Strafe13

You insulted the OP, and now you try to reframe the issue by saying that it's no big deal because he can defend himself, if he so chooses? Come on, you're better than that. The point is that the OP simply asked for recommendations on a specific type of escort. You did not respond to his request, but instead derided him for his fetish by asking why he liked it, and then rhetorically asked him whether there is enough of an entirely different type of escort in his locale for him to focus on instead. This unfortunately happens alot on this board, where someone will ask for info about an escort (or, as here, for suggestions on a specific type), and rather than provide the help sought by the OP, some posters will instead offer only what they don't like about the OP's tastes, or a critique about the escort at issue without providing the personal knowledge about said escort that the OP sought. For example, how many times does someone respond to a 411 about a particular escort with a post that offers no real useful info about said escort, but instead talks how the responder doesn't like that escort's tattoos, or that the responder can't tolerate smoking, or the escort is sexually incompatible with the responder's own tastes, etc.? To respond directly to the OP, while I don't know of any straight porn stars in NYC who also escort, I'd suggest going to the Spunk and/or Adonis male stripper events. Somewhat counterintuitively, most of the dancers there identify as straight. Yet, many dancers (both the gay- and straight-identified ones) are available for appointments outside of the bars (sometimes they have pro ads, too), and some of them have done some type of adult work (photos, modeling, and even porn, although that last one's much less common). Good luck! P.S., @marylander1940, I actually think you make a good point about the seeming incongruity of seeking a straight porn star to provide a gay man with a boyfriend experience. That's the first thing that popped into my head about the OP's request. But the fact that we think it's a little bit strange has no value to the OP, who never asked for our opinion on, nor our validation of, his specific desires.

I feel like there's been a similar recent thread on which I participated. I don't have the time right now to look it up, so here are my suggestions: https://rent.men/GingerSatyr https://rent.men/PrinceWilly https://rent.men/RobYaeger https://rent.men/MUSCLEpigBBvers https://rent.men/KennedyC https://rent.men/JAKEHAYES https://rent.men/Russelll. I've only spent time with the last two, each if whom is more strawberry blond than redheaded. Jake Hayes's hair is much lighter in color, and while he has a nice dusting of body hair, Russelll is super hairy all over and is proud of it. I enjoyed my time with both, but liked Russelll much more. I've communicated with Prince Willy over text and email, and while we never met up, he was very kind and polite during our exchanges. Best of luck!

Way to transform a compliment into an insult.

I thought your critique was kind of funny actually, and I meant petty as an entertaining way of throwing shade in the way that gay men are so awesome at doing. I wasn't taking it that seriously. If I were to view it seriously, then I'd respectfully disagree with you. You threw high level shade and it was funny. Perhaps a tad inappropriate, but funny nonetheless.

Damn! Shots fired! Sometimes I love the petty that comes out on these boards. :-) I've never been a client of Nicky/Mr. Slate, but I promise I'm always very respectful to all of the dancers. :-* I hope to meet him soon.

It could potentially be relevant to an "anal orgssm" (if that even exists), but only as a coincidence. That just means that you popped into his second sphincter that separates the anal canal from the colon/lower intestine (the external anal sphincter is the first one). That only happens if the penis is long enough and/or the anal canal is short enough (depends on how small/short your bottom is), and the angle of penetration allowed for it. I say it's a coincidence only because the anal orgasm seems more linked to intense prostate stimulation, which due to it's location, doesn't really have anything to do with piercing the 2nd hole. But if the bottom is super turned on by getting filled up to that level, it may contribute to the heightened state of arousal that may allow him to attain the anal orgasm. Plus, the pounding into the 2nd hole may also really work the prostate. It's pretty cool that you were able to please your bottom so well.

I believe this is the gentleman the OP asked about: Ivan McLain https://www.daddysreviews.com/search/All/Ivan/ivan_mclain_chicago

I'm unsure of how you define "recently," but like I said earlier, I met with Chris last summer. That was about 8 months ago.

I've seen Chris about 3 or 5 times iover the past decade. He was mostly independent, but I think he worked concurrently with Maximum for a brief period as well. I saw him last summer in NYC, so as far as I know he's still active, although he's gone on hiatus a few times over the years. He's listed on Daddy's in the New York City section as Chris #3, but you may have to select the inactive reviews.

