Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, Peter Eater said:

Was there a meeting of media execs to decide this and carry out the decision? 

No need for a conspiracy theory—it’s called systemic bias. Media reflects societal preferences, which are shaped by historical power structures, and they reinforce each other. But sure, imagine the boardroom scene if it helps you grasp the concept.

Posted
8 minutes ago, ApexNomad said:

No need for a conspiracy theory—it’s called systemic bias. Media reflects societal preferences, which are shaped by historical power structures, and they reinforce each other. But sure, imagine the boardroom scene if it helps you grasp the concept.

Nah. It is an understandably common misconception that our ideas of beauty come from cultural influences such as movies and magazines. Most of us believe that we are “taught” what is beautiful based on the images presented to us throughout our life. If this were true, that would mean that what defines attractiveness would differ based on culture and era.

More important are simple scientific fundamentals like symmetry, the extent to which one half of an object is the same as the other half. Our faces are not exactly the same on both halves. Symmetry is one of those qualities that consistently rates as desirable across cultures. Media did not teach us that.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Peter Eater said:

Nah. It is an understandably common misconception that our ideas of beauty come from cultural influences such as movies and magazines. Most of us believe that we are “taught” what is beautiful based on the images presented to us throughout our life. If this were true, that would mean that what defines attractiveness would differ based on culture and era.

More important are simple scientific fundamentals like symmetry, the extent to which one half of an object is the same as the other half. Our faces are not exactly the same on both halves. Symmetry is one of those qualities that consistently rates as desirable across cultures. Media did not teach us that.

Interesting theory, but it’s not the full picture. Symmetry may play a role in universal attractiveness, but cultural ideals absolutely influence what is desirable at any given time. If beauty were purely biological, standards wouldn’t shift so drastically—even within the gay community. Think Tom of Finland’s hyper-masculine fantasy men of the 70s, the lean and androgynous twink aesthetic of the early 2000s, or today’s gym-sculpted internet influencers. Media amplifies and reinforces these trends, creating a feedback loop of aspiration. Biology sets the baseline, but culture shapes the narrative.

Posted
49 minutes ago, Peter Eater said:

Nah. It is an understandably common misconception that our ideas of beauty come from cultural influences such as movies and magazines. Most of us believe that we are “taught” what is beautiful based on the images presented to us throughout our life. If this were true, that would mean that what defines attractiveness would differ based on culture and era.

More important are simple scientific fundamentals like symmetry, the extent to which one half of an object is the same as the other half. Our faces are not exactly the same on both halves. Symmetry is one of those qualities that consistently rates as desirable across cultures. Media did not teach us that.

If cultural influences didn't matter, you wouldn't ever meet a guy who insists he isn't at all attracted to guys of a certain race or of certain ethnicities.

Posted (edited)
23 hours ago, dutchal said:

If cultural influences didn't matter, you wouldn't ever meet a guy who insists he isn't at all attracted to guys of a certain race or of certain ethnicities.

Or Goodness forbid... You wouldn't meet a man not attracted to an entire sex!  (Not attracted to women, not attracted to men, etc.).  I didn't need to see gays portrayed in the media to know I was attracted to men and not attracted to women.  There are several body types AND attitudes of men I don't find attractive.... And I didn't need media to tell me who IS an asshole, or who HAS an attractive one.  😜 I determined that on my own.

I will concede that certain cultures, regions, and professions have different practices or skill sets in the bedroom, and that may influence who I find attractive in the future.  For example, I've not met a flight attendant yet who has failed to be outstanding in bed.  It must be their service culture.

Edited by Vegas_Millennial
Posted

I had a lesbian supervisor tell me that if the actor who portrayed Aquaman were to come in to the office shirtless, she would jump at the opportunity to be "bi for a moment". The power of attraction!

The OP is asking the unanswerable. What floats my boat can repel others. I personally find men in love with themselves to be among the most attractive. In the Social Media age, there's more than ever. 

Posted
22 hours ago, dutchal said:

If cultural influences didn't matter, you wouldn't ever meet a guy who insists he isn't at all attracted to guys of a certain race or of certain ethnicities.

No one said “cultural influences don’t matter.” Cultural influences are just that - influences, not primary causes.

Posted
22 hours ago, ApexNomad said:

Interesting theory, but it’s not the full picture.

No one said it was “the full picture.” Symmetry was presented as a single example — “scientific fundamentals like symmetry,” and “one of those qualities.” The words fundamentals and qualities are plural. 

Posted
48 minutes ago, Peter Eater said:

No one said it was “the full picture.” Symmetry was presented as a single example — “scientific fundamentals like symmetry,” and “one of those qualities.” The words fundamentals and qualities are plural. 

What’s your argument?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Peter Eater said:

See above.

Do you want to have a real discussion, or are you just interested in throwing pithy remarks around and dancing around semantics? You mentioned scientific fundamentals, like symmetry—care to expand on that, or is that your entire argument?

Posted
17 minutes ago, ApexNomad said:

Do you want to have a real discussion, or are you just interested in throwing pithy remarks around and dancing around semantics? You mentioned scientific fundamentals, like symmetry—care to expand on that, or is that your entire argument?

I was having “a real discussion,” you misrepresented my comment, I politely corrected you, you ignored the correction - end of discussion. I am not interested in preparing a dissertation for you to continue to misrepresent and/or ignore. Why bother?

And now, back to our regularly scheduled post on who the handsome men are…

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Peter Eater said:

I was having “a real discussion,” you misrepresented my comment, I politely corrected you, you ignored the correction - end of discussion. I am not interested in preparing a dissertation for you to continue to misrepresent and/or ignore. Why bother?

And now, back to our regularly scheduled post on who the handsome men are…

 

 

On 1/15/2025 at 9:54 AM, Peter Eater said:

Was there a meeting of media execs to decide this and carry out the decision? 

Because this is you wanting to have a real discussion, right? I agree with you on one thing—why bother.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Muscleking said:

Isn’t he bttm ? His profile says top?

What a porn actor does on a screen doesn’t necessarily translate to what they do as a provider or their home life.

Not saying he doesn’t bottom for select clients but it’s definitely not his initial stance.

 I got the impression that once he gets comfortable with a client he may be willing to do more. His original ad copy kind of reflected that. He used have a blurb about being shy at first and being more outgoing when you got to know him.

Edited by big-n-tall
Posted

Lots of really good looking men being discussed that I could go for. My current favorite masseur is Karl Kang...my preference being young Asian twunks. I don't know how many on this site have a similar taste, but I wanted to post at least one representative of the genre. 

RENTMASSEUR.COM

Gay Masseur karlkang in San Francisco, CA offering a wide range of massages experienced in...

 

Posted
On 1/16/2025 at 1:20 PM, big-n-tall said:

What a porn actor does on a screen doesn’t necessarily translate to what they do as a provider or their home life.

Not saying he doesn’t bottom for select clients but it’s definitely not his initial stance.

 I got the impression that once he gets comfortable with a client he may be willing to do more. His original ad copy kind of reflected that. He used have a blurb about being shy at first and being more outgoing when you got to know him.

I just have never seen him top in any of his videos so a little strange that he would be only top for escort.. I would assume most his clients would want to fuck him 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...