pubic_assistance

Those Catholics hate anyone having a good time ....😉

Jeremy is an example of how you can be sexy without being classified as Hollywood handsome. I would totally fuck.him. Even before the muscle gain back in his "Shameless" days

Best answer

Sad for me. We need more talent like you out here 😉

THANK YOU @Rod Hagen !! I find the whole attitude frighteningly clueless.

Same here. First dude I ever had sex with was 40/ I was 21. Now I'm in my 50s and 40 year olds aren't appealing to me in the least. Give me that 21 year old and I'm happy.

There are a number of churches in my neighborhood who run food banks. I've never seen the lines so long in all my nearly 30 years in NYC. Loads of perfectly "normal" people standing there waiting in the cold for a bag of groceries. Used to be a population of characters who obviously lived on the margins. Scruffy, jittering from their last bump of meth. Now you see your neighbors in line embarrassed that they have hit rock bottom and are living on the scraps of their paycheck

I used to find him very sexy, but al the cross dressing, and effeminate presentation has turned me off to him. This video is an impressive bit of art direction. I wouldn't call it beautiful nor do I find his music appealing. (Very little pop or rap today does appeal to me). But what is remarkable is the fellow's ability to stay relevant. Must be taking lessons from the Madonna Ciccone play book.

Exactly. This idea that they keep spinning in our dystopian propaganda feeds that we used to call "The News" try to fool people into believing that just because the RATE OF INFLATION is slowing, that prices are returning to "NORMAL". But "normal" means it's not moving up every month, not going back to what you paid in 2019. It's astounding how many people buy into this nonsense. Just look at your grocery bill or a restaurant check. In 2019 I could take my whole family out to dinner for $ 120, now my wife and I spend $ 120 just for the two of us without the kids. Literally DOUBLE what we used to spend. It's really out of control and no silly news report is going to make me feel good about it.

No Then may I ask why you felt the dubbing was "good" if you had nothing to compare it to ? I rather thought it was annoying that they dubbed it. I much prefer to listen to the actual actor's voice and inflections

Something about the guy. I've never seen a single photo where he looks bad. Doesn't need a "good side" or special lighting. Every random paparazzi shot looks like a modeling gig. Beautiful man.

Fair enough. You don't have to agree with one person. Who are YOU believing ?

Being born on a Latin Island doesn't necesaarily make you look "Latino". Cubanbd looks as white European as anyone. Lots of families in Latin America are desendants of the Spanish colonials and never intermarried with the indigenous people or with the African workers. "Latino" generally refers to a geographic and cultural background but doesn't mean your bloodline following the usual multi-ethnic typology.

Maybe you should READ what I wrote again. You seem to have missed the point I find lots of people are beautiful who aren't the definition of "classically handsome".

everyone who understands the math is warning of a rough year for the US economy. JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon Warns Inflation Could Be 'Stickier' and Rates Higher Than Markets Expect WWW.BARRONS.COM JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon is sounding a warning about inflation, saying it could be “stickier” and...

Did you compare it to the original ? I always find overdubbing to be clumsy...and since I am somewhat proficient in several languages I catch translations to be WAYYY off their mark in many, many films. I remember one of the worst was a scene in "Downfall" where a character actually said (in German) "I will always cherish the memory of our time together" and the translation was " I will remember our time together". Sucking out much of the romance and poetry of the moment in an important scene.

Always disappointing when someone leads with their photo from 2014.

Marriage as a concept is too often associated with love. You can fall in love and want to stay with that person without getting married. Marriage primarily means you want/need to share WEALTH. I married my wife because we started a family and NEEDED the legal protections of identity as a family where wealth is a consolidated entity not exposed to inheritance taxes in case of an unexpected death of one or the other of us. Does that sound like we forgot the romance? Well ..it probably does to some people. But my wife and I had several romantic relationships before we married...so we weren't blinded by all the fairytale feelings that many get lost in when they marry the wrong person. I married my best friend. I think too many people have unrealistic expectations of how marriage will guarantee their secure position to always be loved, cherished and valued without putting in the work to provide the same.

I wish more people were considerate like you. Too many people think that for the addition of some "happy time" during a $50 massage their "tip" of 50% is generous. Any experience that gives me a good orgasm means that I'm at the baseline of escort rates. So an $80 tip is my starting point, and other extras are calibrated to align with the cash in my wallet.

I usually find that providers who list "Swedish" as their primary modality are NOT skilled as therapists.

Your attempt to sympathise with pluralism in a conversation about "classic" beauty is interesting. It touches on the very problem with the understanding of "classically handsome" in this conversation. The idea is NOT pluralistic and multi-cultural and it doesn't try to be. This is likely why you're not finding many examples of it in multicultural places like NYC. Physical beauty and sexual attractiveness in multi-ethnic communities don't rely on the familiarity of a refined version of a single race. But the idealism of "classically handsome" DOES. So the concept is always borne of focus and therfore has no room for multiculturalism. All that said....I will use a single viewpoint from my own experiences of growing up in an all white, primarily Germanic community who's finer quality gentlemen were very much in the same category as the Hollywood Hunks of the 1920s to 1970s. MY environment surrounded me with many fine examples of classically handsome men who I did find to be beautiful. But once I left this monolithic society and moved first to LA and then to New York, my experiences of beauty changed and I am now more inclined to be attracted to people who look very different from me and therefore different from the Hollywood ideal. So this conversation keeps mixing up people's personal sexual triggers with the more narrow idea of "classically handsome" , which like the Greeks and Romans, is focused on one race and the refinement of one look. Today I would sooner go for Regé-Jean Page than Chris Hemsworth but I am well aware that Regé is an example of the new idea of multicultural beauty, and not eligible.for the narrow idea of "classically handsome" as Hemsworth may be viewed. The point is that what YOU PERSONALLY find to be most beautiful is not necessarily the same as someone who's interest is focused on "classical beauty".

Another example of how subjective physical beauty is. Clearly this gentleman hits some PERSONAL notes in what you find sexy. But is he Universally/classically good looking ? Most definitely not. Does absolutely NOTHING for me. But that's normal. It's very difficult to get 100 people to all agree on looks.

I assume you're being sarcastic ? 🤔 That's some seriously bad plastic surgery there.

I've been hiking back there. The biodiversity is pretty impressive considering it's in the middle of Queens and nearby to massive highway systems. You don't realize you're in the middle of the city.

Interesting.fellow. I wish him *bonne chance*