coriolis888

I hope not ! Somehow, he convinced rentmen to remove most of the terrible reviews his previous clients made about him. He also changed his ad name. This latest stunt causes me to rely on rentmen a lot less than I did before I saw the narratives and bad reviews removed with the new ad and the name change. Buyer beware. This is a bad guy. Also, one of the reviewers said that he is Spanish. He is Brazilian.

Uh, oh. His secret is out!

Above travel schedule is likely arranged by clients or just his wish list.

He is 33 around the waist!

" - - because these guys know we dont have another (legal) recourse if they just bail."

Greed causes that with lots of escorts

22 around the waist?

No one mentioned one issue with rentmen and texting and phone calls. To have a client's review accepted and printed in the provider's ad, if a client cannot "prove" that they "met" the provider, and by "proof" rentmen wants to see some communication on the rentmen site that the provider and client actually communicated with one another. For rentmen's reasons, a client's review will not be accepted by rentmen unless there is some communication on the rentmen site between the provider and the client. I recently had a conversation with a rentmen exec in Germany about another issue. The exec admitted that the communication requirement on rentmen is not "fool proof" that the provider and client met but there is another reason (too long to go into now) that makes rentmen require at least one "back and forth" chat on the rentmen site between the provider and client. So, unless you do not plan to write a review or if the provider does not care about reviews, rentmen communication is not important. If you or the provider want a review, at least start the communication with a rentmen chat of sorts. Then you can switch to text or another form of communication. I know for a fact that when a provider has a huge number of positive reviews, clients are more likely to hire the provider that has many positive reviews versus a provider with zero or only one or two reviews.

Res ipsa loquitur

Despite what you wrote above, too many providers still accept a client knowing they are tired or cannot perform well. Nonetheless, the provider expects money even though the provider is having a bad day and the provider knows that the meeting will likely end up disappointing for the client. Regardless, the provider accepts or demands full payment for rotten service received by the client. No question, escorting is not the same as buying a product from a store or reputable company. In many cases, escorting has gotten out of hand, pricewise and non delivery as agreed. Most providers now want payment up front because the provider knows he likely cannot deliver as agreed with the client. It is a shame that the rentmen reviews narratives are blocked to U.S. users. Reading the narratives tells you a lot about many providers that do not care whether the client is treated fairly. However, there is a way to read the rentmen narratives even though the narratives are usually blocked to U.S. readers. Reading the narratives is helpful as a guide to the likihood of compatibility. Several months ago I posted a link that will allow Americans to access rentmen narratives as though the clients' computer was in Europe. That way, the rentmen narratives are not blocked. Read the narratives on providers of interest. Sometimes you get a big surprise by reading the narrratives. To simplify accessing the rentmen narrative bypass, here is the link again: hide.me/en/proxy When the link opens, copy the providers' review page link in the space asked for in the hide.me link shown above. Happy reading.

Good days or bad days, the provider still expects to be paid. Not a pretty picture when you have to pay for nothing.

Rentmen declines reviews unless there is confirmation that you have communicated with the provider. Rentmen's way to prove communication is through rentmen chat. Many providers avoid chat because they plan to give lousy service and they know that a review will be declined if the chat function was not used. Therefore, initially, on first contact, use rentmen chat to and from the provider if you plan to write a review of your experience. Some providers (only a few, fortuneately) plan to give bad service or get your money without performing agreed services. In short, try to use the rentmen chat function. If the provider refuses to use rentmen chat, that should be a possible red flag if the provider specifically tells you not to use chat in any form. Texting is fine AFTER you first use the chat function to establish to rentmen that you communicated with the provider. Otherwise, the provider could get your money and not perform or worse. And, the provider would not have the deserved bad reviews show on his ad.

If he has been around that long and has at least four different ads with different names, how can his statement quoted below be true? "I am brand new and just created this." He might be a great provider but his wording credibility could use some fixing.

You are better off using a lap top or desk top. There is nothing to download except the link I provided. After the link opens, read where is says to add the site you want to open. The site is the reviews of the provider. Quite simple. Good luck but be careful if you hire this guy based on the negative reviews narratives.

Go to this website: https://hide.me/en/proxy Then, go to the reviews page for the provider. Copy the providers review page and paste it to the above link I provided above. You will then be able to read the narratives that are blocked to those using regular US computers. I think after you read the narratives of people who hired this provider you might want to look for someone else. Good luck

On 5/4/2023 at 6:30 PM, 12is12 said: _____________________________________________ I waited for two hours with about 80 people, 95% of which seemed 'immigrational suspicious'. [I'm a 65 y/o white, and showed them my outbound flight ticket. _______________________________________ I think it is clear that he did not expect to be exempt from scrutiny etc. I believe he said his age and ethnicity because the probablity of his being involved with something illegal or being an immigration violator is extremely unlikely. I do not see where he expected special treatment by stating his description.

Hi, thanks for translating that post.

Hi, you used abreviations in your post. That makes it difficult to understand your post or what you are asking. When you wrote "I've been single AF for most of my adulthood." Does that mean you have been serving in the United Stated Air Force? If so, your retirement will be made a lot easier than if you have worked for a private company. Again, if your mean Air Force when you wrote AF, you will not need to worry about medical expense if you retire from the Air Force. There are many other benefits for prior military veterans honorably discharged. Abreviations are sometimes nice but many times abreviation cause the meaning of a message to be lost. If AF mean Air Force, please confirm and I can let you know of a lot of benefits that are not advertised for former military who have been discharged honorably.

Yes, it is the same person. Compare the ears of each person - same Compare the face, eyes, hair line, eye color - all the same Compare the body statistics - same The reviews he got were good

If he can be difficult once, he can do it again to another person. Our time is valuable too. Please reconsider and name the individual.

I did not state that the provider was on-line as an underage. Again, please look at the title of the thread. This has to be a mistake about the age Add Tag

My thread has to do with a current error. Not errors of the past.

You are joking, I hope. I did not say " he was online as an underage." I merely implied that there is a clerical error in the ad that makes the provider appear to be in violation of the law because the error makes it appear that the provider joined the site at age 15. Title of this thread: "This has to be a mistake about the age"

Rentmen might not care but rentmen comes under the laws of Germany. Even though the ages stated are obviously not correct, the ad does state that the provider joined rentmen when he was age 15. Prostitution in Germany is illegal for anyone under age 18. The ad (shows the provider began advertising on rentmen at age 15 which could cause rentmen some problems with German authorities. As a gesture of goodwill, I will contact rentmen and let them know of the error that should be corrected.

https://www.advocate.com/people/roman-todd-ricky-larkin