*EastVillageTwunk - NYC

[+ KensingtonHomo]

On 8/13/2025 at 10:36 PM, Callas said:

Feeling guilty for initiating a drama, I gave him a try before it’s “there” 😈

More handsome than pics; very nice hair, superman-like hairstyle but a bit longer fits him well (without the first minus + chest hair, he could have been my type)

Big & tall as I imagined

Passionate kisser

Good r*mming 

Smooth skin, and nice body

One of the best 🍑 in NYC

Very nice straight 🍆, ~8” and big enough, but the mushroom could be a bit bigger

Satisfied all my requests and beyond. Very nice & sweet

 

Minus:
- not masculine, but he is cute
- chest and arms are not there 
- eyebrows are unnaturally sharp (this is the bigger minus than the other two)

 

Verdict: He’s worth the rate as of now and repeating when chest is there

 

I love that you took the plunge. 

Was he vers or a bottom? I like his look, but I'm getting a bottom vibe (also, you can't get tops to shut up about it). He's also a bit young for my taste but I like his chest hair. 

[+ Twinkluvr]

Shave the chest hair and sharpen the eyebrows more and we are good to go!  I would also put “not masculine “ in the plus category.  Gimme a femme boy any day.

[pubic_assistance]

11 hours ago, Twinkluvr said:

Shave the chest hair and sharpen the eyebrows

....Maybe throw in some panties and a bra. 🙄...NO.

I think he's quite nice just as he is. 

Edited Monday at 03:08 PM by pubic_assistance
grammar

[+ Twinkluvr]

8 hours ago, pubic_assistance said:

....Maybe throw in some panties and a bra. 🙄...NO.

I think he's quite nice just as he is. 

Yes please!  Will pay extra for that

Edited Monday at 10:34 PM by Twinkluvr

[pubic_assistance]

40 minutes ago, Twinkluvr said:

Will pay extra for that

🤢

[+ KensingtonHomo]

3 minutes ago, pubic_assistance said:

🤢

I'm guessing this also isn't internalized homophobia with a dash of femmephobia and misogyny, right? 

[pubic_assistance]

10 minutes ago, KensingtonHomo said:

I'm guessing this also isn't internalized homophobia with a dash of femmephobia and misogyny, right? 

Your cheap psychoanalysis is off yet again. I enjoy homosexuals. The revulsion of effeminate men is the stronger impulse. Its more than just "a dash".

You keep insisting that I should have no preferences because YOU and your husband will fuck anything that moves. We all have our types and thats really ok. The fun here is to discuss our likes and dislikes and get to know one another. Everyone is unique. And thats what makes this forum interesting.

Edited Monday at 11:27 PM by pubic_assistance
grammar

[+ Gar1eth]

On 8/13/2025 at 9:36 PM, Callas said:

Minus:
- not masculine, but he is cute
- chest and arms are not there 
- eyebrows are unnaturally sharp (this is the bigger minus than the other two)

 

Verdict: He’s worth the rate as of now and repeating when chest is there

 

Did he tell you he was working on his chest-or are you just hoping? 

[+ KensingtonHomo]

1 minute ago, pubic_assistance said:

The revulsion of effeminate men is the stronger impulse. Its more than just "a dash".

This is literally the definition of internalized homophobia. We have preferences, which I've stated repeatedly and are apparent if you look at the providers I've reviewed. We have a broader palette than you're very narrow one. But most of all, I do not feel the need to constantly shit on what other people find attractive or sexy. 

I also don't do "cheap psychoanalysis." I comment on the intersection of socio-economic and historical trends in gender and sexuality in Western culture because it's one of my areas of expertise. Femme boys were once the toast of the town and they're coming back into style. 🤣

[pubic_assistance]

2 hours ago, KensingtonHomo said:

Femme boys were once the toast of the town and they're coming back into style. 🤣

What town was that ?

I dont think East Village Twunk looks effeminate at all. So this whole conversation is getting way off the subject. He has much more of a "boy-next-door" vibe in his photos. 

Edited Tuesday at 02:18 AM by pubic_assistance
grammar

[+ KensingtonHomo]

54 minutes ago, pubic_assistance said:

What town was that ?

I dont think East Village Twunk looks effeminate at all. So this whole conversation is getting way off the subject. He has much more of a "boy-next-door" vibe in his photos. 

Throughout most of history, in all the towns, same-sex couples had a butch/femme dynamic. All you need to do to see this is read books and watch films. 

And it's not that EVT looks feminine in his photos, though his eyebrows are c*nt; it's that the only person on this thread who's met him said he wasn't masculine. 

[guru68]

2 hours ago, pubic_assistance said:

What town was that ?

I dont think East Village Twunk looks effeminate at all. So this whole conversation is getting way off the subject. He has much more of a "boy-next-door" vibe in his photos. 

Were he next door, I would ask him to help me flip my mattress - possibly with me on it.

[pubic_assistance]

9 hours ago, KensingtonHomo said:

Throughout most of history, in all the towns, same-sex couples had a butch/femme dynamic.

Ah ! sorry. I didn't realize you were speaking about Lesbians. 

[Asterisk]

12 hours ago, KensingtonHomo said:

Throughout most of history, in all the towns, same-sex couples had a butch/femme dynamic. All you need to do to see this is read books and watch films. 

And it's not that EVT looks feminine in his photos, though his eyebrows are c*nt; it's that the only person on this thread who's met him said he wasn't masculine. 

Ah, heteronormativity -- will we never be rid of you?  (There are many examples without a butch/femme dynamic or, more likely, too many ill-informed straight opinions about gay couples.)

But at root I agree -- don't yuck on someone else's yum.

Also grateful to the member with first-hand knowledge -- and who offered further opinions that allow members to decide for themselves how much they concur (and the other member who decreed EVTwunk a bottom after seeing him on the subway).  "Masculine" is subjective -- maybe your perspective syncs with his, maybe it doesn't. 

[BrklynNYC]

45 minutes ago, Asterisk said:

Ah, heteronormativity -- will we never be rid of you?  (There are many examples without a butch/femme dynamic or, more likely, too many ill-informed straight opinions about gay couples.)

But at root I agree -- don't yuck on someone else's yum.

Also grateful to the member with first-hand knowledge -- and who offered further opinions that allow members to decide for themselves how much they concur (and the other member who decreed EVTwunk a bottom after seeing him on the subway).  "Masculine" is subjective -- maybe your perspective syncs with his, maybe it doesn't. 

I did not decree him as being a bottom. I asked him his preference. 

[pubic_assistance]

1 hour ago, Asterisk said:

too many ill-informed straight opinions about gay couples

The classic: "which one's the woman in the relationship" ...