goosh69

Really? Seriously???

Yeah not allowed on this forum.

Why is this in the Deli section!!?!?!???!!?!?!?!?!!!!!???

I think he's been a regular poster over at Muscle Service.

I didn't say he was LYING...but less credible than a long time poster.

I will also say the guy who claimed he is a scam artist could ALSO be telling the truth. You know, he thought he was getting full service but just got worship and felt "scammed."

Member since today with one post total. So...super credible.

I don’t think you’re allowed to post social media of guys.

At the risk of being labeled a broken record and consigned to the forum's dustbin, I shall repeat myself on this topic with a few minor changes.

 

What do you define as "real straight guy" versus "straight identified?"

 

As I have posted multiple times, the research and science on this is in very early days because human sexuality and identity are incredibly complex and surprisingly flexible given a variety of environmental incentives. Research generally seems to see a distinction between Sexual Orientation and Sexual Behavior Orientation. There may even be a Romantic or Affection Orientation. It's dreadfully tricky to "reduce" an organic analog life into neatly discrete categories and labels. Klein--the brilliant bisexual sexologist--did some very interesting work to try and capture a better picture in his "Grid" that is more comprehensive than Kinsey's famous scale.

 

I could go on and on, but the fact remains that identification is a very personal thing and how a person self-identifies is their truth. Unless you're planning to use a penile plethysmograph to measure a man's penile blood flow as a proxy for his sexual arousal to determine what turns him on, then what's the point?

 

As a man with a strong attraction to stereotypically straight men, I am indeed turned on by the thought of sexual activity with a "straight guy" because of such cultural tropes as "the thrill of the hunt" or "obtaining the unobtainable." It's all fantasy, but for me, since my first formative same-sex activities were with guys who were straight, it strongly affixed this kink of mine.

 

What gets really "fun" and interesting about all of this is how it intersects this particular hobby. Understanding the physiological and psychological "limitations" of these labels results in certain realities. For example, a 100% straight-identified man--what Kinsey would've called a zero--would not have any sexual arousal at same-sex porn and might even be physically repulsed by it. Klein would argue that interests change over time as life experiences affect us. Consider "situational sexual behavior" like homosexual activity in prison or the military or even "gay 4 pay" activity.

 

Hmm. I've rambled all over the place. I return to my original question: what is your definition of "real straight guy?"

 

I've had the fun and hot experience three times in my life of being the first man to suck three different guys who identified as straight at the time and still identify as straight. They said I was their best and we enjoyed many hot times where I could worship them and they could enjoy hot head and go home to their girlfriends/wives. However, those types of activities are somewhat rare. Especially now because Millennials are far more open and experimental. I imagine it's becoming unusual to find a straight guy in his 20s who hasn't been blown by a male friend and probably blown that friend too. We live in a more open and less restrictive time.

 

In my hiring, when I seek a worship or top scenario, the guy I seek is classically and stereotypically masculine from an American cultural perspective, because that's my kink. Yes, I prefer "straight guys" but a truly 100% straight guy would be unable to top well because he wouldn't be able to get hard without medical assistance. That means, I seek out men who are able to perform with men or women. I like tattoos and body hair. Muscles and that classically "cocky" borderline arrogant/asshole attitude of a confident dominant man who knows what he wants and takes it.

You had me until you told anplain old lie about most millienial men having received blow jobs from other men. ALL of those studies you cite would say that while it’s more likely versus older generations, it’s FAR from a majority.

Since you "took one for the team," I do hope that you took the time to write a review that would encourage those of us who are interested to seek out the services of this hottie! :)

I might. It was pretty good, but my reviews have been rejected for whatever reasons in the past so I stopped doing them.

Haha. I posted links to soul and Wilhelmina which ARE top fashion agencies. And hat particular guy would just not be signed by either of them or any of the other agencies mentioned. But I also agree that looks are subjective. So there are LOTS of good looking guys to me or to others who’d ALSO not get signed for whatever reason.

This young man is not my type at all, but he is what I think of when I think of the "fashion model" type. Give me a fitness model any day!

 

https://rentmen.eu/LeoLaurent

That’s not a guy who’d ever be the type

Of model we’re talking about here. Or really any type.

NOT that any of these guys escort

- but THESE are what male models look like:

http://www.soulartistmanagement.com/models/gentlemen/all

Or

http://www.wilhelmina.com/new-york/models/direct/men

Certain agents and pimps do just that and relentlessly to get guys to strip and/or escort.

like TEN male models globally make enough to not have other jobs at any one time. They ALL need other sources of income besides those lucky few. Ergo... I’ve had fashion, fitness, and underwear models over the years. All non-porn stars. A reality show guy here and there too. It’s luck of the draw.

Well I dont know you so I really can't say. But if you hire escorts with violent criminal records with no regard to the crime you are really throwing caution to the wind.

I don’t hire such escorts. Stop saying things about ME.

You get off on the risk and danger factor. You may not realize it but you do.

I don’t.

Also don’t confuse “gay friendly “ with gay. They know how the bread is buttered and this HAVE to be chummy with and even have things paid for them by gay men all the time. Still does not mean they are gay or even, sadly for me, gay for pay. Generally.

They are mostly straight.

I’ve lived in NYC for a long time. And in LA before that. They are overwhelmingly straight. I know from

First hand experience. You can’t tell if they are gay from photos. Especially when maybe half the designers, stylists and photographers ARE either female or gay. You’re seeing male

Models presented through the lense of people who find them attractive.

Some do escort. The vast majority don’t make enough money to only model. I’ve stumbled upon some over the years through pimps and agencies and occasionally through their own ads. If you know very wealthy gay men in NY, LA, or MIA they might know people who know people. But 98/100 times you’ll be shit out of luck as far as them willing to escort.

Also they are mostly straight.

I took one for the team. The pictures on RM are accurate. He’s late 20s do COULD have been “Mike.” I don’t answer PMs so don’t bother asking more.

If he’s got fake pics, he strangely picked fake small dick pics.

Be careful that you aren’t sharing negative thoughts about an escort. I did and it turned out that the member was really the escort (using another name) who just wanted to see what I would share with members.

 

His retribution was a nightmare.

THIS^!!!!!

MANY personal train and will respond if you ask about that. MOST will be offended if you full fledged ask if they escort. Probably block you.

BUT - based on what a pimp er agent I know says, you will strike gold a handful of times out of a 100. At most.I take everything he says with a grain of salt so I'd bet less than 1%.

So fake we still think?

The aversion to body hair, in both sexes, does seem to be increasing. Some have claimed that the cosmetic removal of men's body hair, not only in the pubes but even on the arms, is a sign of the feminization of men by women who are uncomfortable with men's body hair as a symbol of brute masculine dominance.

Besides YOU, who actually said this?

No, it's just plain ridiculous in any form or fashion. It's like making a statement, that I'm not going to hire a guy that wears pink shirts. I know it's a free country, you can hire and not hire anyone you want to. But come on

No you’re ridiculous.

He’s an ex chippendale if he was ever one. They fire you for a public ad like this or porn or similar.