pubic_assistance

I completely understand your point. I also disagree with your perspective. Your viewpoint extraordinarily narrow.

A very good point. He's still wearing those same leather chaps from the 90s too.

And WHO is it who gets to decide what the "right thing" is ?

Maybe in your social circles, but I hear a LOT of disgust with the media push for transgender visibility in a variety of social circles that aren't gay-centric. Even some of my gay friends say it's too much/ too fast/ too far.

Some of the most "intellectual" people I've met are the most clueless when it comes to social issues. You can be under-educated and worldly, and you can be highly educated and reclusive. Not everything is learned in a book.

I could suck on those juicy nipples for hours.

This is true. However half the time it's the people who THINK they're intelligent who have no common sense and the "dumb" (under-educated) who see through the bullshit faster. So although I agree there is a growing anti-intellectualism in this country, I think that's a reaction to the stupidity spit out frequently by naive pseudo-intellectual-social-science theorists, who think they can change the nature of humans overnight.

Neither do I.

What political comments ? 🤔 Are you referring to this conversation @Lucky ?

Been discussed before. Nice looking/ great butt. Has a sliding scale $ 300 to $ 500 depending on your stats.

Some of these are comically bad. The head is so far off scale from the body that it's ridiculous to think someone is going to be dumb enough to buy into this scam.

Wow 😳 Did you seriously just write that and hit the send button ? Nothing high class about that statement either.

Looks like Julian's been hitting the gym.

🤣🤣🤣

Obviously. That's my point. Some people suffer less because their issue is private. A friend once pointed out to me that I could hide my homosexual tendencies but he couldn't hide his black skin. So to compare gay rights to black rights was ( in his opinion ) like comparing Venus to Jupiter Same goes for trans people. It's an uphill battle that is separate from the gay rights movement.

Handing the problem to someone and making it THEIR problem doesn't "solve the problem". Squatting only temporarily gets people off the streets.

Correct. But as much as the gays want to deny the existence of bisexuals we are here and lead different lives..and enjoy a greater degree of anonymity so our "battles" are different. A dude in a dress has a whole lotta people who ain't gonna be kind to him. There's no private life to live.

Bisexuals ARE more accepted. Usually because we blend into mainstream society better. I know very few bisexual men or women who you can tell their sexuality from casually meeting them. ( Not saying I know everyone or my sample group represents everyone ). Just saying that if I DO take a sample group from my life. The bisexual men and women I've known over the last 30 years, don't struggle the same sort of bigotry as a man in a dress because our issues dwell in our private lives and arent typically public knowledge. (Yes I know there there are some butch gays and feminine lesbians)

Such a beautiful man. Pity that body art gets in the way of God's own work.

Same for me. Very much "my type". He's good looking / great body...but not SO fabulous that I'd be running out the door to meet him. Standard Afro - Latin mix. Which IS often a sexy combination but I've seen better examples within the category and without comparing him to "white boys". I agree with @samhexum

Exactly. More for us who appreciate a manly man over twinks, twunks, trans and trends.

NYC buried it's homeless problem for decades so it APPEARED like it had improved through the early 2000s but like most cities it was a matter of sweeping the problem under the carpet. Discussing homelessness and the root causes of drug addiction and mental illness can not be guaged by casual observation walking around the streets of a city. And even putting a roof over their head (temporarily) doesn't solve the actual problem.

From the very start the issue is being misrepresented. "Homelessness" denotes and portrays the issue as a lack of housing for people. There is no lack of housing for poor people. There is plenty of housing sitting empty in many former industrial cities across, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and New York State. What is lacking in housing is a FREE place to crash in RICH districts. A favorite combination for drug dealers who live off the welfare check and make a substantial income from sales of party favors. Conversely, the rest of the so called "homeless" problem are mentally ill and the people who TAKE the drugs supplied by the other formerly "Homeless" drug dealers. You can provide housing for a mentally ill person and he will be back on the street within the year. They don't need housing, they need care. Serious care. All of that costs MONEY that nobody wants to spend. Most of the game played with your tax dollar is a matter of begging for $ 50M for this worthy cause. Then spending $ 10M, patting yourself on the back, for solving the problem. Under budgeting the maintenance and administrating costs and stealing the $ 40M balance and buying you and your cronies better houses for yourselves.

OMG what a tragedy I can't stand Marino. He's always a circus act. And lead by the spoiled brat son of the world richest man. Pure Kardashian glitz.