This seems like an eternal debate and there is no correct answer; I’m just trying to rationalize both perspectives. I personally believe both sides are valid.
On one hand, it’s the principle of opportunity cost. It’s your time that’s being compensated, regardless of your expected labor output.
On the other hand, the value/intensity/complexity of your labor output should be considered. For instance, providers with dual roles of escorts and masseurs typically charge lower rates for massages than for bedroom activities. Applying the same logic, wouldn’t companionship be less labor intensive than actual sexual activities and be priced at a reduced rate?
Now, I can see some may argue that being emotionally and intelligently engaged in a companionship arrangement may be more exhausting than a hit-and-run quickie. Then, that will be another story……