Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 4 months later...
Guest ReservedMan
Posted (edited)

I met him. Not what I was expecting. Paid and left within 5 minutes. Nice enough guy not what I was looking for. Most texting from the escort I have ever had. The pictures make you expect a buffer specimen than reality. 

Edited by ReservedMan
Clarity
Posted

He's been advertising as a massuer in Las Vegas for as long as I can remember.  I had one bad experience with him 15 years ago... He didn't look like his pictures and barely rubbed much less tugged, took the money and left.  Even back then he looked 15-20 years older than his pictures.  Back in the Craig's List days for massage he would reach out to me with different names but always the same chest photograph and same telephone number.  I hadn't seen him on RentMen in a while because he blocked me several years back after I declined his services after he reached out to me.

Guest ReservedMan
Posted
1 hour ago, TJMS said:

How do you explain his 96 reviews? That is a large number.

Everyone has his own opinions. If others find him terrific great for them. I can honestly say I would not book a second meeting because the picture did not match the actual fellow. He too blocked me after our meeting so I would not be able to leave a bad review; that would be one way to keep a high score. Lastly, I think he followed up with a lot of texts because he had a live one on the hook and didn't want to let him slip away. 

  • 1 year later...
Posted
1 hour ago, Chien Andalou said:

I don’t think I have ever contacted him, much less met. However, I still find that he blocked me. Doesn’t sound as if I’m missing out. 

He blocked me too

Posted

Interesting. I just went to view his profile and he’s got me blocked. I travel to Vegas occasionally and I may or may not have looked at his profile in years past as a possible hire. From what I’m reading above I am not missing anything. 

Posted (edited)

I hate to speculate, but he must not be interested in meeting with any potential customer that has a RentMen account.

Given that he performs lousy rubs and must look at least 30 years older than his torso picture by now, he must only be interested in nervous first-timer tourists without RentMen accounts who don't have experience hiring good escorts and therefore won't know to send him away when he arrives and looks nothing like his pictures, and then also not know to never pay up front.

Edited by Vegas_Millennial
Posted
6 minutes ago, Vegas_Millennial said:

I hate to speculate, but he must not be interested in meeting with any potential customer that has a RentMen account.

Given that he performs lousy rubs and must look at least 30 years older than his torso picture by now, he must only be interested in nervous first-timer tourists without RentMen accounts who don't have experience hiring good escorts and therefore won't know to send him away when he arrives and looks nothing like his pictures, and then also not know to never pay up front.

I was that tourist two years ago… you nailed it. 

Posted

That’s why I have an age limit of 29. That way I usually don’t have to be worried about being disappointed and if I walk in and they are a lot older than 29 I go thank you very much.

Posted

I have to add I met him a few years ago and he does not look like his profile pictures at all. I stayed for the session out of politeness. He asked me if we could actually date for real since I am also a Las Vegas local. I declined… he blocked me before I could leave a review.

Posted
17 hours ago, Vegas_Millennial said:

I hate to speculate, but he must not be interested in meeting with any potential customer that has a RentMen account.

Given that he performs lousy rubs and must look at least 30 years older than his torso picture by now, he must only be interested in nervous first-timer tourists without RentMen accounts who don't have experience hiring good escorts and therefore won't know to send him away when he arrives and looks nothing like his pictures, and then also not know to never pay up front.

I have different account names for the sites and I don’t allow either site to record my visits. I have also never left anything other than a five-star review. (Unless it’s a 1 or 5 star experience, I won’t review on those sites. Here is a different story; I will give a more nuanced assessment.) Maybe he simply blocks anyone who has gone to the effort to ever review anyone at all? He knows the only reviews he’ll get are shitty, so he’s being proactive. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...