misterhumphries

That's right. For me, the second I read "straight" it's a no-way, no-how. Straight boys have too many issues around their sexuality -- that they expect to be paid for by presumably desperate gay men. There is no shortage of gay or even bi- men who are happy to be with another man and who can be fully engaged in the encounter. Why settle for less?

But they aren't "playing" they are charging you several hundred dollars. I don't hire duos. They can work out their trust issues in other ways. I've been in three-ways but no cash exchanges hands.

In the past two weeks, the price of a dozen large eggs has doubled to at least $5.19 (the cheapest I found); an 18-pack of eggs was $7.25. Can't do without eggs, though so I try to numb myself to paying whatever.

I love a man with big titties. They don't have to bounce or jiggle. Just be available for me to get 'em

I love a man with big titties. They don't have to bounce or jiggle. Just be available for me to get 'em

Right. I'm not ashamed of anything I choose to do.

No. But mainly because it's never come up. I wouldn't have any issues discussing it with a man open to the idea.

That's right. For me, the second I read "straight" it's a no-way, no-how. Straight boys have too many issues around their sexuality -- that they expect to be paid for by presumably desperate gay men. There is no shortage of gay or even bi- men who are happy to be with another man and who can be fully engaged in the encounter. Why settle for less?

That's right. For me, the second I read "straight" it's a no-way, no-how. Straight boys have too many issues around their sexuality -- that they expect to be paid for by presumably desperate gay men. There is no shortage of gay or even bi- men who are happy to be with another man and who can be fully engaged in the encounter. Why settle for less?

There is no choosing sexuality; it simply is. For me, my choice was to accept that I am sexually interested only in men. I did not sit myself down and wonder: "Hmm.. What can I do to make my life that much more difficult and to feel ostracized?"
The very idea that sexuality is a choice is a step backwards that led to the gay reprogramming camps and religious groups who used to believe they could  pray the gay away. The DSM long-ago stopped classifying homosexuality as a mental disorder. Sexuality is biological, a genetic quirk.

Hear hear! The equation for escorting is the escort is PAID for his time.  If you can't afford it, keep it moving. There's not a requirement that a client be "hot" or anything else. If an escort has those parameters, it would reduce his income considerably. I'd find this question about a discount to be insulting and time wasting, if I were an escort. If you want to have free sex because you're "hot" it's perfectly possible -- just don't expect an escort to stiff himself (no pun intended) on his set fee.
 

I agree with you. Why bother with straight men or the undecided? There is no shortage of gay men or men who voluntarily offer their services for cash. I believe sexual dealing with a straight man is a disaster waiting to happen. When I see a man advertising on rentmen who declares he's straight, my brain yells "NEXT!!"

A Confederacy of Dunces. The jokes, the outlandish situations never get old for me. It's laugh out loud every time I read it.

If it's on the menu and the ass is spectacular AND CLEAN! I will gladly munch on it. But that's a very intimate act that I only do if an established partner wants it. And I know from experience bodybuilders love to get them big hard asses eaten out.

While it's annoying as hell, is this law really anything new? I always thought pandering & solicitation were illegal. To avoid the hint of selling/buying sex, most escort listings state you are buying their time.

Ooh-wee! that's too much werk! When I get to be 70 (knock wood) I plan on being in whatever shape my diet of donuts and fried chicken gives me. I will dress in sweatpants. I'll be as morose or as sarcastic as I please. And I will bathe only when I find skidmarks in my sweatpants.🤪

I remember smuggling the Gordon Merrick series of novels into the house when I was a teenager. And The Front Runner, and Dancer from the Dance. It seemed the epitome of forbidden reading. Wish I'd kept the books. But after I read them, I always destroyed the evidence.

I have just two words of warning: Linda Evangelista. If diet and exercise don't cut it, it's nature's way of telling  you you don't need it.

I feel your outrage. The current HIV meds are the most sophisticated drugs there are. Those of us can remember the early days when the only medication was AZT which caused more health issues than it may have resolved. I had a former boyfriend who was taking DDI. His body dysmorphia was advancing every time I saw him in the form of a gigantic pot belly and dorsal fat deposit.
There is no such thing as taking an HIV med break. What you do is risk building a resistance to the medication. You'd be back on the rollercoaster of switching meds to find one that is tolerable and effective.
We are our own worst enemy.

Same here. I got burned once for not using a condom. Never again!
As to the original question, as others have stated, the undetectable means untransmittable is good news -- sort of. Blood work gives a snapshot of a person's viral load at that point in time. If the escort has multiple sex partners (doing lord knows what with them) his undetectable status may be altered and he's not aware of it until his next scheduled round of bloodwork.
In any case, do not allow U = U to lull you into a false sense of complacency. Regardless of his status, you must use a condom if you plan on any sex involving exchange of bodily fluids. You, and you alone, are responsible for maintaining your well-being.

Same here. I got burned once for not using a condom. Never again!
As to the original question, as others have stated, the undetectable means untransmittable is good news -- sort of. Blood work gives a snapshot of a person's viral load at that point in time. If the escort has multiple sex partners (doing lord knows what with them) his undetectable status may be altered and he's not aware of it until his next scheduled round of bloodwork.
In any case, do not allow U = U to lull you into a false sense of complacency. Regardless of his status, you must use a condom if you plan on any sex involving exchange of bodily fluids. You, and you alone, are responsible for maintaining your well-being.

Same here. I got burned once for not using a condom. Never again!
As to the original question, as others have stated, the undetectable means untransmittable is good news -- sort of. Blood work gives a snapshot of a person's viral load at that point in time. If the escort has multiple sex partners (doing lord knows what with them) his undetectable status may be altered and he's not aware of it until his next scheduled round of bloodwork.
In any case, do not allow U = U to lull you into a false sense of complacency. Regardless of his status, you must use a condom if you plan on any sex involving exchange of bodily fluids. You, and you alone, are responsible for maintaining your well-being.

This is true of any profession. A dentist must have dentist. A barber has a barber. Why wouldn't an escort spread the wealth to a colleague?

This is true of any profession. A dentist must have dentist. A barber has a barber. Why wouldn't an escort spread the wealth to a colleague?

This is true of any profession. A dentist must have dentist. A barber has a barber. Why wouldn't an escort spread the wealth to a colleague?