerous gay men in the seminary who were out cruising the bars.

As a general rule, service providers get reviewed, not their customers. Go to Yelp and read restaurant reviews that will include comments about the food and service; you won't find a similar grouping of reviews where servers submit reviews of diners, mentioning how much effort they required to serve or how well they tipped. It's just the nature of the game even though it might seem unfair to the service providers. I have no qualms about service providers sharing stories with one another. I know that when I used to hire off Craigslist 20 years ago that some guys would mention that a friend of theirs had vouched for me so they felt more comfortable meeting me. I think that talk among colleagues is entirely different than writing stuff about one's clients online, particularly if what you are writing is demeaning, and even then it makes sense for one to tread lightly unless you don't care about how clients will react if something you said gets back to them.

I exchanged messages with a guy on A4A a couple of years ago. We were going to meet but then I didn't like his conditions (I always meet someone in a public place, not just have them enter my place sight unseen, and this guy refused; for clarification I am talking about a hookup, not an escort). I had already reversed image searched his main photo and discovered he was a priest. He also had naked photos in his profile. I found it very odd that a priest would be so cavalier as to use the same photo on A4A that's on his church's website.

I'm a little perplexed. Do you mean someone saved your Adam4adam profile photos and is now threatening to send them to people you know unless you pay them? If you're just talking about some naked photos, I'd suggest that most people wouldn't be very shocked today to learn that someone they know had taken naked selfies to share with potential sex partners. Would your family and friends really be that shocked even if they did receive a naked photo of you from someone else? Surely anything else they wrote would rightfully be interpreted as someone trying to disparage you, with no reason to believe them, so I'd say this perceived threat is really only as bad as you make it. I'll share a story here: some nasty people thought they could "take down" a colleague they didn't like by printing out naked photos the guy had on a dating website and passing them around the workplace, trying to elicit outrage that a person in this guy's position would dare post naked photos online. The result was that a couple of people were put on unpaid leaves for a couple of weeks and the ringleader of this failed "take down" attempt was forced into an early retirement. The guy they were targeting suffered no consequences other than that some co-workers saw his naked photos who would never have seen them otherwise. In the end, I don't think anyone cared that this guy had naked photos online on an adults-only dating website. When one of the sleazeballs tried to show the photos to me, I told him that I didn't want to see them and that I was appalled at his behavior as a gay man not respecting the privacy of a gay colleague.

While I agree that each person needs to take responsibility for his own health and actions, I also think it's reprehensible for someone to knowingly lie about his HIV status (not just not disclosing it but actually lying about it) when the truth might cause his sex partners to take additional precautions. I certainly wouldn't continue to see someone who had lied to me in that way. I wouldn't attempt to make it into a legal issue though, at least not in a circumstance like this. I'm aware of some escorts local to me who lie about their statuses since they mention being negative on some platforms but then state they are positive and undetectable on others.

Rentmen reviews are largely worthless. The only ones I give any credence to are those left by clients who are obviously genuine (for example, some reviewers use the same name there that they use on this website).

To the broader question, a lot of guys who visit my area do so regularly. I think it's possible to develop an ongoing relationship with a traveling provider when there is mutual interest. The person I hired the most was someone based in Portland, Oregon when I fired hired him in San Francisco, and my second most hired guy was from the Bay Area but during the period I hired him only visited a few times per year during school breaks from UCLA.

Might just be the capsules you had. Some are very weak (intentionally) and others are quite robust. With both the Nespresso Original and Vertuo lines, I prefer their bolder/stronger roasts. They use a numerical system to rank the intensity so it's easy to stick to the varieties that rank near 10 or above.

It seems like what has happened with self-produced porn websites is that they are now removing content unless it's clear that all parties shown are okay with their sexual activities being recorded and distributed online. Someone whose content I liked a lot removed all of his videos from XTube and wrote basically that he could no longer share his videos there due to lack of clear consent of his scene partners to be shown in videos there. A guy I subscribe to on OnlyFans wrote that he's only able to put up scenes where the other scene partners also have OnlyFans pages, so it's obvious that they consent to having their sexual activity recorded and shared online. I don't know if it's true, but I did notice a number of months ago that basically XTube turned from being amateur porn (a lot of it of dubious quality) to being dominated by studio porn, most of it teasers where one would have to pay to see the full scene.

I don't get the fruit analogy. Some fruits are best eaten after they've gotten a bit older and softened up, others are best freshly picked when they are more firm. Answering just the age range question, I'd say that my preferred range based purely on looks is legal age to 45, though it obviously depends on the guy. Some guys look their best when they are young, and other guys get more attractive after they've matured a bit. For personality, I prefer guys closer to my own age or at least 30 years old.

You mean this guy?

I feel the same way about Andrew. I notice lots of ads and am ambivalent about hiring so I don't follow through. Andrew is one of the ones I noticed but never contacted and regret I didn't since feedback about him was all positive. When he first advertised he showed his face in his ad, so I know I would have found him very attractive in person.