ApexNomad

I read that a second season seems unlikely. It was intended as a limited series. One and done. But it’s doing well on Netflix so anything is possible.

Look, a top knows when he’s not wearing a condom. Period. Quincy chose to fuck raw. So did you. (And that’s fine btw!!) BUT, let’s not rewrite the scene like it’s some non-consensual ambush. He had ample time to stop, put one on, and take accountability. That wasn’t an accident. That was a choice.

Yes you are. That we agree on.

Not with me he wasn’t. Revisionist history at its finest.

So let me get this straight—you’re the top, you only use condoms, and yet the bottom somehow managed to “slip himself in” not once, but twice—and you just didn’t notice there wasn’t one on? For the entire time you were fucking the bottom? Is that what you’re saying?

Unless his ad specifically states “Bareback only,” go out and buy them! Let’s not be cheap and selfish. (I’m also paying for his Uber to/from.)

I reached out to a provider recently—gave him my description, stats, exactly what I was looking for, and let him know upfront that I wanted to use condoms. Everything seemed great until we got to that part, when he started explaining to me that bareback would be much more enjoyable. He went on about today’s medications, “sign of the times,” yadda yadda. As if I wasn’t aware. Whatever my reasons are—they’re my reasons. So he said, fine, but that I wanted him to wear a condom I had to bring them (he told me which kind he prefers). Much like you, I got the sense that his reluctance would affect the vibe and make for a less enjoyable encounter. So I passed.

I LOVE gay bears!!! All of them. In my opinion, a gay bear is the kind of man who doesn’t just walk into a room—he claims it. Broad-shouldered and grounded, there’s an earthy confidence in the way he carries himself, like someone who’s weathered storms and come out stronger. His body isn’t carved from marble—it’s built from experience, from comfort in his own skin. A belly, thick thighs, strong arms wrapped in coarse hair—he’s the kind of man you want to fall asleep on and wake up tangled in. He smells like leather, cedar, and a hint of danger—equal parts protector and provocateur. His laugh is deep, his gaze disarming. He doesn’t need to perform masculinity—he is masculinity, in all its raw, sensual, vulnerable glory. And when he touches you, it’s not hurried or hollow. It’s deliberate. It’s possession with tenderness. A bear doesn’t just make you feel wanted. He makes you feel safe—and that, in a world that constantly asks queer men to shrink themselves, is the ultimate seduction.

Because it’s never too late to live in truth. Even at 83, shedding shame or secrecy can be liberating—not just for him, but for others who see it and feel less alone. Visibility always matters. Especially now!

Seems like an odd choice to spin a musical out of. Admittedly, I’ve never watched the show so I can’t really say. Only read about and seen a few clips.

I love low hanging fruit. 😉

Yes, I binged it over two days and didn’t care for it. I wanted to like it, especially with the cast, but it just didn’t land. The same tired troupe of gay couples in open relationships—yes, they exist (and it’s perfectly fine!!), but it felt overdone and uninspired. Why not show me one of the hetero couples in an open relationship and see how that goes. None of the relationships felt earned or emotionally grounded. It was trying to be profound but ended up feeling hollow.

What a loss. 👀

I forgot to talk about the set in my review. This is perhaps the best I have ever seen the circle in the square for a production. I’m trying to remember the ones I’ve seen there. What they did here was amazing!!

Why is he hosting this? His time could be better spent writing a sequel to Fire Island.

Have you seen it with Titus Burgess? He’ll be taking over again.

Love Conrad! He’s wonderful.

Maybe that was true a few decades ago, but Broadway today is a different ecosystem. For directors, it’s not just about talent or even past success—it’s about the alchemy of money, branding, relationships, investor confidence, and timing. Lightning in a bottle doesn’t strike twice without a whole team trying to manufacture the storm. Dreams don’t die—but they do get optioned, reworked, and focus-grouped into oblivion. And with corporations like Disney and powerhouse production companies dominating the field, even veteran directors are often sidelined unless they come attached to a brand or IP—and those brands leave very little room for true creative expression.

“Genoveva” isn’t a widely recognized slang term or euphemism in English or gay culture—it’s a Spanish/Portuguese female name (like Genevieve in English). In this context, it seems to be used as a personal code or nickname. For what, I’m not sure. He also spells Fuck with three Ks.

A newspaper? At his age?

Bc they’re expecting The Producers-level hit. That’s never going to happen again. That’s lightening in a bottle.

I get why shows do projections. Very rarely do projections add anything. But I am old school, and the amount of money I’m paying to see some of these shows, I want a set.

They didn't nominate anyone from Tarzan and they flew across trees too. This should have been a lesson.

👆🏻 ^^^^^

I appreciate your thoughtful reply, and I agree—there are cases where withholding support is a principled stand, especially when a business openly promotes harmful ideologies or takes actions that impact communities negatively. In those situations, choosing not to engage can absolutely reflect strong, values-based convictions. But I reject the idea that my stance demeans anyone or their principles. That’s not my intention at all. I’m not dismissing the importance of values—I’m questioning whether all decisions made in the name of “principle” are truly that, or whether some are reactions based on discomfort or assumptions, especially when there’s no evidence of harm or unprofessional conduct. I think there’s a meaningful difference between standing up for your beliefs and shutting someone out for who you think they are. My concern is that if we’re not careful, we risk calling it principle when it’s really just division.