Rudynate

Now that you mention it, Chrome has gotten to be worse than Firefox. It's time for a completely new browser.

If you're only now realizing how bloated Firefox is, you must have a very high tolerance for slow clunky software. I haven't used Firefox in years.

I'm cut, but I look like I'm not cut.

I tried the versaclimber for the first time recently, very efficient way to burn off excess calories.

That part I can do without. I just need two stud men to be the spit.

Sounds like a great scene. I bet a good time was had by all. Getting spit-roasted is on my list.

What does that actually mean? That you reject a celebrity endorsement out-of-hand because it's a celebrity endorsement, or that you routinely ignore them, or that you are willing to consider them as possible sources of valuable information?

I've heard of putting an alka-setzer up somebody's butt and then giving them an enema. Never tried it.

Alcohol up the butt is supposed to be a very fast route of administration. Did he get really loaded?

Rubbing alcohol on a guys hole? Sounds awful.

I smoked a lot when I was young. Didn't touch it all for years and years. Started again as a means of coping with chronic pain. For a few years, I got high a few times a month. Recently, I've lost interest in it. Realized I prefer being clear-headed for the most part.

A friend of a friend died via assisted suicide recently. He was in his mid-80s, had end stage kidney disease and was facing going on dialysis.

If, in the spirit of being an independent thinker, you reflexively choose the viewpoint opposite a celebrity's, you are being as much of an automaton as you would be if you thought, "Well, if X thinks it, it must be so." You are allowing yourself to be used by your view of yourself as an independent thinker.

But you've still allowed the celebrity's viewpoint to determine yours.

I really like to tongue-fuck a guy. It works best if his hole is already stretched from fucking or fisting. When his hole is stretched, you can get your tongue way up there. Sends me into another world.

I like their explanation better - much sexier.

He may have loved her, but that isn't why he was doing these things she ordered him to do that appeared to be against his nature. His nature was to be submissive. Having sex with men at her insistence, even though he wasn't wired that way, was an act of deep submission, and I suspect the two of them found it extremely gratifying.

Why? He wasn't her victim. He was her slave, by his own choice.

Air quotes for sure. He could have walked away any time. I never doubted that the relationship was consensual.

Many years ago, I knew a straight married couple who lived BDSM all the time. She was the dom, he was the sub. They lived in leather and maintained their dom/sub dynamic all the time. He was an impossibly hot tall bearded biker type. She started making him have sex with other guys, but he was very resistant. I saw him alone in a bar once and was trying to chat him up. He was very uncomfortable, said his wife had ordered him to go in and pick somebody up. I would see them at parties. He wanted to hang on her, but she would order him to circulate and act like a man instead of being such a pussy.

At 65, of course I'm older than my hires, but sometimes not by much, since I love daddies. I hardly think about age. I just relate to everybody as a contemporary. I have a friend who is 85, and he feels like my contemporary. Some younger men relate to me as an older man, but most dont.

so he's into assplay

I was wondering if your mind hadn't skipped a track.