coriolis888

Does he have a twin?

It is such a disservice for readers of rentmen in America not to be able to read the reviews written by clients about providers. However, with this link - https://www.hide.me/en/proxy you can go to the provider's reviews and copy the reviews link of his reviews then post that link into the place in my link, above, to read the reviews. If you can believe the reviews, he has some nice reviews but also some pretty rotten reviews over things he supposedly did to clients. The worst things he did were to collect money in advance and then have a client go to a room where there was some other guy there. Read the narratives in the reviews to see a pattern of behavior. The reviews tell you all you need to know about this character.

Either the provider pushes rentmen to take down the review by threatening to cancel their ad (many providers pay $700 monthly or more for an ad) on rentmen. Or, the provider threatens the client and demands that the negative review gets removed.

Yes, rentmen allows negative reviews from those who pay for their so-called "premium" membership. However, if a provider (who pays $1,000 or more per month to rentmen for advertising) contacts rentmen and wants the negative review removed, the negative review will disappear. Rentmen might be the biggest and best advertising source for hiring providers but rentmen has its faults for not being honest about reviews.

The provider must ask rentmen to remove the negative review. If the provider is a long-term paying customer, the negative review will disappear from their site.

Good for you for being grandfathered with the initial rentmen rate ($9.90) so you can write reviews on providers you hire from rentmen. As you know, new rentmen customers must now pay $240 annually for their reviews to be accepted by rentmen. Even though you pay only about $120 yearly for the right to have your review posted on a rentmen provider's advertisement (provided the review is not a negative review), what do you get from rentmen except being able to write reviews and see some minor porn that is free on many other internet sites? In short, rentmen clients who hire providers from rentmen ads cannot have a review accepted unless the client pays rentmen $240 annually. Unquestionably, this requirement is prejudicial and discriminatory, and potentially dangerous. It could be dangerous because rentmen customers who do not pay rentmen $240, but hire a provider from rentmen, cannot warn other rentmen customers about fake ads or dishonest acts of providers that are often reported on this site.

I did not say there were no negative reviews. I said that most negative reviews (reviews marked with less than five stars) are removed from a provider's account either shortly after the review is posted or within a few weeks.

So, the fact that you give rentmen $240 annually makes your reviews more credible than a review from someone who does not give rentmen money because they feel they are not getting any value for the money given to rentmen? Let's be realistic. Rentmen charges $240 from clients because the "premier" title is a profit center to rentmen. Think of the clients who are deprived of posting honest and truthful reviews merely because it is not worth $240 each year simply to review a paid experience with someone advertising on rentmen. Most of us know that rentmen deletes unfavorable reviews of their advertising customers. It is not in the interest of rentmen to expect a provider (escort) to pay rentmen more than $1,000 each year to advertise if the ad contains negative reviews. Hence, remove the negative review. Clearly, bonafide negative reviews being removed by rentmen is dishonest and not honest to clients who rely on rentmen as their source for finding providers. Rentmen is a great and necessary tool for finding providers but it is also a scam, without question for removing negative reviews.

Rising from the Ashes of Rentboy Comes a New Community for Male Sex Workers WWW.VICE.COM Five years after the government shut the male escort site down, a new partnership is attempting to recreate the safe space its predecessor was for so...

Very well said and accurate.

I thought your post was joking about Amazon selling Cade Maddox items. Go to the Amazon site (amazon.com). In the search portion at the top of the page, type in Cade Maddox - then click "enter" - I would bet any amount of money that Cade Maddox gets some sort of royalty on the sales of the items on the Cade Maddox page on Amazon. That being the case, the Amazon royalties would far exceed the amount Cade charges per hour for his services. What an interesting world we have.

One more thing - - - Of his 22 five-star reviews, five are from the same client and several others are from the same client. This means his reviews are misleading, to say the least.

I have the same feeling about RM purposely making the "new" RM version more difficult to maneuver. Likely the change/difficulty is motivated by a desire for more revenue/aka/making free clients become paying clients by making the site more difficult for non-premium clients.

The above address does not reach him.

His ad shows that he has only two reviews. One of those two reviews is a "one" star review. Can that few number of reviews plus the "one star" make an escort "established'? Established as what?

I used to hear from him at least monthly. Since the covid thing came along, I have not had any word from him. His phone number that I had is no longer in service.

Did RM give a reason for rejecting your review?

Just another vote for not paying for an encounter until afterward. So many times I heard this same type of scam by providers. On the other hand, there are good providers that do not scam a client. It is the "luck of the draw" when things work out well.

I just checked a provider's review through the service you mentioned (hide.me). It worked just fine. I could read the narratives.

Despite his less-than-good written English, his spoken English is quite good. I use to see him often in the saunas in Rio and with friends, but I have not seen him for more than five years. At that time, he still looked in good shape and he was close to age 40.

What a coincidence that you mentioned him. I met him more than ten years ago in Rio. He is quite bright and is a pleasant person. He is also very businesslike. His English is not bad despite what he says on his website. He comes to the U.S. fairly often and still advertises on rentmen even though he is rather successful in Brazil in matters unrelated to escorting. Every now and again I see his advertisement on rentmen for the NYC area. For being almost 45, he is in great shape, if the photos are reasonably current.

I have not met him. However, if you use a VPN to read the many reviews in his account, he seems to be real and has some nice things said about him. He has one negative review but it appeared to be from a disgruntled client. Only one bad review does not mean much compared to the other numerous five-star reviews. Based on his ad, he seems like a good provider. The only odd thing I find is that he is circumcised but also Brazilian. In my many years of traveling to Brazil and to the saunas there, I have encountered only one other Brazilian who was circumcised. Truly an unusual thing for a Brazilian. Read his VPN reviews, you might like him.

Too tough!

You are correct. Generally, an escort has an active "shelf life" of only a few years. There is no question that conventional inflation rates for services do not reflect service rates of escorts during the current increase in fees that went from around $250 (or less) a couple of years ago to $350 then $500 (or more) currently. Inflation rates for services of other professions did not come anyway near 100% as are many (not all) current escort fees.

Funny how we can get different answers depending on where we research. You cited the NY Times which has a good reputation. However, look at what the Macro Minutes says (also a good reputation) while discussing the different elements of inflation: For our first post in 2023, we pick up right where we left off: discussing inflation. The last news we received after the mid-December FOMC meeting came from November PCE inflation. Declines in goods prices helped bring down the overall inflation rate. Prices for goods decreased 0.4 percent, while prices for services rose 0.4 percent. On a year-over-year basis, goods inflation (6.1 percent) is still higher than services inflation (5.2 percent). With goods inflation and services inflation moving in opposite directions, which measure should we pay more attention to? Watching Services Inflation in 2023 WWW.RICHMONDFED.ORG For our first post in 2023, we pick up right where we left off: discussing inflation