Jump to content
This topic is 1806 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Posted

Seen a provider few times in SF for $120/hour. MT and HE but not nude. Didn’t bring up to him re nude at all. Just have been playing it by ear. As we started last time, he said that he could be nude for $50 extra. This seems high to me in SF for just nude/MT/HE. I don’t want more and so didn’t press what $ really meant.

 

He knows I can pay given what he knows re me, so I think he’s capitalizing on the market (which I get and understand), but just wanted to see if you guys agree I’m not crazy. Thanks for your thoughts.

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

And what’s your question? I think it was not clear to me. Maybe I missed it.

Seen a provider few times in SF for $120/hour. MT and HE but not nude. Didn’t bring up to him re nude at all. Just have been playing it by ear. As we started last time, he said that he could be nude for $50 extra. This seems high to me in SF for just nude/MT/HE. I don’t want more and so didn’t press what $ really meant.

 

He knows I can pay given what he knows re me, so I think he’s capitalizing on the market (which I get and understand), but just wanted to see if you guys agree I’m not crazy. Thanks for your thoughts.

Posted

I am not sure about the bump but I absolutely expect my masseur to be comfortable being naked with me AND being touched if he charges $160 an hour. It's a deal breaker if this is not the case. Moreover, at that rate, he'd better be a very good masseur and hot too. If one of these two is not the case, the fair rate in my book goes down to $140 or lower. I will tip generously if all goes as planned but a tip is an extra and not an entitlement.

 

I have no use for HE or MT if the masseur is not ready to be naked with me. Then it's a strictly therapeutic massage for which the top rate is $100.

Posted

Question is - is $50 bump high in your opinion for just nude? I think so but wanted to see if I was wrong.... thanks

When they try to up charge mid session is bad practice. They should disclose it before the session.

 

And $170 is in the normal-high side range.

Posted

Yea, that would really get my goat. I hate it when a provider tries to upsell me like I'm renting a car. "For two hundred more you can get leather!" Once had a guy tell me I'd have to pay an extra fifty if I sucked HIS. Gimme a break! If you want the guy to get neeked, ask him to get neeked. Otherwise move on. Life is too short.

Posted

Seen a provider few times in SF for $120/hour. MT and HE but not nude. Didn’t bring up to him re nude at all. Just have been playing it by ear. As we started last time, he said that he could be nude for $50 extra. This seems high to me in SF for just nude/MT/HE. I don’t want more and so didn’t press what $ really meant.

 

He knows I can pay given what he knows re me, so I think he’s capitalizing on the market (which I get and understand), but just wanted to see if you guys agree I’m not crazy. Thanks for your thoughts.

@Sedrruik - you are absolutely not crazy. I would have said to him . . Now that you bring it up, I've been thinking all along that you should have been massaging me naked at the current $120 price.

Posted

I think because he was non nude with the initial massage, he feels he can ask for more for the ”additional service”. Otherwise, i think it might have been best to be establish that nudity is important to you prior to your initial meet. Now, any additional requests would feel like, pardon the words, scope creep.

Posted

Seen a provider few times in SF for $120/hour. MT and HE but not nude. Didn’t bring up to him re nude at all. Just have been playing it by ear. As we started last time, he said that he could be nude for $50 extra. This seems high to me in SF for just nude/MT/HE. I don’t want more and so didn’t press what $ really meant.

 

He knows I can pay given what he knows re me, so I think he’s capitalizing on the market (which I get and understand), but just wanted to see if you guys agree I’m not crazy. Thanks for your thoughts.

I don't know what kind of HE are you having with him wearing clothes on but an additional charge for seeing/touching him nude would depend on what he looks like. If you can't post his ad link here just post an image of his body (the fewer clothes the better) to give us some context.

Posted

If you are a regular you would think he would offer some kind of discount or package rate which would put cash in his pocket. An up charge for nude seems a bit entitled (unless he is porn star hot!)

 

Some people are takers and some are givers. A giver will appreciate regular customers and throw in extras, whether it's more time, nice chat before or after, or some extra connection during the massage. A taker will infer from the repeat business that he is leaving too much value on the table and try to extract more. He'll keep pushing or cutting corners until he finds the limit, at which point it's over, the client is alienated and isn't coming back.

 

Things are of course made better or worse depending on whether one likes or dislikes what he does, and further complicated by the fact that the client can also be a giver or a taker.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...