Vegas_Millennial

Hunqz on Romeo

And in some cases, reservoir capacity remains unused as rain and snowmelt must be released to the ocean anyway for environmental habitat concerns.

I agree. I was merely responding to the fears of others who mentioned California's growing population will exasperate California's water conditions

From Airplane! ✈️ Captain Clarence Oveur: "What is it, Doctor? What's going on?" [an epidemic of food poisoning is sweeping the plane] Dr. Rumack: "I'm not sure. I haven't seen anything like this since the Anita Bryant concert.”

Considering that southern California gets much of its water from northern California via the California Aquaduct, it is very appropriate to consider the total state population numbers. More demand on the water system in the northern part of the state affects the southern part, and vice versa.

If Los Angeles does grow, the solution lies in recycling its sewage directly back into the water supply. Nearby Ventura, California, has already started indirect sewage recycling by injecting treated sewage into the ground about 1 mile up-steam in the aquifer above its wells. In Ventura, they found the treated sewage effluent to be cleaner than the naturally occurring groundwater anyway, because of the decades of groundwater pollution from agriculture. Unfortunately, some firefighter unions resist using recycled wastewater. In Nevada, the firefighters unions got a law passed that prohibit cities from using recycled wastewater for fire hydrants. Because fire hydrants use the exact same water infrastructure as homes and businesses, that means no recycled wastewater for anybody, lest a city pay to install and maintain 2 sets of pipes in every street and 2 separate reservoir systems. The water is clean enough to drink, but not clean enough to spray on fires! 🔥 (Sarcasm)

It looks like the solution has begun, with California's population stagnant or dropping.

THIS is the best strategy I've heard yet! And, to be sure to follow ALL the paths of the semen, take an alcohol enema as well! 🎉

Would using an encrypted message application have stopped either of these cases? As you say in the 2nd case, it was a dispute between the provider and the client. One of the two parties brought the messages to law enforcement, so an encrypted messaging app would have been pointless.

Athens. It checks all 4 of your boxes.

🎉 At least one of you got your cardio in! Sounds like you worked him hard

So... Using an encrypted app wouldn't have prevented this. The undercover officer who who messaged via Grindr would have had access to the same conversation history even if the officer and the gentlemen had met on Grindr then subsequently communicated by encoded apps to each other. If you're communicating directly with undercover law enforcement, no amount of "privacy" settings are going to help you. Police arrest nine queer men in Grindr sex sting operation WWW.THEPINKNEWS.COM Georgia police have been accused of "cataclysmic failure" by activists after cops arrested... Quote from article: "According to authorities, seargent Dereck Johnson – under the user name “Charlie [looking for] 420” – initiated the conversation and offered to host at Dawsonville Quality Inn and Suites." It had nothing to do with authorities accessing a private conversation from the app company. The cop was one of the men in the conversation, so he was already privy to the entire conversation. Therefore, @Oakman's challenge still stands.

I just called him "Sir" 😉 despite him being younger than myself. It was the title that made the most sense given the positions we were in.

Sex in a steam room is very hot 🔥 indeed. The only thing hotter 🔥 would be sex in a sauna 🥵

Reminds me of this line from the motion picture "Life with Father": Do you mean to tell me that a pack of idle minded females pay $1 apiece to hear another female gavel about the events of the day!?

But I'm not going to disclose it via the Internet or social media. I will do it in person. Then we can discuss the status of my chicken pox vaccine or flu shot or arthritis medication or polio or coronavirus vaccine , etc., and you can choose to believe me or not. Interestingly, if a women tells a man she's on the pill but lies, the guy still has to pay child support if she gets pregnant. SHOULD she have told the truth, yes. But SHOULD the guy have worn a condom regardless of her answer? Absolutely. In a similar vein: Ask the provider about his status. But then put on that condom anyway and/or take your own medications for your own protection, REGARDLESS of the answer he provides.

Exactly! If an escort or client is involved with a sting by law enforcement, then the undercover officer who has been messaging the client or escort directly will have access to the messages using whatever method they chose, encrypted or not. I have an escort friend whose text message trail saved him in a lawsuit. The client tried to claim rape after a massage session, but the escort provided the text messages which showed the client specifically asked for sex before and after the session.

I met men from a variety of European countries. Some I even meet two weeks later at the sauna in Zurich (separate discussion thread), but it shows that the same boys travel a good deal.

I think I recall hiring that same Moroccan, multiple times 😁

When I visited Sauna Thermas in September, I hired men of African and European ancestry.

In my experience, I have not found any interior decorators available for hire on RentMen

You were correct the first time. "Who" is the subject. "Whom" is the object. "Who" did the telling; and, "Whom" was told. You could have also said: "I'm not sure it matters who is told by whom" or "I'm not sure it matters by whom who is told". At least you did not use a preposition to end the sentence. That is nonsense by whom up with which who shall not put.

Dollywood in Pigeon Forge, TN is fun. Although there are no escorts for hire, there's lots of horny dads frustrated from a week's holiday with their kiddos. A hungry cocksucker can enjoy a smorgasbord of Daddy dick while dad steps away from the hotel room to make a grocery run.

26% of employees have a company-provided mobile phone according to this study. Even more have company-provided landline telephones. Global Blog | New Motorola Study Reveals Employees’ Growing Desire for Work Smartphones, for a Better Work-Life Balance and Productivity Boost MOTOROLANEWS.COM Motorola's official global blog site for announcements, press materials and original stories about our technology. At my work, executive/appointment employees are provided company-owned mobile phones. When our IT department started requiring 2-factor identification to log in to work computers, they were surprised to learn how many hundreds of employees refused to use their personal mobile telephone for work, and the IT department had to come up with an alternate method to log in that did not require the use of personal mobile telephones. Similarly, some utility companies in my area started requiring the use of mobile telephone apps to upload plans to them, but they had to re-think their process when employees at other companies and governments refused to use their personal mobile telephone to download a work related app. My employer doesn't even have my mobile telephone number. Owning a mobile telephone is not a condition in my contract, so as far as they know I only have a land line. Problem solved: I never have to worry about an employer seeing my text messages.