That’s what I thought I’d remembered too, Boomer, but I followed the above link and checked his ad before I posted, and it listed him as a bottom. :-(

That makes Rod so much more attractive, IMHO. But why is he a bottom?!? The universe is so cruel!!!

His dancer stage name is Valero. He’s a big guy (everywhere), very ruggedly sexy and attractive (not pretty boy handsome), and he was pretty nice too, even with the language barrier. I met him a week ago at Spunk, and he gave me a very sensual lap dance. He was very open to scheduling a private session, but I got sick so I couldn’t follow through. Once I’m back up to speed, I plan on cashing that raincheck.

@JuniorNYC is a very nice man indeed, a great conversationalist, and one heck of a good lay. I pretty much fell in love at our first (and to this point only) meeting last summer. I can’t wait to see him again. I’m sure you’ll have a good time.

Would you even listen to yourself? You don't get to demand that someone meet you face to face, especially when you're acting so nutty on an online forum. Either you're engaging in some grade-A trolling of everyone here, or something is seriously wrong with your coping skills and emotional state. Again, for your own sake, please get some help and move on.

Dude, I don't know anything about your story. I've only been commenting on the original poster's story. You're the one who's conflated his story with yours, when you accused other posters of being James's cheerleaders and of running to him with the OP's story, when you asked if they also told him about "stealing" a client's money and not providing the service for which he was paid. The OP never alleged that. You can start your own thread if you want to solicit feedback on your bad experience with James, but most of us on this thread were not talking about that until you effectively hijacked it with your repeated rants about wanting a $400 refund for an incident for which you've provided virtually no details. None of us are going to jump through hoops to research all of your past posts to gather these details. Say what you will about the OP, but at least he provided us with the relevant details of his experience before soliciting our opinions. You haven't even done that. You are getting way too riled up here, to the point that you're not even engaging in rational discussion anymore, but you're instead insulting folks and pleading for a conversation and/or resolution with someone who clearly wants nothing more to do with you. For your own sake, please just let this go, and find a way to be happy and fulfilled outside of your experiences with escorts and fighting with unknown forum members. This is not a good look.

In the words of the young ones online: GTFOH with that nonsense. When someone's already screwed you over once before, but you give him a 2nd chance anyway, you are under no obligation to bend over backwards to give him the benefit of the doubt when it looks like he's screwed you over yet again. Contrary to what you've said before, that doesn't reflect poorly on James's character. To the contrary, standing up for one's self and not letting others take advantage of you shows strength of character. I probably never would have accepted a 2nd appointment with the not-so-good doctor, but if I had, I'd have waited no more than just a few minutes after he told me to "come now." James gave him 15, which was more than enough. Could he have waited longer? Sure, but he was under no obligation to do so, especially late at night, during winter, and in an unfamiliar neighborhood in a city he doesn't live in. There's a difference between being exceedingly nice, and being a pushover. Under these circumstances it was definitely reasonable for James to conclude that he'd been taken for a ride yet again, given how the doctor acted the first time. Stop with the BS excuses.

Does strawberry blond count? If so, I'd recommend https://rent.men/Russelll, who's based in NYC. He's very hairy, and makes it a point not to manscape. There's also https://rent.men/NYCViking, also based in NYC. He's quite hairy too, but he's a darker blond (his body hair is closer to light brown, while his facial hair is blond). Plus, out in Los Angeles, there's https://rent.men/BlondViking. He's not as hairy as the guys listed above, but his manscaping is minimal (if he even trims at all), as he seems to maintain a normal amount of body hair for an adult man. His hair's also very light blond, so it kind of looks like it "glows" off of his skin, if that's part of the fetish for you. If I can think of any more, I'll post again on this thread.

