DWsoccer

What you are missing is that I did not hire him again. I happened to notice recently that he was advertising again with a different name and simply wanted to alert my fellow customers that this was the same guy.  I thought that was the purpose behind this forum - to keep consumers educated about the market. 

Is that ok with you? If not, then by all means please go ahead and hire him. 
 

He's using the pics of a fitness influencer from Instagram.  That is NOT who you will meet.  
FAKE PROFILE.

He's using the pics of a fitness influencer from Instagram.  That is NOT who you will meet.  
FAKE PROFILE.

He's using the pics of a fitness influencer from Instagram.  That is NOT who you will meet.  
FAKE PROFILE.

Yes, and the murderer is an illegal alien from Guatemala who was already deported once.  
 

What are your worst experiences with either providers or clients in 2024? Here’s mine.
Preface: Don’t laugh at me lol.😂 
I saw a new Latin provider in SF in June. He bottoms.
 
Instead of $350 (the rate he literally wrote to me and we agreed upon in RN chat) he demanded $400, claiming that was his rate. I told him he couldn’t engage in a service and then plan to charge a higher rate than the earlier agreed-upon rate. 
 
He then said ok and told me to stick my penis inside him again, because he “loved it”. Guys….. he then shat douche water all over me, on purpose. I should have known what he was up to when he was straining as if constipated. The poop was voluminous. He was laughing kind of maniacally too. I forced him out and blocked him on RM.
He’s changed his name so many times and seems to have deleted his RM profile. I don’t know if he’s still out there terrorizing clients with his diabolical butt.
 
Other worst experiences this year? With a client or provider.

Not "judgy" - factual.  You just say "judgy" because you give excuses for everyone to be a victim and seem to have little regard for personal accountability.
Re: Eric Gardner.  Yes, he should have taken measures to not be so overweight.  As well, he shouldn't have been engaged in illegal activities.  Did he deserve to die?  Absolutely not.  But he put himself in that position.

Mangione and Penny are two very disparate individuals.
Luigi Mangione is a coward; a cold blooded murderer.
Daniel Penny is a patriot and a hero. A patriot for stepping up and volunteering to serve in the military. We should never forget it is thanks to Daniel Penny, and those like him, that we enjoy the rights and freedoms that so many take for granted... but shouldn't! Penny served his country honorably to defend the rights and freedoms for every American, even for those  whose opinions we find to be vile and abhorrent.
Penny was a hero to EVERY person on that subway car. He is also a hero to millions of NYC subway riders who take mass transit every day, not because they want to, but because they have to. These are folks, by and large, who work hard, follow the law, and only want to get to their jobs and back home to their families safely. Neely was a drug addled, homeless degenerate. He was threatening every person on that train. His absence will not be missed. In fact, it should be applauded.
Good riddance to bad rubbish. 
BTC

That's exactly my point.  Daniel Penny didn't "get away with" anything, good looks or otherwise.  He had altruistic motives, not evil ones.  The more you make excuses for bad behavior and propagandize victimhood, the worse society becomes.  This is relevant to this discussion, because acknowledging Daniel Penny as attractive, if one does, is not a "criminal fetish" as it is with Luigi whatever his last name is.

I don't feel sorry for people who threaten other people's lives, nor will I sanctimoniously try to condemn those who sacrifice their well-being to keep others safe.  Luigi had evil malice.  That was absolutely not present at all in the other instance referenced.

Comparing apples to oranges here.  Unlike the CEO killer, this guy was protecting people's lives from a crazy societal degenerate who was threatening the lives of people on the metro.

You don't even realize you're doing it, then.   A perfect puppet.
Sad, but true.

Yes, you were making excuses for bad behavior.  He was mentally ill, he had a drug problem, he was homeless.........yes, these are all sad conditions, but none of them excuse his multitude of crimes against a number of people throughout his life.  EVERYONE has problems.  Some people address them, and others take the easy path.  Some are better equipped to deal with problems than others, but that doesn't mean it can't be done.
At no point did I ever "mock" the man who died on the subway, nor do I take pleasure in anyone's death, as you alleged.  I have no idea where you got that idea.  I simply pointed out the huge difference between the two people who were responsible for the victims' deaths.
I will never excuse people who put others in danger, regardless of their sob story or background.  There is never an excuse.

