Aaron_Bauder

@youngboldone, find an escort you like, book a time, go and see him and let him pound you into oblivion (or vice versa). Stop beating about the bush. Once you've been there once, refine your approach. I have met several well regarded escorts who are on here and didn't discuss things in excruciating detail. Guess what, it worked each time.

In your desire to have a perfect experience, the expectations you communicate may overwhelm the escort. You're not marrying him. You are spending a few hundred dollars for an hour or two of his time.

Wow, for a moment I thought it was "man-baby" Trump talking. Talk about infantile behavior... If you close your eyes and just listen, you would think some spoiled Brat was talking. All that was missing from this rant was "Nah Nah Nah" !!!!
 
And this is probably the exact behavior his clients are reacting to when they dump his ass ? So why does Mocha continue to be surprised at "clients" behavior ? They dont have the problem,
HE DOES !

Are disclaimers a guarantee you're all clear? Obviously not. But giving your potential future defense attorney at least something to work with by refusing to directly promise sex acts in exchange for money is better than freely giving a prosectuor all he needs to convict.
 
Good defense attorneys have gotten guilty parties off on legalese, wording, and semantics. Words, letters, and the letter of the law actually do matter in court. A good defense attorney will not let insinsuation and suggestion alone be enough to convince 12 people beyond resonable doubt you broke laws. Disclaimer or no, if the prosecution has foolproof evidence you've engaged in illegal acts, you will likely be convicted. So why provide such evidence to them freely?
 
This risk comes with the territory, hence why clients should think twice balking what escorts charge. This is risky business, not a free for all. And all escorts should have a legal defense emergency fund, just in case.

Are disclaimers a guarantee you're all clear? Obviously not. But giving your potential future defense attorney at least something to work with by refusing to directly promise sex acts in exchange for money is better than freely giving a prosectuor all he needs to convict.
 
Good defense attorneys have gotten guilty parties off on legalese, wording, and semantics. Words, letters, and the letter of the law actually do matter in court. A good defense attorney will not let insinsuation and suggestion alone be enough to convince 12 people beyond resonable doubt you broke laws. Disclaimer or no, if the prosecution has foolproof evidence you've engaged in illegal acts, you will likely be convicted. So why provide such evidence to them freely?
 
This risk comes with the territory, hence why clients should think twice balking what escorts charge. This is risky business, not a free for all. And all escorts should have a legal defense emergency fund, just in case.

Are disclaimers a guarantee you're all clear? Obviously not. But giving your potential future defense attorney at least something to work with by refusing to directly promise sex acts in exchange for money is better than freely giving a prosectuor all he needs to convict.
 
Good defense attorneys have gotten guilty parties off on legalese, wording, and semantics. Words, letters, and the letter of the law actually do matter in court. A good defense attorney will not let insinsuation and suggestion alone be enough to convince 12 people beyond resonable doubt you broke laws. Disclaimer or no, if the prosecution has foolproof evidence you've engaged in illegal acts, you will likely be convicted. So why provide such evidence to them freely?
 
This risk comes with the territory, hence why clients should think twice balking what escorts charge. This is risky business, not a free for all. And all escorts should have a legal defense emergency fund, just in case.

Mocha
As charming as I find your adorable attempts at putting articulate sentences together ...(and they are adorable) I had to stop reading your comment after the second paragraph. I'm not sure why you think it takes days to get to Miami ...it takes five hours...so...I'll stop there because ....suddenly I'm reminded of a George Carlin quote...he says "never argue with an idiot, they will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience".
That said, I sincerely hope u have a busy week so you can be happier. Happy Holidays from me...the "sell out" ;-) - Xo

I imagine they would insist for in-person if the escort is their type, but insist that Skype is good enough if he isn’t.

http://66.media.tumblr.com/02da95bc614b499e07527f6c3f4e64b3/tumblr_oatrkqrbIT1rpzv9jo1_500.gif

If I was texting a stranger I'd never met, and they started calling be by a name which I had not given them, I would be momentarily/temporarily taken aback. And I don't just mean regarding escorting. Until anyone gives me their name, it seems quite socially awkward to just start dropping their name as if we've met before no matter how I know it.
 
For example, a lot of us young gay guys have a very big social media footprint. I've hooked up with guys who are pretty well-known through social media, Instagram-fame et cetera. Obviously, they know that information is out there: they're psuedo-public figures. However, I've never ever let them know that I know any more about them than they've decided to disclose to me one-on-one, unless I've noted "Oh yeah, I've actually followed you on Instagram for years." To just start dropping knowledge about them ("How was your trip to Europe you took last month? Your cousin's wedding in Napa looked really fun. Is your best friend Kyle single?") without disclaimer or prompting in our very first conversation ever? Awkard, and doubly so if the conversation is not face-to-face.
 
If someone is using an alias and hasn't given a name yet, that's probably not a random choice. Escorting is, after all, still illegal -- however unjust and ridiculous it is. So I assume everyone involved, client or escort, wants a level of privacy about that which they have not disclosed until trust is built and otherwise noted, or until specific disclosures are asked for.

If I was texting a stranger I'd never met, and they started calling be by a name which I had not given them, I would be momentarily/temporarily taken aback. And I don't just mean regarding escorting. Until anyone gives me their name, it seems quite socially awkward to just start dropping their name as if we've met before no matter how I know it.
 
For example, a lot of us young gay guys have a very big social media footprint. I've hooked up with guys who are pretty well-known through social media, Instagram-fame et cetera. Obviously, they know that information is out there: they're psuedo-public figures. However, I've never ever let them know that I know any more about them than they've decided to disclose to me one-on-one, unless I've noted "Oh yeah, I've actually followed you on Instagram for years." To just start dropping knowledge about them ("How was your trip to Europe you took last month? Your cousin's wedding in Napa looked really fun. Is your best friend Kyle single?") without disclaimer or prompting in our very first conversation ever? Awkard, and doubly so if the conversation is not face-to-face.
 
