Traveling providers who are outcall only, or busy the whole time.

[viewing ownly]

With more hotels than ever before scrutinizing elevator trips to rooms, is this leading to people who are available NOT wanting to meet clients on the ground level? A couple of different traveling men recently really caught me off guard when they asked me if I could host. I said I couldn't, and that bewildered me. 

I feel it's common sense if an escort or masseur is traveling, it would be a no-brainer that meeting them would be in the hotel room that they're staying in. I know that Security CLEARLY knows I'm not a registered hotel guest of the person I'm with when I do meet someone there, as I'm trailing a bit behind since I've no idea where their room is, not to mention I'm an old guy and he's young and attractive. 

Another issue I run across is that the advertiser is first and foremost on a vacation, squeezing in a client if time permits being low on their totem pole. Perhaps it's more so to let their clients back home know the time frame they're unavailable more so than seeking clients in the city they're in.

[Jarrod_Uncut]

Well I think there’s an assumption that if an escort is visiting and placing an ad in a city, that he’s automatically staying in a hotel. Let me explain why people need to nix this assumption:

Sometimes when I go to a city: I may be visiting not for the sole purpose of sex work. I may be going to visit a city but staying at a friend’s or relatives. Obviously I can’t have random men coming in and out, and I may not want to gamble on paying for a hotel if I don’t have guaranteed clients.

This is where the deposit logic comes in. Instead of me blowing money recklessly on the possibility of having clients show up to a hotel: I may choose to host for confirmed clients with deposits only, while having a “free” place to stay. But free place to stay 99.9% of time means no hosting clients. Which in my opinion, isn’t really free if it means possibly losing money, but….in some situations it just doesn’t make sense to book a room for the length of time I may be visiting. This way I can save money and not be pressed to find clients who will show up. 
 

Now, there are times where I go to cities and don’t know anyone. In those cases, I generally do book a hotel and pretty much just have to wing it accordingly. But best believe I’m taking deposits because, more and more hotels are charging ME deposits. I can’t just go risk spending on hotels and not having anyone show up. 
 

Like right now: I have $140+50 tied up in hotel deposits where I stayed at last week. It still hasn’t been released to my account. Probably because the holiday. But it’s so annoying. Money I could have accessed over the holiday is tied up, that’s why if I can avoid staying at hotels I will. And the current trip I’m on: all the clients I’ve met have hosted which makes it easier. 

[JamesB]

10 hours ago, viewing ownly said:

With more hotels than ever before scrutinizing elevator trips to rooms, is this leading to people who are available NOT wanting to meet clients on the ground level? A couple of different traveling men recently really caught me off guard when they asked me if I could host. I said I couldn't, and that bewildered me. 

I feel it's common sense if an escort or masseur is traveling, it would be a no-brainer that meeting them would be in the hotel room that they're staying in. I know that Security CLEARLY knows I'm not a registered hotel guest of the person I'm with when I do meet someone there, as I'm trailing a bit behind since I've no idea where their room is, not to mention I'm an old guy and he's young and attractive. 

Another issue I run across is that the advertiser is first and foremost on a vacation, squeezing in a client if time permits being low on their totem pole. Perhaps it's more so to let their clients back home know the time frame they're unavailable more so than seeking clients in the city they're in.

There are some reasons I can think of for this. Some providers travel to cities and stay with friends or relatives making hosting challenging or even impossible. Also keep in mind that providers do take vacations and/or travel with their partner / boyfriend / husband. Some may also opt to earn extra income during their leisure time without it being a dedicated working trip.

[+ DrownedBoy]

The more reviews the travelling provider has, the less likely he is to be available.

Like several here mentioned, sometimes they say they're in a city even though they already have a rich client to take care of them overnight.

Also, travelling providers are a _lot_ more likely to flake.

