Jump to content

CuriousByNature

Members
  • Posts

    3,444
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CuriousByNature

  1. Hi... but I don't recall ever meeting you.
  2. Sorry to hear that you felt the need to block so many people. Were they rude in PMs, or was it their responses to public posts? For what it's worth, sometimes I've found that directness may come across as rudeness in writing, when that may not have been the intention.
  3. Too late. One was already directed by Ernst LUBitsch.
  4. It's unfortunate there is no face picture.
  5. True, there is no Nobel Prize for this. But there may be a Pull-it-sir.
  6. As has been mentioned many times by many people in many posts, the health status in an advertisement can be inaccurate, out of date, or both. Please do not rely on what an advertisement says as being 100% truth - even the advertiser may not be completely aware of their current health status. Only you can take the appropriate precautions in protecting your own health and mitigating the risk of infection, and not just regarding HIV, but also for many other conditions and diseases that are sexually transmitted and not protected against by PrEP.
  7. If only everyone was as magnanimous as you, and had the same desire to sacrifice themselves for the betterment of humanity. 😉
  8. Skinless and boneless filet, on oiled aluminum foil. Mix mayonaise with a spoon or two of prepared pesto sauce, slather it on the filet and bake in preheated 450F oven for 10 minutes. Or for less time if the fish is less than an inch thick. If the filet is quite thin at the tail end, fold it under until thickness is more uniform, then cover with mayo. For variation, instead of pesto: Mix in sundried tomatoes packed in oil, with some italian seasoning, or A bit of curry paste, or Chopped capers and black olives, or Any other combo you like. If you want more of a crust, use the broiler and cook for 7 minutes instead of 10.
  9. If I recall, he also posts on the forum and is very well-spoken (or written I suppose).
  10. And it was the 40th anniversary of Karen Carpenter's untimely death less than a week ago.
  11. If he's 6'7" I wonder if he provides a ladder to get onto the table...
  12. That sounds way too complicated and troublesome to be worth any length of massage.
  13. But I'm not even a daddy yet... just wait until then and see how bad the jokes become!
  14. The legendary composer passed away at home yesterday at the age of 94. It is being reported that he died of natural causes. RIP
  15. Not sure if he's in LA, but this guy has a cute one.
  16. If he is only 83lbs then he must be about 4 feet tall...lol
  17. In 'general' that is a generalization. But for the sake of argument, here is my younger cousin. He's 47.
  18. Rentmen height is now 6'5". But he explains in the text portion that he is really 5'8" and if you add in his 'extra inches' he becomes 6'5". Clever guy!
  19. Pronounced the same way, so no need to be concerned that you may have said it wrong
  20. I think it's reassuring to know that providers have a way of sharing info and warning each other about potential threats. Hopefully that increases safety overall - it cannot be easy or without risk to base one's livelihood on meeting strangers privately.
  21. Some parts are getting rain, but it's staying mainly in the plain.
  22. I'm not sure that personality comes across accurately on camera, whether that is in porn or mainstream media. Actors act - and not always well - but it is more a persona than a personality that you are seeing until you get to know someone. Kindness is a huge plus in my estimation, because that is really hard to fake. I would be more interested in a genuinely kind woman or man who may not have amazing physical attributes, compared with someone with a supermodel's face and body that happens to lack empathy and grace. As for me, I have not heard the term 'butters' before, but I imagine that is what I must be since I never eat margarine.
  23. I get what you're saying, and I don't want to overly dissect things, but I still find it hard to see how his reply to you was objectively a dismissal. I can totally understand that it subjectively felt like a dismissal, but the average person reading the text would not likely come to that conclusion based on what he wrote. He even thanked you for the offer. Some could argue that you dismissed him by not replying to his text, until 12 hours later. True, he did not ask any follow up questions, but there is no reason to if he only wishes to consider professional photographers. I imagine that he thought the conversation was over once he told you he was not interested in being photographed and you did not respond with any other interest in meeting. I have never met with anyone, so I don't know what an interaction like this is supposed to look like, and I'm sorry you have been rushed and scammed by others in the past. It makes a person understandably wary, and in some cases we can become extra sensitive to how a message is given to us. Maybe this is part of the situation? I am nobody to judge or guess what goes on in another person's mind, but it is incredibly difficult to view text messages objectively if we have been hurt or disappointed in the past - it is too easy to read a tone into them that may not have been intended. Or the guy is a jerk - but I can't come to that conclusion on an objective basis. This is part of the issue with social media and virtual relationships - too much depends on our assumptions of one another, and not enough is based on real life connections.
×
×
  • Create New...