The idea that the NY Times is antisemitic is ludicrous. Many of their reporters are Jewish and they have a huge following among New York Jews. Granted, over time errors can be made, but again, over time, it's clear that the paper is fair to Jews.
WSJ and NYT both have new subscriber offers of $20 monthly for a year. The Times offer includes the Sunday print edition. The Journal offers all six days of print and digital.
If you want the real LUCKY experience, including the warm, wet feeling you get when intimate with Lucky, not to worry! It's now bottled for your personal use! Take advantage of this offer!
Available now on Amazon for $7.99! No profit to me! And remember- NO STICKY STUFF!
I think a low rate is often an indicator that it is a jack-off service only.
I would pay for a great massage, some friendliness, and a happy ending.*
*For example, we pray together on our knees. Separately.
I had let my NYT subscription lapse, but finally restarted and realized that I liked the layout better. The WaPo is also a bit more strident. They are the MSNBC of print, or so I think.
I know that @SundayZip is asking a specific question, but if anyone is interested there was another thread on newspapers in general:
https://m4m-forum.org/threads/does-anyone-here-pay-for-print-news-newspaper.160232/#post-1981840
In that thread I wrote that my sister and I liked the WaPo more than the NYT. However, I have changed my mind since then.
I saw another poster refer to a provider as a "specimen" today. I don't encourage use of that term to refer to human beings. Just my opinion, of course.
Strand sold out on the sweatshirt I tried to buy, so I am only getting a smaller item with their name on it. Glad they had such a good response, but I wanted that sweatshirt!
New Yorkers are so lucky...oops, I said that yesterday too! So many Asian masseurs, so little time. I like that this guy knows the importance of wearing a mask.