Even more B.S. You cannot truthfully state, with any reasonable degree of certainty, that James "was not at my door." Why? Because you were brushing your teeth for 15 freaking minutes after you told someone to "come now" rather than wait 12 minutes until the original time you'd agreed to meet. Since you never went down in a timely manner to retrieve your guest, you cannot possibly know whether he was there at 11:17 when he texted you, 11:18 when you responded, or within a few minutes after that. All you know is that he wasn't there at 11:33 when you texted him asking where he was. The notion that a professional (or anyone, really) should wait around for 15 minutes late at night in the dead of a New York winter, and then just proceed with an appointment and discount the time that you made him freeze outside in an unfamiliar neighborhood, all while he looked like a loiterer, lest he reveal (according to you and one other poster) poor character, displays such a lack of consideration, arrogance, and entitlement. The very fact that you stubbornly insist that you're in the right, here, is proof positive of this. I'm not a cheerleader for James. I've never met or spoken with him, nor am I into muscle worship. So, he's not the kind of guy I'm typically into, or that I'd hire. I have no horse in this race, so to speak. This is just about right and wrong, and you, sir, are entirely in the wrong.

I'm sorry, but that makes no sense. Based on the portion of the texts you showed us, it's clear that James arrived a mere 13 minutes early, asked if he should come now or wait until your original 11:30 appointment, and you then told him to "come now". He did exactly as he was told, and then you didn't show up for apparently the second time. You next contacted him a full 15 minutes later with a BS excuse that you were brushing your teeth. Literally no one takes that long just to brush their teeth. If you needed the extra time you should have just told him to stick to the original 11:30 appointment time. Plus, it's winter now, and you shouldn't expect someone to wait outside in the cold while you take your time after you'd just told them to come now. Once you did that, it was only reasonable for him to expect you to arrive immediately, not 15 minutes later. It is absolutely not believable that you thought that James was asking about leaving to come to your Brooklyn home from Manhattan, when he texted you only 13 minutes before your original 11:30 appt to ask if he should come now or wait until 11:30. If James really was asking about leaving from Manhattan, why would he ask about coming now or at 11:30, when it was already 11:17 when he texted you? Sure, there are some parts of Brooklyn that one can reach within 15 minutes from Manhattan. But no one would be asking about coming now or at 11:30 for an 11:30 appt, if he was still a minimum of 15 minutes away and it was already 11:17 at the time they asked you. It's clear that you made up a bad excuse to cover for the fact that you lost track of time for the second time to this escort's detriment, and you then got offended when he decided to cut his losses with you. You owe the man several apologies: for wasting his time on both appointments, and then badmouthing him on this thread when he was the victim of your poor time management. You can also throw in another apology for chiming in on that other thread about James to say that you had a negative experience with him, when everything on this thread has established that you were entirely in the wrong, and it was you who inflicted multiple negative experiences upon him.

I envy you both for finding lovely Argentinean men to fly into the U.S. to spend time with you. My international loves have tended to be Brazilian, and it's damn near impossible for them to get visas to come here. Is there no visa requirement for Argentina nationals?

Our people can throw shade like no one else. I love it!

I corresponded with him when he visited NYC a few weeks ago. He was super nice, and I really appreciated him telling me, after I told him about the scene I was looking for, that he wasn't sure if we'd be a good fit. I think that demonstrates a certain level of professionalism, because he could have easily attempted to play a role for which he feels he's ill-suited, just to get paid. Instead, he seemed to care about my satisfaction and delivering for me. I'm tempted to see him on his next visit for a more vanilla scene just because I'm so touched by the consideration he showed me.

Okay, so several forum members have established that posting a URL in a thread title renders it nonfunctional as a link for the most popular browsers, such as Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, Firefox, Safari, and the mobile phone versions of these browsers. In contrast, only one person (the original poster) has said that he can tap on a URL in a thread title and that it works as a link. So, with respect to the need or desire for a functional link so as to respond to a 411 request, by a ratio of 6 or 7 to 1, the people have spoken. Now we know - links go in the body of threads, and not in the title. Lesson learned. Moving on, the escort asked about is very handsome, but despite having several reviews on RM, he doesn't seem to have any on Daddy's and no forum member seems to have any experience. That's a shame. Hopefully, someone here takes a flier on this escort and can report back to help the OP or any other viewers of this thread (like myself) who liked the escort's ad.

He probably thought he did so by putting the url in the thread title. Perhaps he didn't realize that would render it non-functional as a link. I'd imagine that the lesson has been learned.

I met with Russell last spring. He's a total sweetheart.