Not "judgy" - factual.  You just say "judgy" because you give excuses for everyone to be a victim and seem to have little regard for personal accountability.
Re: Eric Gardner.  Yes, he should have taken measures to not be so overweight.  As well, he shouldn't have been engaged in illegal activities.  Did he deserve to die?  Absolutely not.  But he put himself in that position.

Not "judgy" - factual.  You just say "judgy" because you give excuses for everyone to be a victim and seem to have little regard for personal accountability.
Re: Eric Gardner.  Yes, he should have taken measures to not be so overweight.  As well, he shouldn't have been engaged in illegal activities.  Did he deserve to die?  Absolutely not.  But he put himself in that position.

Yes, and the murderer is an illegal alien from Guatemala who was already deported once.  
 

You don't even realize you're doing it, then.   A perfect puppet.
Sad, but true.

That's exactly my point.  Daniel Penny didn't "get away with" anything, good looks or otherwise.  He had altruistic motives, not evil ones.  The more you make excuses for bad behavior and propagandize victimhood, the worse society becomes.  This is relevant to this discussion, because acknowledging Daniel Penny as attractive, if one does, is not a "criminal fetish" as it is with Luigi whatever his last name is.

Not "judgy" - factual.  You just say "judgy" because you give excuses for everyone to be a victim and seem to have little regard for personal accountability.
Re: Eric Gardner.  Yes, he should have taken measures to not be so overweight.  As well, he shouldn't have been engaged in illegal activities.  Did he deserve to die?  Absolutely not.  But he put himself in that position.

Yes, you were making excuses for bad behavior.  He was mentally ill, he had a drug problem, he was homeless.........yes, these are all sad conditions, but none of them excuse his multitude of crimes against a number of people throughout his life.  EVERYONE has problems.  Some people address them, and others take the easy path.  Some are better equipped to deal with problems than others, but that doesn't mean it can't be done.
At no point did I ever "mock" the man who died on the subway, nor do I take pleasure in anyone's death, as you alleged.  I have no idea where you got that idea.  I simply pointed out the huge difference between the two people who were responsible for the victims' deaths.
I will never excuse people who put others in danger, regardless of their sob story or background.  There is never an excuse.

Yes, you were making excuses for bad behavior.  He was mentally ill, he had a drug problem, he was homeless.........yes, these are all sad conditions, but none of them excuse his multitude of crimes against a number of people throughout his life.  EVERYONE has problems.  Some people address them, and others take the easy path.  Some are better equipped to deal with problems than others, but that doesn't mean it can't be done.
At no point did I ever "mock" the man who died on the subway, nor do I take pleasure in anyone's death, as you alleged.  I have no idea where you got that idea.  I simply pointed out the huge difference between the two people who were responsible for the victims' deaths.
I will never excuse people who put others in danger, regardless of their sob story or background.  There is never an excuse.

Yes, you were making excuses for bad behavior.  He was mentally ill, he had a drug problem, he was homeless.........yes, these are all sad conditions, but none of them excuse his multitude of crimes against a number of people throughout his life.  EVERYONE has problems.  Some people address them, and others take the easy path.  Some are better equipped to deal with problems than others, but that doesn't mean it can't be done.
At no point did I ever "mock" the man who died on the subway, nor do I take pleasure in anyone's death, as you alleged.  I have no idea where you got that idea.  I simply pointed out the huge difference between the two people who were responsible for the victims' deaths.
I will never excuse people who put others in danger, regardless of their sob story or background.  There is never an excuse.

Me making excuses for bad behavior? I've used the word "drug addict" multiple times in this forum, I've called HIV an easy preventable behavioral disease, but I will never mock a "degenerate" (as you called him) who was choked to death. 
I have a feeling there's some schadenfreude going on here and some folks really enjoy seeing a skinny homeless man. To some folks gay men like you and me are also "degenerate".  
You can have the last word, but can you please show some respect for folks suffering from mental health, homelessness, etc.
 

That's exactly my point.  Daniel Penny didn't "get away with" anything, good looks or otherwise.  He had altruistic motives, not evil ones.  The more you make excuses for bad behavior and propagandize victimhood, the worse society becomes.  This is relevant to this discussion, because acknowledging Daniel Penny as attractive, if one does, is not a "criminal fetish" as it is with Luigi whatever his last name is.

I don't feel sorry for people who threaten other people's lives, nor will I sanctimoniously try to condemn those who sacrifice their well-being to keep others safe.  Luigi had evil malice.  That was absolutely not present at all in the other instance referenced.