POWER BOTTOM FRESH TO MARKET

[robberbaron4u]

https://rentmen.eu/EvinAlexsander

[+ azdr0710]

Just because it's you, RB4U.......

https://rent.men/EvinAlexsander

[ShortCutie7]

Hot!!!  Are the five stars just based on his profile or from meeting him?

[jonnychgo]

He needs an OF or JFF

[wanderlust307]

He is fat and not good looking. 

[robberbaron4u]

30 minutes ago, wanderlust307 said:

He is fat and not good looking. 

He is very "cheeky", figuratively and, in his physical presentation, literally.  With particular regard to your remark, I would define him as a "wholesome hunk". In my opinion, of course; please toss no sticks or stones my way.

[BrickBuilder]

46 minutes ago, wanderlust307 said:

He is fat and not good looking. 

Wow.....its one thing to say "He is not my type" or "Not my cup of tea" but to be downright nasty (and yes that is how I view your comment) is just rude.  

I really thought this was a place to share in a community manner.  Guess not everyone subscribes to that philosophy.

[robberbaron4u]

On the other hand, the situation could be one of a "fat and not good looking" man paying a compliment to a man he perceives, through a jaundiced eye, to be comparable to him in his physical presentation. 

Edited August 22, 2024 by robberbaron4u

[topunderachiever]

1 hour ago, wanderlust307 said:

He is fat and not good looking. 

Stop doing this.

It's a disgusting habit of yours.  

[Walt]

1 hour ago, wanderlust307 said:

He is fat and not good looking. 

Are you in third grade? It's one thing if he "is not your type," but it's no reason to insult someone.

[wanderlust307]

What's wrong with you guys? Can't you see the obvious? This is not even a matter of personal taste. Its objective. He is ugly.

And he says he is 180cm and 93Kg. This is by definition fat. A rule of thumb is that someone 180 tall should be 80 minus 10, ie 70Kgs to be average.

[robberbaron4u]

5 minutes ago, wanderlust307 said:

What's wrong with you guys? Can't you see the obvious? This is not even a matter of personal taste. Its objective. He is ugly.

And he says he is 180cm and 93Kg. This is by definition fat. A rule of thumb is that someone 180 tall should be 80 minus 10, ie 70Kgs to be average.

Down, Fido! Having inspected him "close up" in person, my determination is that he presents, physically and in his manner, very nicely. 

[marylander1940]

1 hour ago, wanderlust307 said:

He is fat and not good looking. 

 

He has a beefy ass with a pink butthole and most tops find that attractive!

FAT?! Get some windex!

 

Edited August 22, 2024 by marylander1940

[caramelsub]

4 minutes ago, wanderlust307 said:

What's wrong with you guys? Can't you see the obvious? This is not even a matter of personal taste. Its objective. He is ugly.

And he says he is 180cm and 93Kg. This is by definition fat. A rule of thumb is that someone 180 tall should be 80 minus 10, ie 70Kgs to be average.

I think he is hot. He has a beautiful ass. Beauty/sexiness is subjective. There are plenty of guys that people on this site rave about, that are not my type. But this guy is definitely not one of them. I wouldn’t hire him because he appears to be on the sub/bottom side, so we probably would clash.

[marylander1940]

13 minutes ago, wanderlust307 said:

What's wrong with you guys? Can't you see the obvious? This is not even a matter of personal taste. Its objective. He is ugly.

And he says he is 180cm and 93Kg. This is by definition fat. A rule of thumb is that someone 180 tall should be 80 minus 10, ie 70Kgs to be average.

Ugly is in the eyes of the beholder.

I guarantee you he can get laid on Grindr easily! 

[Bokomaru]

23 minutes ago, wanderlust307 said:

What's wrong with you guys? Can't you see the obvious? This is not even a matter of personal taste. Its objective. He is ugly.

There’s something ugly on this thread, but it’s not the provider. 
 

[myophile]

1 hour ago, wanderlust307 said:

What's wrong with you guys? Can't you see the obvious? This is not even a matter of personal taste. Its objective. He is ugly.

And he says he is 180cm and 93Kg. This is by definition fat. A rule of thumb is that someone 180 tall should be 80 minus 10, ie 70Kgs to be average.

Huh. Poor baby, did he block you? Make fun of your equipment? Overcharge you? Tell mama how he hurt you!

[wanderlust307]

14 minutes ago, myophile said:

Huh. Poor baby, did he block you? Make fun of your equipment? Overcharge you? Tell mama how he hurt you!

Vom vom vom 🤮

Edited August 22, 2024 by wanderlust307

[myophile]

1 hour ago, wanderlust307 said:

 

And he says he is 180cm and 93Kg. This is by definition fat. A rule of thumb is that someone 180 tall should be 80 minus 10, ie 70Kgs to be average.

…and sorry, but that is a LAUGHABLY ignorant statement. The kid has some serious muscle under that modest padding, which accounts for his ca. 200 lb. weight, at about 5’10” tall. Your “rule of thumb,” aka BMI (body mass index) is a bullshit measurement when applied to any male with significant muscle mass, because the overly simplistic formula does not distinguish fat, which is less dense/heavy relative to size, from muscle, which is far more dense/heavy relative to size. Were he not muscular, his stats would indicate obesity; but he IS muscular, so his BMI means nothing.

[myophile]

On 8/22/2024 at 11:56 AM, wanderlust307 said:

Mod Note: Quoted post hidden and redacted.

Go right ahead, bro — marshal your facts, and prove me wrong. 

[robberbaron4u]

On 8/22/2024 at 11:56 AM, wanderlust307 said:

Mod Note: Quoted post hidden and redacted.

Hmmm...does "takes one to know one" apply to this particular post?

[myophile]

2 minutes ago, robberbaron4u said:

Hmmm...does "takes one to know one" apply to this particular post?

Seems likely, doesn’t it?

[wanderlust307]

1 minute ago, robberbaron4u said:

Hmmm...does "takes one to know one" apply to this particular post?

You said that already once. To satisfy your curiosity my stats are 183, 74. 

[myophile]

1 minute ago, wanderlust307 said:

You said that already once. To satisfy your curiosity my stats are 183, 74. 

Ah. The technical term for that body type is “skinny-fat.” My sympathies!

[wanderlust307]

Just now, myophile said:

Ah. The technical term for that body type is “skinny-fat.” My sympathies!

Well at least it has a skinny part thank god. I really dislike the muscle-fat ones.