If someone is using an alias and hasn't given a name yet, that's probably not a random choice. Escorting is, after all, still illegal -- however unjust and ridiculous it is. So I assume everyone involved, client or escort, wants a level of privacy about that which they have not disclosed until trust is built and otherwise noted, or until specific disclosures are asked for.

If I was texting a stranger I'd never met, and they started calling be by a name which I had not given them, I would be momentarily/temporarily taken aback. And I don't just mean regarding escorting. Until anyone gives me their name, it seems quite socially awkward to just start dropping their name as if we've met before no matter how I know it.
 
For example, a lot of us young gay guys have a very big social media footprint. I've hooked up with guys who are pretty well-known through social media, Instagram-fame et cetera. Obviously, they know that information is out there: they're psuedo-public figures. However, I've never ever let them know that I know any more about them than they've decided to disclose to me one-on-one, unless I've noted "Oh yeah, I've actually followed you on Instagram for years." To just start dropping knowledge about them ("How was your trip to Europe you took last month? Your cousin's wedding in Napa looked really fun. Is your best friend Kyle single?") without disclaimer or prompting in our very first conversation ever? Awkard, and doubly so if the conversation is not face-to-face.
 
If someone is using an alias and hasn't given a name yet, that's probably not a random choice. Escorting is, after all, still illegal -- however unjust and ridiculous it is. So I assume everyone involved, client or escort, wants a level of privacy about that which they have not disclosed until trust is built and otherwise noted, or until specific disclosures are asked for.

If I was texting a stranger I'd never met, and they started calling be by a name which I had not given them, I would be momentarily/temporarily taken aback. And I don't just mean regarding escorting. Until anyone gives me their name, it seems quite socially awkward to just start dropping their name as if we've met before no matter how I know it.
 
For example, a lot of us young gay guys have a very big social media footprint. I've hooked up with guys who are pretty well-known through social media, Instagram-fame et cetera. Obviously, they know that information is out there: they're psuedo-public figures. However, I've never ever let them know that I know any more about them than they've decided to disclose to me one-on-one, unless I've noted "Oh yeah, I've actually followed you on Instagram for years." To just start dropping knowledge about them ("How was your trip to Europe you took last month? Your cousin's wedding in Napa looked really fun. Is your best friend Kyle single?") without disclaimer or prompting in our very first conversation ever? Awkard, and doubly so if the conversation is not face-to-face.
 
If someone is using an alias and hasn't given a name yet, that's probably not a random choice. Escorting is, after all, still illegal -- however unjust and ridiculous it is. So I assume everyone involved, client or escort, wants a level of privacy about that which they have not disclosed until trust is built and otherwise noted, or until specific disclosures are asked for.

If I was texting a stranger I'd never met, and they started calling be by a name which I had not given them, I would be momentarily/temporarily taken aback. And I don't just mean regarding escorting. Until anyone gives me their name, it seems quite socially awkward to just start dropping their name as if we've met before no matter how I know it.
 
For example, a lot of us young gay guys have a very big social media footprint. I've hooked up with guys who are pretty well-known through social media, Instagram-fame et cetera. Obviously, they know that information is out there: they're psuedo-public figures. However, I've never ever let them know that I know any more about them than they've decided to disclose to me one-on-one, unless I've noted "Oh yeah, I've actually followed you on Instagram for years." To just start dropping knowledge about them ("How was your trip to Europe you took last month? Your cousin's wedding in Napa looked really fun. Is your best friend Kyle single?") without disclaimer or prompting in our very first conversation ever? Awkard, and doubly so if the conversation is not face-to-face.
 
If someone is using an alias and hasn't given a name yet, that's probably not a random choice. Escorting is, after all, still illegal -- however unjust and ridiculous it is. So I assume everyone involved, client or escort, wants a level of privacy about that which they have not disclosed until trust is built and otherwise noted, or until specific disclosures are asked for.

If I was texting a stranger I'd never met, and they started calling be by a name which I had not given them, I would be momentarily/temporarily taken aback. And I don't just mean regarding escorting. Until anyone gives me their name, it seems quite socially awkward to just start dropping their name as if we've met before no matter how I know it.
 
For example, a lot of us young gay guys have a very big social media footprint. I've hooked up with guys who are pretty well-known through social media, Instagram-fame et cetera. Obviously, they know that information is out there: they're psuedo-public figures. However, I've never ever let them know that I know any more about them than they've decided to disclose to me one-on-one, unless I've noted "Oh yeah, I've actually followed you on Instagram for years." To just start dropping knowledge about them ("How was your trip to Europe you took last month? Your cousin's wedding in Napa looked really fun. Is your best friend Kyle single?") without disclaimer or prompting in our very first conversation ever? Awkard, and doubly so if the conversation is not face-to-face.
 
If someone is using an alias and hasn't given a name yet, that's probably not a random choice. Escorting is, after all, still illegal -- however unjust and ridiculous it is. So I assume everyone involved, client or escort, wants a level of privacy about that which they have not disclosed until trust is built and otherwise noted, or until specific disclosures are asked for.

I understand where you're coming from, but you yourself opened this can of worms. You came here and solicited for opinions... And you got them. Because you didn't get the response you wanted doesn't mean some of them are wrong
 
All said, you've been here long enough to know this is how things function around these parts. Opinions spiral into megathreads and it turns into That's Entertainment I, II and III.