joegr2000

I am reminded of old Looney Tunes Cartoons.

There is a difference in denying service once a person is there and informing them that service will not be rendered in the future.  What I did was standard of care for patient's dismissed from a practice for whatever reason.  Care was rendered.  The patient was informed they had 30 days to find another provider and in the interim care would be rendered if needed.  They were addressed in person and in writing.  
As I said, if this were a critically ill patient, they would not have been an issue.  As it was, even a mild illness was treated and the patient given time to make other arrangements.  
I believe there is a significant difference between a doctor and the person for whom he is caring as opposed to a baker and his cake purchaser.   Eventually, the baker won his case at the level of the Supreme court.  
In addition, I suppose I would treat all my large swastika tattoo having patients the same way, they hardly compare in number to the groups you sited. i believe he was the only one in 40 years of medical care.   In the US, they are not a group recognized as a minority deserving of legal protection.  
Similarly, if one opts not to hire an escort once they know information about them which they find offensive, the escort is not being discriminated against, he is reaping the fruit of his actions.  

I would never have hired him as on the whole I don't/didnt  hire straight tops-or straight bottoms-at least not knowingly (a few might have slipped through, and there was that guy from Philadelphia that I was mightily tempted too hire but ultimately didn't).  And I am doubly glad of that now that I've read his Twitter. 
I'll have to disagree with your point of view-and not even respectfully. That kind of filth I saw on his Twitter (X)  feed doesn't need to be promoted. Hiring him and giving him money just gives him the wherewithal to spread his filth. Why would you want to support that?
 
And yes if I knew a repairman -even the best in the city with those kind of ideas-and I had a broken refrigerator-I'd chose a less skilled repairman. It comes down to how do we want the world to be. And why would you (or at least myself) want to actively support evil. 
 
But of course you're free to do what you like because. The interesting thing is Jaxton wouldn't return the favor. 

English is indeed my Mother Tongue. As Shakespeare said, "I do desire we may be better strangers. More of your conversation would infect my brain."

It is how we act on the information that we have that measures us as human beings.  Not knowing his beliefs is one thing. Knowing them and hiring him anyway, is quite another.  I have told this in the past.  I had a patient come in to my walk in center and he seemed as though he were a perfectly attractive twenty something with a minor medical problem.  During the course of the examination, I went to listen to his lungs and he had a very large swastika tattoo on his back.  I continued the examination and treated him as I would any other patient.   As he was leaving, I told him that while he seemed to be a very nice young man, he would be receiving a letter from us that he should find another medical care provider as we would not be caring for him after 30 days of that notice.  I very explicitly told him that his tattoo was so offensive to me, that I did not believe I could look past that.   He confronted me for it and I simply said, I will not offer care to someone to whom I can not offer care confidently and compassionately and that tattoo caused me to think that would be the case if I continued caring for him.  
If I happened upon someone in a more dire straight, I would not turn them away no matter their beliefs or tattoos, but given a situtation which there is a professional option, I chose to take it.  
He made some unflattering remark though not vulgar and left.  He never returned.  
I believe that had I not seen that tattoo there would not have been an issue, but once I did, I was faced with a professional and moral dilemma as are the people here who are debating hiring this person or not.  Ultimately, one has to set standards for oneself.  Some people can live with hiring this man and some cannot.  Neither is right nor wrong, only different.  

His views are not merely "personal views on social or political topics." They are bigoted and dehumanizing. The analogy to a lawyer or a doctor or an Uber driver is disingenuous an preposterous. You hire an escort for intimate sexual acts, involving vulnerability and trust. I would no sooner want his dick in my mouth than I would the dick of a KKK member or a neo-Nazi.
As far as I'm concerned, he has bad as that or worse.

Social media is a public platform, the virtual soapbox on the streetcorner. I agree it would be silly and rather pointless to try to vet potential hires for their social and political views if those views aren't publicly blasted on Twitter or whatever, or became part of our interaction. But if said hire makes it a point to blast his filth publicly it becomes part of the package. It's tells us who and what he is. A provider like that would be a hard no for me no matter how attractive physically.

Definitely live and let live, and I trust you know my reply wasn't meant as a judgement in any way.  I have likely hired all sorts of people, from gardeners to car mechanics, and musicians to accountants, who might very well have views that I would find offensive or even dangerous.  But I haven't knowingly done so - if any of them were public about their views, I would have chosen someone else.  And if I found out after the fact, I would choose someone else the next time.  I don't screen or do any deep dives on people, but if something was made known to me and I could confirm it, that would be something I would have to consider in making decisions.  But that's just how I approach it, and I don't expect everyone to see it the way I do.  

Yikes! He's a vicious anti-semite!

I met him at least 25 years ago.  I was disappointed, because he was supposed to be the #1 escort, and I just felt, he's nice looking but not very sexy.  Obviously, a lot of others found him hot.

Next time, let the guy go...your fight could have ended up costing you a lot more than $400.   Think with your big head.

Next time, let the guy go...your fight could have ended up costing you a lot more than $400.   Think with your big head.

I can’t get past seeing a young Marco Rubio in some of his pics. . 

This has been one of my favorites 

Next time, let the guy go...your fight could have ended up costing you a lot more than $400.   Think with your big head.

Next time, let the guy go...your fight could have ended up costing you a lot more than $400.   Think with your big head.

yeah you mentioned how terrible they are, your opinion is yours. and honestly it seems rude and condescending. Everyone has a different way of expressing themselves. I am not a career escort. I can promote myself however I see fit. Please be nice. The world needs kindness
 

Maybe a forbidden topic...but it is warm and sultry in NYC and I am a piss top, and a piss bottom...so...escorts in NYC who drink from the tap? Voraciously? And eagerly enjoy a good piss fuck? 💦💦💦🐷🐷🐷😈😈😈🤷🏻‍♂️🤷🏻‍♂️🤷🏻‍♂️

OMG...he's gorgeous!

I met him at least 25 years ago.  I was disappointed, because he was supposed to be the #1 escort, and I just felt, he's nice looking but not very sexy.  Obviously, a lot of others found him hot.

I met him at least 25 years ago.  I was disappointed, because he was supposed to be the #1 escort, and I just felt, he's nice looking but not very sexy.  Obviously, a lot of others found him hot.

I met him a few years ago.  HIGHLY recommend.  He was lots of fun and as down to earth as possible.  Smart, sexy, sweet.

I love that photo. The book was on the coffee table in the lobby of the hotel I was staying at in Palm Springs last month and grabbed a pic… 
 

yes