wsc

I, too, am somewhat amazed, as well as profoundly grateful, that this site survived Daddy's sad and too soon death, and agree completely that those who stepped in to salvage and administer the site have performed a tremendously well done service for us all and deserve our undying applause and appreciation. To clarify a bit and remove any impression to the contrary, my initial question was born only from curiosity and not meant as a criticism of any kind. My apologies if a wrong intention was conveyed. And as a side note, Churchill was indeed offered a peerage (Duke of London) but declined the honor because of the effect that such acceptance would have had on his son and subsequent first-born sons down the line, and who, like Churchill, may have sought a career in politics and a seat in the Commons. No member of the peerage can hold seats in both Houses (Lords and Commons) and first-born sons of peers do not have a legal right to refuse the title, thus requiring their resignation from the Commons when their father died and passed them the title.

The recent changes in titles and levels, from Knight, Lord, Peer, et al, to the new structure of Rising Star, Grand Master, etc., also apparently changed the point system regarding responses. In the old system, I had a score of 1200+, but am now at a level of just under 800. Doesn't really matter much since I can't use either to buy Scotch, but I'm curious as to why the difference. Anyone else notice a difference, or able to offer an insight?

My mistake, but when I read the thread title, my first thought was, "That's an awful name for a provider to pick!"

Isn't it odd -or not; I'm bring ironic- that ads that mention it at all state, "rates are for time only." Not the Big Lie we hear so much about these days, but, it seems, a lie just the same. Once is an occurrence, twice a coincidence, three times and+ a pattern. Live and learn, and be clear about expectations up front. If needed later, reinforce with consequence by offering to pay for metered service, and for that only. Be forewarned, it will likely not be pretty.

Today, maybe. But someday you'll be a Wide Receiver.

Pipefitting.

These eyes just so softly say to me ... "and do it now, bitch!" What a gorgeous face! I'm in love. Again.

No, I'm from Meat with Feet. It's like Meals on Wheels, but for a more targeted market.

I wish I had the Wesson Oil concession for this shin-dig. And the job of applying the oil.

In order: Alain Delon No. 2 ? [Later ID'd as Anita Ekberg]* Brigitte Bardot Angie Dickinson Elizabeth Taylor Jessica Lange No. 7 ? [Later ID'd as Claudia Cardinale]* Ava Gardner Vivien Leigh Olivia Hussey Deborah Kerr Hedy Lamar Ursula Andress Jane Russell Sophia Loren Tippi Hedron *Thanks to Whitman (see posts below)

I'd adopt him. And the dog, too.

I'm happy, sad, embarrassed, or fill-in-the-blank, that I knew all of them except for No. 2 (after Alain Delon) and No. 7 (after Jessica Lange and before Ava Gardner). Can anyone put names to those two faces?

It looks like you could have this kid for lunch money.

This brought a tear to my eye. I hoped his life turned out well and was able to feel love and freedom after serving in prison for such an absurd "crime" as to be himself in a way that caused no harm to another living thing.

Thank you for the clarification.

"...company rates potential sales workers on their looks and offers existing workers more opportunities if managers rate them higher on a scale of hotness." And the waitresses at Hooters have big tits. So what? It's part of the brand and no brand is to everyone's taste. Hooters certainly isn't to mine, but I don't long to see them all die. Why isn't it enough to not shop or patronize a place or business if one doesn't like it, but rather also feel one must seek to destroy it because you find it not to your liking. These are manifestations of a cancel culture mentality where you are welcome only if you unreservedly and completely embrace my views and values. We no longer even pretend to be tolerant of differences and seek only to make the world safe -not for diversity- but for a conformity of own creation, made in own image and likeness.

Interesting reaction; I began to salivate. Is the model named Pavlov?

Thank you. It works.

Ah! I see this Bentley is a stick.

I think the "unavailable" refers to his log-in status, not his availability for meet-ups. Please correct if I'm wrong. I do wonder why so enticing a young man would select Bristol for a home base. Maybe a unique employment opportunity or a family obligation, and the escort gig is a sideline or added revenue steam. Nice looking young man. (BTW, Bristol to Roanoke is 130+miles, one way! Best wishes with that.)

I just pray the bottom is naked and on his knees with hands cuffed behind him, thinking "Oh god, it's going to be a long night." I'm sorry. Am I projecting?

And to think, someone once called my Nehru jacket "gay." OK, maybe it was a little gay, but this?

I read somewhere that a man tried this but mistook a shredder for the copier. It wasn't pretty. Or any longer.

Haven't met him, but Woof! Hope he's for real and wish him well. Nice hair, great muscles, handsome boy-next-door type, and no tats or piercings in sight. What planet does he come from?

A young man (straight) that I dated for several years was one of the best and most passionate kissers I've ever known. He had beautiful, soft, plump lips and told me this earned him the nickname Lips when he was in school. It fit him.