Oklahoma law banning reviews of SW

[+ WmClarke]

A revision of Oklahoma’s prostitution laws earlier this year included the following 

 

from Free Speech Coalition

Quote

The measure makes it unlawful for any person who pays a fee for a sexual encounter to publish a review of that sexual encounter or to publish a review of the pubic area, buttocks, or breasts experienced in the sexual encounter on a website that facilitates, encourages, offers, solicits or promotes sexual conduct with another for a fee. 

Wow. I would fee if it’s been tested in court.

[rvwnsd]

It is good to hear Oklahoma has nothing better to deal with than this nonsense.

[wsc]

If I can write a fictionalized account of an evening with a sex worker, describing the appearance, attributes, attitudes, and appendages thereof, by what stretch of the imagination does the Oklahoma legislature conclude that I can't do the same to describe an actual encounter? Does no one in the Sooner State have a copy of the First Amendment? Or an adequate understanding of the same? 

This is the consequence to the only qualifications for public office being age and residency.

[samhexum]

6 minutes ago, wsc said:

Does no one in the Sooner State have a copy of the First Amendment? Or an adequate understanding of the same? 

No Sooner said than dumb.

[NipLuvr212]

16 hours ago, rvwnsd said:

It is good to hear Oklahoma has nothing better to deal with than this nonsense.

Being the 8th poorest state in the nation, one can easily think of some more fruitful activities for Oklahoma's legislators to engage in.

[+ WmClarke]

A revision of Oklahoma’s prostitution laws earlier this year included the following 

 

from Free Speech Coalition

Quote

The measure makes it unlawful for any person who pays a fee for a sexual encounter to publish a review of that sexual encounter or to publish a review of the pubic area, buttocks, or breasts experienced in the sexual encounter on a website that facilitates, encourages, offers, solicits or promotes sexual conduct with another for a fee. 

Wow. I wonder if it’s been tested in court.

[MikeBiDude]

28 minutes ago, WmClarke said:

A revision of Oklahoma’s prostitution laws earlier this year included the following 

You already posted this topic Saturday? I merged today's repeat with original.

[jeezifonly]

Praise be, at last. 

This will make all the difference for the thousands left homeless by tornadoes and floods every year. 

[+ augustus]

On 10/9/2023 at 1:18 AM, rvwnsd said:

It is good to hear Oklahoma has nothing better to deal with than this nonsense.

The politicians are trying to protect themselves when they get busted.  

[+ WmClarke]

On 10/10/2023 at 5:54 PM, MikeBiDude said:

You already posted this topic Saturday? I merged today's repeat with original.

Sorry about that. I don’t know how that happened!