[Thelatin]

23 hours ago, viewing ownly said:

With more hotels than ever before scrutinizing elevator trips to rooms

Is this actually a thing?  I’ll admit I frequent several nice hotels, and I’m certain the front staff know exactly what I’m doing.  But it’s never been an issue.

[viewing ownly]

9 minutes ago, Thelatin said:

Is this actually a thing?  I’ll admit I frequent several nice hotels, and I’m certain the front staff know exactly what I’m doing.  But it’s never been an issue.

Just the last one I was at, yes. I met the provider on the casino floor, and his room key was verified by a security guard stationed at the entrance to the elevators. I asked the provider about this on the way up, and he said that the hotel was having a major issue with theft, so that is why. 

[Luv2play]

11 hours ago, DrownedBoy said:

The more reviews the travelling provider has, the less likely he is to be available.

Like several here mentioned, sometimes they say they're in a city even though they already have a rich client to take care of them overnight.

Also, travelling providers are a _lot_ more likely to flake.

That has not been my experience at all over the many years I have hired (except one recent appointment where the provider claimed to have gotten food poisoning just before our time). Normally I make the arrangements days in advance so there is little reason for the provider to flake unless that is in his nature. 
 

I vet my selections well so avoid those who have sketchy reviews or none. 

[marylander1940]

17 hours ago, Thelatin said:

Is this actually a thing?  I’ll admit I frequent several nice hotels, and I’m certain the front staff know exactly what I’m doing.  But it’s never been an issue.

they see you and others walk by if they even notice you. Most elevators don't face the lobby but are nearby. 

I'd rather go directly to the room, there was a famous Belgian escort who refused to give his room number till the time of meeting, that was when very few hotels required a keycard to take the elevator. I think it was a control game for him. 

16 hours ago, viewing ownly said:

Just the last one I was at, yes. I met the provider on the casino floor, and his room key was verified by a security guard stationed at the entrance to the elevators. I asked the provider about this on the way up, and he said that the hotel was having a major issue with theft, so that is why. 

verified as in the escort showed his card or the security guard grabbed it, scanned it asked for his room, check the name match, etc. 

Sorry but one thing is just showing it while other is having it verified.

19 hours ago, DrownedBoy said:

The more reviews the travelling provider has, the less likely he is to be available.

Like several here mentioned, sometimes they say they're in a city even though they already have a rich client to take care of them overnight.

Also, travelling providers are a _lot_ more likely to flake.

I respectfully disagree with that generalization. In MHO the younger escorts are the more likely to be flaky. 

On 1/2/2024 at 11:15 PM, viewing ownly said:

With more hotels than ever before scrutinizing elevator trips to rooms, is this leading to people who are available NOT wanting to meet clients on the ground level? A couple of different traveling men recently really caught me off guard when they asked me if I could host. I said I couldn't, and that bewildered me. 

I feel it's common sense if an escort or masseur is traveling, it would be a no-brainer that meeting them would be in the hotel room that they're staying in. I know that Security CLEARLY knows I'm not a registered hotel guest of the person I'm with when I do meet someone there, as I'm trailing a bit behind since I've no idea where their room is, not to mention I'm an old guy and he's young and attractive. 

Another issue I run across is that the advertiser is first and foremost on a vacation, squeezing in a client if time permits being low on their totem pole. Perhaps it's more so to let their clients back home know the time frame they're unavailable more so than seeking clients in the city they're in.

An overwhelming majority of guys who travel stay in hotel rooms and have no issues seeing clients there. 

Nowadays if they plan to go to a city and there's no interest they can always cancel the trip and keep the money of the airfare as a voucher for future flights, most hotels accept cancellations 24 hours before arrival time. 

I know a local escort who twice in his career travel to stay with friends and see clients on the side... unfortunately he told that to potential clients and they disliked it, they felt used by him, he started getting text messages like "you're using us to bank your holidays" etc. Sometimes a white lie is better. I told him, next time just say "you're house sitting for a friend or staying in an Airbnb".