coriolis888

Certainly unusual. Escorts/sex workers are great people but our bigoted society makes sex work unlawful. Considering your accomplishments, it seems you are taking a big risk in your side line work.

Reasonable people can disagree. However, which person in this dialogue is being reasonable?

Because it is "classless" and reminds the client that the visit is solely transactional. Who knows what to expect. You cannot logically compare paying a cashier for a legitmate transacation to paying an escort for something that has no recourse if thiings do not go right.

When you go to dinner together, does he expect you to pay the dinner PLUS another hour of his time for company? I had that stunt pulled on me in the past. I do not take escorts to dinner anymore.

It does? What is to prevent the escort from grabbing the money that is on the dresser and leaving after grabbing the money? It all depends on honesty and honesty is not very strong when it comes to escorts.

It is what it is. Escorts must at least pretend to find older clients and/or out of shape clients attractive during an intimate "get together" where money is involved. If the escort failed at that requirement, future hiring would be at risk for the escort in his profession. As to calling the escort his boyfriend, that is not so wrong considering there was intimate contact in the past between the two.

What kind of link is this?

You must look strong. Most escorts would start a fight if many of us tried something like that. I had a couple of instances where a provider suddenly pulled out a menu along with extra charges which I did not accept. I paid only the initial agreed amount. I think you did the right thing to the scoundrel.

Your business mind is working fine. There is no question that rentmen is trying to make more money by making it difficult or impossible to access a providers' "private" photos and the like that used to be standard viewing. Now, we must pay to view the majority of the "sensitive" photos of providers who advertise on rentmen. Rentmen got me to pay for being able to view the "censured" site. Prior to my paying, rentmen had recently changed its site to exclude private photos to "premium" members who paid the site. Prior to my paying, I could see only mild photos that would not be embarrassing to anyone, especially a provider. Money makes the world go around. If rentmen sells to another party or entity, rentmen, as we now know it, will continue.

refresh

What a white washed intrepretation of bareback anal sex!

There are three reviews now. Two are from the same person. Therefore, he has two conforming reviews.

You know nothing about me. You do not know my financial achievements or what I can afford. You also do not know why I will not pay an escort a rate that I think is excessive. I think the bitterness comes from you and your over priced escort advertisements that most people reject.

In the "era of prep", do you really think that all guys who engage in bareback anal sex unquestionably take prep according to directions faithfully?

You failed to acknowledge that the provider has a large photo in his ad showing bare back anal sex. That makes his ad misleading when his ad says "safe only". It is not logical for an ad to say "safe only" and then, in the same ad, to show active anal sex without a condom. Note: If you do not pay rentmen for a premium account, you will not see the large photos showing bareback sex.

If what you say is true, his ad is contradictory by saying "safe" and also including a photo of two guys having bareback anal sex. His ad is not for OF, it is for sex with anyone willing to pay his asking rate. If he does not do bareback with a client, why show a bareback photo in his ad? The bareback photo causes the ad to be misleading (untruthful) if bareback is not on the menu.

The ad shows that the provider is not truthful. In his ad, under "Safe/bb" he says "safe only" but in looking at his open photos of himself, he shows two naked guys, graphically having anal sex, without a condom. I do not think that hiring an untruthful guy at a high price is worth the risk. What else in his ad is untruthful?

Just curious, why would anyone want to pay for something that is legally free with the link I provided?

He would likely break your bed if you got in with him.

No one mentioned the fact that the escort will charge sales tax on the amount he charges you. That is wacko and an open door for the federal and states governments to tax his income plus the sales tax he collects from clients. However, it is a big leap if he will ever get any clients based on the wording and inconsistency of his ad.

McCloudy - Pornstar Performer, Rentboy, Gay Massage in Los Angeles, CA | RentMen RENTMEN.EU Pornstar Performer & Rentboy in Los Angeles, CA - McCloudy: Looking forward to meeting you The escort has only two photos in his ad. One of the photos seem to contradict the description of the escort. The escort ad says only a massage is given. Hours are from 6 pm to 11.pm. However, the ad shows that the escort is into general sex including heavy duty things (so much for only a massage.) The escort ad implies that he charges taxes for his service. That is something new and rather bizarre. Charging taxes for escort or massage services could cause the escort problems with the tax government if they saw his ad. His written description of himself says the guy weighs 340 pounds. Edit - he just changed his ad and now he says he weighs 360! Only massages. available Mon - Fri from 6pm to 11pm. full session of 40 min and can be extended for an extra fee. Taxes not included. Only for over 18 years. Cloudy days are better. For questions and estimates please contact by text or call.

I fully understand what you mean. I can afford those prices buy I hate paying them.

Send money to someone you do not know or ever met because it is their birthday! Talk about nerve or being nuts.

The Scheuble Hotel is only one block from Paragonya. It was remodeled a few years ago. It is not elegant but it is a nice hotel. Here is todays rate for the hotel, as an example: HOTEL SCHEUBLE $187 ($̶2̶7̶1̶) - Zurich Tripadvisor https://www.tripadvisor.com › ... › Zurich Hotels Now $187 (Was $̶2̶7̶1̶) on Tripadvisor: Hotel Scheuble, Zurich. See 219 traveler reviews, 221 candid photos, and great deals for Hotel Scheuble, ranked #71 of ... Rating: 4 · ‎ 219 reviews · ‎ Price range: $$ (Based on Average Nightly Rates for a Standard Room from our Partners)

htsrazil: Visa for Nationals of Australi, Canada and the United States Postpned April 1, 2024 Constant rumors about visa dates and delays and possible no visa at all. ________________________________________________________ Update April 1, 2024: According to news sources, the government is expected to again postpone the reinstatement of the visa requirement for nationals of Australia, Canada and the United States until April 10, 2025. An official decree is expected to be forthcoming in the next few days.