Reviews

[ncc1701d]

Seem to recall there were going to be a resurrection of the reviews section on this site? The link is to the old one....is there still one?

[Cretus]

I personally vote against having an official reviews section. Without some costly barrier (such as making reviews available only to donors), escorts themselves could come in here to falsely boost their own reputations, as some already seem to do in the informal 411s.

 

Edited July 17 by Cretus

[+ Vegas_Millennial]

14 hours ago, ncc1701d said:

Seem to recall there were going to be a resurrection of the reviews section on this site? The link is to the old one....is there still one?

This is not really a Question About Hiring, but rather a question about Our Website.

The latest update on the Reviews section of Company of Men is here, just a few topics down in "Our Website" section: 

 

 

[ncc1701d]

Thanks...looked under our site but not the feedback part as not that intuitive. So good know it's there now

[mike carey]

11 hours ago, Cretus said:

I personally vote against having an official reviews section. Without some costly barrier (such as making reviews available only to donors), escorts themselves could come in here to falsely boost their own reputations, as some already seem to do in the informal 411s.

 

The reviews section,, as it operated in the past, and as is envisaged when it can be restarted is not another forum with threads like this. Reviews had to be approved, and posting a review was not (and would not be) the start of a debate about the escort. Members would be able to write a review, to which the escort would have the right of reply, but that would be the end of it. There would be no further discussion in the review section, that discussion would only be permitted in the Deli Forum.

[liubit]

The conditions described by @mike carey were precisely what made the review site so reliable and useful. It was a gold mine for our hobby.