WmClarke

Just one year ago today, my dear friend and travel companion, Epigonos, left us on his 82nd birthday.  He was gruff and garrulous with strong opinions, always vocal about where he stood on an issue, but the sweetest man, in disguise.  He was generous, kind and sentimental, always protective of those he loved.
Was it just a year ago?
 
I miss him.

Yes, it’s possible.
 
I remained friends with my favorite escort for a few years after I stoped hiring. But during Covid he stopped responding to my texts so that friendship Is over.
 
Another escort has become a close friend. He got laid off of his day job right when Covid started. It was impossible to get a job then (“stay at home” orders, etc.). So I hired him one last time for a “G-rated” session where he made dinner and we just cuddled on the couch and watched a movie. This was about two years after I had last hired him. He had since moved to another town but we text a lot and see each other for a meal or at least drinks when one of us is n the other’s town.
 

A revision of Oklahoma’s prostitution laws earlier this year included the following 
 
from Free Speech Coalition

Wow. I would fee if it’s been tested in court.

What’s amazing about this movie is that it’s based on the real life events surrounding Alfred Packer, a prospector who are his crew and travel members in the search for gold in colorodo territory~ Trey Parker and Stone of South Park created this musical about Packer’s Life~ 

His response is that he's bored and that he posts here to amuse himself. 🙄
QED

The politicians are trying to protect themselves when they get busted.  

Praise be, at last. 
This will make all the difference for the thousands left homeless by tornadoes and floods every year. 

Being the 8th poorest state in the nation, one can easily think of some more fruitful activities for Oklahoma's legislators to engage in.

No Sooner said than dumb.

If I can write a fictionalized account of an evening with a sex worker, describing the appearance, attributes, attitudes, and appendages thereof, by what stretch of the imagination does the Oklahoma legislature conclude that I can't do the same to describe an actual encounter? Does no one in the Sooner State have a copy of the First Amendment? Or an adequate understanding of the same? 
This is the consequence to the only qualifications for public office being age and residency.

It is good to hear Oklahoma has nothing better to deal with than this nonsense.

A revision of Oklahoma’s prostitution laws earlier this year included the following 
 
from Free Speech Coalition

Wow. I would fee if it’s been tested in court.

For those who like to plan ahead – mark your calendars for Saturday (dinner), April 13 - Sunday (pool), April 14 and Monday (breakfast), April 15.  I hope to see many of you there.  And to those of you who have said “I’ll go next year” – it’s next year! 😄☺️👍

I think he is guilty of age-shaving in the ad.

Is he 78?

JoeBiden - Pornstar Performer, Rentboy, Gay Massage in Pensacola, FL | RentMen
RENTMEN.EU Pornstar Performer & Rentboy in Pensacola, FL - JoeBiden: Perfect Storm  

Well, you have to admit that he is "ripped."

I've started a new thread when one already exists for two main reasons:
1.  I have a bad memory
2. I'm not good at using the search function

Hopefully with all activity in one thread, it will be less likely to fall into that two year with zero activity.  However Admins can bypass the 2 year reply rule...  just likely an admin can reply in a locked topic, we can reply in a 2 year reply lock topic as well.  If we bump it, that two year counter is reset and anyone at that point can reply.  If it ends up being something we run into frequently following the launch of Master Threads, I can look at making that entire forum exempt from the check.  

I've had to start a new thread on a provider as well if an older thread on them has been locked due to the 2 year reply rule.

One of the biggest challenges that I've observed over the years is the number of "411" threads on a specific person.  There are times we could have anywhere from 3-12 on a single person!  This could happen for different reasons...  such as someone not knowing how to use the search function or the provider had changed their name.  
When we eventually launch the new review site, when a new item is added... a forum topic will automatically be created for that place/person.  It will have a subject of:
[ Category ] Item Name 
So for example, it might look like:
[ Escort ] John Doe
The first post inside of that topic will contain fields from the review (I can pick which fields get brought over so not all may be posted).  The goal will be that the topic will become the master topic about discussion about that item (person/place).  
Over time...  if we see information that changes about the item, people will be able to report it so that it can be updated.  So if an escort changes their name for example, someone would report that record and provide the new name.  A moderator will be able to update the item.  They'll also be able to add the old name to a special field called "Former Names".  This will let us to better track those who change their names from time to time.  
Inside the review record, it might look something like:

If other things change, that can be updated in the record itself.  
All of the detail from that record anytime it is edited would also sync to the master thread and edit the first post in it with the updated info, including the topic title if there was a a name change involved.  
Now... I'm going to put this out there now that moderators may from time to time not publish a name change in the "Former Names" field.  If we have reason to believe there is a risk to the person or there is another legitimate reason, we may update the name field only without adding the old name to the former name field.  
This will hopefully allow the first post to contain all of the latest known info about each item as it gets changed over time without needing to update 500 places.  If it works out the way I'm hoping, this will become the "source of truth" about the item and people can comment over time with their own observations, etc.  The topic itself would not be used for reviews.  (That's what the review system is for.) But general discussion about the person would happen there.
Eventually if someone does post a new thread about someone where a master topic exists, the moderators may end up merging that post into the master.
This is obviously not in place yet.  I'm just tossing the idea out there now so folks have a chance to comment on it and get used to the idea.  
 

My trainer says I should have 100 g of protein each day.
I found online sources that say an average load has 0.5 g of protein.
So I need to blow 200 guys a day. Line up, gentlemen! 
 
 
 

My trainer says I should have 100 g of protein each day.
I found online sources that say an average load has 0.5 g of protein.
So I need to blow 200 guys a day. Line up, gentlemen! 
 
 
 

Don’t do it. It is likely a scam. 

My trainer says I should have 100 g of protein each day.
I found online sources that say an average load has 0.5 g of protein.
So I need to blow 200 guys a day. Line up, gentlemen!