SirBillybob

If it’s actually ‘public’, not ‘pubic’, then I’m SlirBillybob or SirBillyblob, either of which could conceivably track.

I only freak out when I see the monthly statement for accommodating my fantasies. I have one of these …

Hunhh?

1. W’zapp 2. IDK 3. IDK … need a noon hour nap

With a carefully chosen deployment of emoticons you can make anybody like or not like you according to your whim, irrespective of positions on a topic. This only substantiates their artificiality and calls into question whether my own application of such reactions is honourable or disingenuous.

Sure there are. Only so many on a rosary. But Hail Marys are narcissistic when in fact I may use such a moniker to describe my own demeanour.

Haha, the old who blinks first stalemate. But she also asked select strangers if a piece of shit on their ring finger should be referred to as a diamond. 😏

I think that one explanation for physical appearance putdowns by anonymous posters whose own physical representation is understandably redacted due to a board’s agenda is that it might be the only location where they can present ambiguity about their own appearance. It may be a misdirected way to self-soothe their own harsh critical appraisal of self-perceived deficiencies. They can automatically decouple the societal tendency to conflate overall person value with physical characteristics particularly in the context of disagreement. I’ve had a few experiences of chatroom posters asserting major deficits in my physical appearance. Upon crossing paths on a chance basis I was absolutely floored. Otherwise, in a neutral context I would simply view them as average joes. They essentially instructed me, predisposed me, to be harshly judgemental.

… including at Greasepaints’R’Us and also goes for pearl necklace window-shopping at Tiffany’s. Of pores it’s up to the hirer to settle on payment.

YMMV. There are few things more subjective than justifiability. Interesting topic and piece, subject of course to critical appraisal, with I would think application to drop-down options as well, though I don’t think a ‘like’ response signifying read receipt in many instances would be deemed to represent any particular component of Big Five or Dark Triad. The Dark Side of Emojis | Psychology Today Canada WWW.PSYCHOLOGYTODAY.COM A communication strategy centered around self-promotion.

If any platform wants and hopes to subdue ‘mean girl’ dynamics then it should eliminate the paradoxical bind introduced by the tempting option of discretionary but totally unnecessary and lazily applied pejorative post response emoticons that naturally stimulate antipathy, while admonishing members to maintain civility. Lock up the loaded gun with a safe code. Don’t just leave it sitting on the counter with the safety on and implore all residents to abide by ‘hands off’. This goes for my own inner bitch. —— Similarly, don’t maintain derogatory emoticon categories, layering on the additional paradoxical bind of deciding about appropriately sought donations for site maintenance when the likelihood of essentially paying to be at times targeted for abuse arises and it’s not a stretch to assume a relation between obnoxious employment of such emoticons and non$ contribution. I’m not inclined to findom but I do want to financially support, however modestly, an activity that meaningfully fills a portion of my leisure time.

That of restiprocity.

The sacrament of Confession? Be patient. They are usually eventually ordained and you may enter the private cubicle. No Gawd is Glory hole but a sliding screen.

Kallis tabairnak, as we say sacrilegiously up here in La Belle Province, that’s funny.

Also introduces, added to the monetary paradox of keeping it up, the paradox of keeping it up.

Not so basic would be an upsell for the alliteration. 😏

Want to simply enjoy & pay for doing ‘the reverse cowboy'? Busted.

‘cept the occasional G-string … (I’ll let myself out.)

On the one hand, in Canada we have Montreal metro uniformed police dropping in to, say, Campus on their bar venue beats a few steps away from the private MSM dance area where paid for erections and orgasms abound. Appropriately live and let live. On the other hand, non-pimp 3rd party vehicle drivers of female sex workers to their appointments arrested and convicted for participating in what is ostensibly an added safety mechanism for the women’s occupational hazards.

Erm, talking? … jerking, then following an emphatic order to seek a professional seamstress among other commanded household tasks.

Yet why would one emphasize top tier platform recognition in relation to suppositions about health status? There is no categorical tracking of health status accuracy that would contribute to a grade of worthiness … or lost qualification points … for such an honorific. I’m not sure what the criteria are for this pageant-grade practice but I think it’s shallow enough that any sign of shifting sands regarding what dropdown menu health status item is ticked off across time does not figure prominently.

Good point. Yet why would one expect a propensity for health status distortion to be different according to commercial sex worker status compared to non-escort categories of sexual partners? Any type of endgame influences transparency in a similar fashion.

Just ReMarking, do I correctly perceive a Dalton all up in there?

That’s just.

I’m not a fan of regular douching and it’s compromising aspects in terms of natural rectal PH balance. In many cases there’s no correlation between faecal residue and having douched or not. Unfortunately my GI system does not alert me to when the GE self-cleaning oven type phenomenon kicks in and I do like a good wash in the rosebud area. I find that with these smaller soap bars and a bit of warming up they can be molded appropriately to really get up in there. TMI?