Wings246

Given the context, and knowing that all the participants are attractive/desirable people, the notion of "happy hour" is extremely alluring, to say the least. Are there happy events after the hour even though it's an "off duty" function? 🤤

The problem is: many people (on both sides) cannot host. We are stranded with no alternatives.

We all know the cost of living in SF is beyond ridiculous and $200,000/year in SF doesn’t REALLY buy you THAT much. That said, $200,000/year may be quite an ambitious goal. Is your $200,000/year estimate a before-tax or an after-tax value? If it’s after-tax, that roughly means you’ll have to make $300,000/year. That’s more or less an income of an executive level position (even in SF). Now, if you don’t plan on reporting anything to the IRS or the CA Franchise Tax Board, then it’s another story for another day.

So he's following the billable hour and travel time concepts adopted by lawyers and other licensed professionals. If that's the case, then I need to see the license as I will have to report to the official licensing board if and when the professional service is not rendered according to the professional standards. I have no qualms about how people run their own business, but people do need to use common sense and adhere to logic. I can't help but wonder who this person is.

If "object" is the perception, then it's understandable why you desire a unilateral experience. I need the interactions and reciprocations. It enhances the illusion of a BFE to the nth power. I lose my mind very quickly when I can sense (or see) that he is turned on by me.

Same day cancellations at the last minute? Due to the same reason? After you spent so much time on preparations? That's not JUST suspicious. I'd have blacklisted that person for good.

Maybe it's a rosary. The cross and the beads can provide plenty of stimulations. Holy Jesus and Mary indeed!

This may require too much backend programming for RM, but it would be nice if a section of "similar providers" will pop up on the bottom of the page after you click on a specific provider. This is similar to shopping on Amazon. There is a section of "customers usually buy these together" or "compare this with the following similar choices". Or simply: "clients who reviewed this provider had also reviewed these other providers". Then you won't have to waste time on endless filtering.

That is quite a strange and counterintuitive pricing structure at first glance. I always thought the difference between in-call and out-call rates is attributed to the travel time & commute/driving costs. That said, I also believe the one who is traveling has more control over the arrangement than the one who is waiting (easier to postpone and/or be late, easier to ditch and/or run away from shady situations, etc.). From a provider’s perspectives, it can be more advantageous to increase the financial barriers for in-calls. Not to mention the risk of inviting a psychopath into your own home and the stress of figuring out how to kick the psychopath out when things go south. Do you call the police? And if so, how do you explain the situation to the cops (if they even care to show up in the first place)?

Hiring is how I had my first-ever sexual experience. I lost my virginity to a provider. I am seriously considering coming out because of these experiences. I'm actively researching how to start dating (for the first time in my life). I'm looking for gay social groups to expand my horizon. I can keep going with this laundry list of changes, but you get the idea. None of these would have happened had I not sent that first text message to a provider.

I'm not sure if this is relevant to the topic, but a few months ago, I made this post: And that's how I read the RM reviews when I'm in the US.

Perhaps this experience could inspire a separate thread: "Questions for providers: how many regular clients do you have? How many regular clients would you like to have?"

Now, that's how you personalize customer services. In today's world, every company is dying to collect human data to expand businesses. It would be a waste to not collect & record the data that are literally right in front of your eyes and hands.

So it's more prevalent than I imagine. It could be: Two (or more) different people, whose pictures are stolen/borrowed/recycled/repurposed without the other's knowledge/permission AND / OR The same person using 2 (or more) RM profiles to Revamp a less-than-perfect review record Broaden his client pool by advertising based on different locations/personas/attributes I don't know if that's a smart business strategy though since most of the clients have eagle eyes.

Luckily, for me, my "worst" provider tardy record so far was only a 10-minute delay (due to downtown traffic accidents that I could verify on my GPS). So the limits of my tolerance have not yet been fully tested.

There is a fine line between lying/deceit and illusion/fantasy in this activity. I may not be too lucid when considering this, but I feel that the providers are compensated to deliver a believable lie to me. They are paid to pretend they enjoy my company. I subjugate myself to a gullible state of mind to play out a fantasy scenario where someone who is attractive and desirable somehow finds me attractive and desirable. In other words, I voluntarily engage in a game of deceit the very first moment I log on to RM. For this reason, I am not too bothered by this age shaving phenomenon.

I do believe you. That's my observation as well. The number of people on RM who lists their age as 29 is almost comical. I also believe that seeking youthfulness is the ultimate goal of a significant majority of the clients. However, I'm speaking for myself and myself only: I am a statistical outlier. I am not interested in that age group at all. Instead, I set my filter to 35+. And depending on my mood, I sometimes only zero in on those who are 40+. So in a weird plot twist, you'll be filtered out by me if you are 40 but age-shave to 29. Then again, I am fully cognizant that I belong to the super minority and I am probably NOT these providers' target audience anyway.

Same here. I was (still am) conditioned & brainwashed by my late father, who was neurotically punctual / early for every commitment. If I don't arrive AT LEAST 15 minutes prior to the agreed upon time, I'm considered late. Unfortunately, that's not how our current world operates. So, once in a very, very, very blue moon, if someone shows up early, I'll be thoroughly impressed and amused. Going back to the central question of this thread, a 30-minute tardy is a test of my tolerance; anything touching the 1-hour mark will induce a mental breakdown.

OMG, I didn't realize until now that this was a list of a week's worth of adventure. This is more jampacked than a full-time work schedule. I get exhausted just by reading it. Do you indulge in this kind of weeklong sexcapade frequently? 🥳

This is kind of cute and adorable.

I completely agree with you. I am not an advocate for false advertising or misbranding either. At the same time, I can care less about the reported age. I suspect some providers choose a much younger age only because certain clients screen potential hires by the RM age filter function. In my personal experiences (perhaps I'm just purely lucky), everyone I've met looks way better than their pictures and younger than their real ages. I don't even remember how many time I've told them that "you don't look your age." I keep telling them they need to hire a professional to somehow fix their profile pics to broaden their audiences.

Yes, I'm totally honest and upfront about my info (age, stats, descriptions, etc).

Hypothetical questions: Not that he's available, but if this famous Singaporean man, who is now 60, were to advertise himself as 30 (or maybe even 25), would you consider hiring him? Would you feel scammed or cheated when he reveals his real age to you after opening the door?

I suppose he turned 18 three years ago when you took him to The Happiest Place on Earth. Now that he's 21, you should bring him there again this summer to celebrate his college graduation! 🤣

Correct! Because these people believe they are patrons of Burger King -- "Have It Your Way," you know, with the self-ordering kiosk as soon as they walk in. Because when people are "hungry," they will need to eat NOW to satisfy the satiety signal.