Mark_fl

Absolutely 💯. There is critique of service which is fine. And critique of physique if does not match the pictures on the profile is also Absolutely above board. Outside of that, it is inappropriate. Some posters seriously need look deep inside your soul.....or perhaps buy a wall size mirror. Here I disagree. We aren't promising any physique or using it to make a living. Our appearance should have no bearing on our commentary. [You posted your comment inside the quotation box. Mods moved it out.]

There is also a difference between critiquing someone's fashion choices (including tattoos) and physical appearances one can't do anything about. Preferences aren't going to change, but we can still be kind. Also, we might be less critical if we thought the provider we're critiquing was going to see it and respond. After all, I hope we're all here to make this hobby/business more fun/profitable, rather than a bitchfest.

I think we all start with physical attributes, and if that passes the first test, we move on to their profile, will and won't do and other compatibility. And while I'm never going to hire SIMPLY on posts, after getting to know a little about providers here, I am much more likely to try and find time to see them should they be in my city. I find kindness and intelligence attractive. The providers that are afraid to come here because of criticism are likely the ones we should be avoiding anyway.

If this is true, you either hide it well or focus on the 1%. On these boards I once commented that I was happy to talk to providers to ensure them that I was real and give them a sense of comfort before meeting a stranger in a strange place (as I will not send a deposit) and you immediately interpreted that and accused me of just wanting free time and getting off on some phone sex. Neither is something I want, and I don't even ask for additional pictures. If that is your knee-jerk response, you can't convince me you have respect for potential clients. Maybe I'm wrong, you had a bad day, and will apologize, but I'm not holding my breath on that one.

That would be nonsense-ual.

No. It doesn't take time, and young people have nothing but time, if you look at the amount of time spent gaming and online. Not being afraid of being portrayed as a grumpy old man (I've been old since childhood), I can say what they don't have are the language skills to communicate intelligently. A generation of texting has removed that skill.

With the exception of the accusation of being a junkie (although even that as you wrote it) these are all opinions. I'm sure all providers realize that they have characteristics that will not appeal to everyone. You can add "too muscular", "too thin" "too tall" and anything else to the list. Are any of these comments necessary? Of course not. People can and should just move along if they don't like something (although I don't see anything wrong with a comment such as "he's georgious, but really hate tattoos). If a provider gets bent out of shape by this sort of opinions, he's probably in the wrong line of business. Its an obvious part of putting yourself out there for sale. And you know if you weren't attractive in general, you wouldn't be hired in the first place. So you're likely pretty hot.

What's also been nice is that you can more easily determine which providers respect the clients and which are condescending. 80% of the providers who post here are great. Sadly those who are anonymous are anonymous for a reason. If we knew who they were, we would stay far away.

This can work both ways. If you are looking for a real connection, knowing a person from the forum can enhance that. If your looking for an anonymous or dominant encounter, it can have an adverse effect.

Maybe this is more for the bi clients or male providers to chime in on, but personally, although I'm equally attracted to men and women, I wouldn't hire a female sex worker. Reasons being that I feel much more likely they are being forced into it, and also more likely there is a man managing or taking a cut. I could be way off base, but I just don't feel like if there was a similar site to RM for woman, I'd never really be taking to the woman pictured. Has anyone run across a similar issue with male escorts? Is there something we should be on the lookout for to see if someone is doing this against their will? Would it pay to ask, or would that be offensive? Interested to hear thoughts and opinions.

Frankly, I think few participate because there is more to lose than to gain. The ones who post here seem mostly intelligent and articulate. If you aren't, you can get eaten alive, and will come across as petty and defensive. Personally, I want to hear the providers 'side' of the story. It seems to me that on this forum, when a provider does so, the majority of clients seem to side with them. But again, if you aren't too bright, it will end badly for you.

I'm just going to give the poster the benefit of the doubt and assume this was just a delayed April fool's day joke.

I think a sensual massage in this case goes further than therapeutic, but not sex. Probably undraped and will massage erogenous zones in a seductive way. Based on the price, Probably includes HE, but I'd ask him the difference before hiring.

I think that's a generalization. I contacted a provider in NJ where I planned on being a couple of weeks later and wanted to have something set up. His communication was good, and he did ask me to video chat through WhatsApp almost immediately. I figured if I wanted him to hold a date for me two weeks out, he had the right to know I was real and had no problem doing it. We had a pretty good meet up as well.

Let us know. Im tempted myself.

I think your logic is sound. But maybe the approach. What is you offered the incall rate and offered to pay for the Uber? This way he's getting his full rate and you only have to pay for one trip. I get that it sounds like negotiating, but it seems like the upcharge for outcall is travel time and expense. Why pay for that twice? Maybe I'm just cheap too, but I'm an accountant, and the math works.

This "out" thing is puzzling to me. My sexuality is something I've never discussed in public, as is the case 90+% of the people I meet. Does that mean almost everyone is closeted regardless of orientation? I have always been a private person, and this was the case for the first 50 years of my life (when I was 100% straight). I don't think anyone needs to be in or out of anything. Share what you want with whom you want, and don't feel guilty or repressed about it. If you're happy, be happy, and don't let anyone convince you that you need to broadcast anything to anyone in order to be better or happier.

That's great! I never knew I had a name before. I feel so welcomed 😌!

Bump from an hour ago? am I missing something?

Sign me up for this! Im not interested in anal at all. But what I've found (not that it's surprising for masseurs) is that if they do oral, it's pretty reluctantly, so I think I'm going to try and tactfully see if it's part of their service. As a matter of fact, one offered it on my first visit, maybe to get me to return, and it clearly wasn't something he was going to do when I came back. When I texted him before considering a third visit, and very tastefully asked if it was something he was comfortable doing, and telling him either way I enjoyed his massage and wished him the best. He didn't even respond.

Just had my first with Tony. I can't imagine it will be my last. He's a beautiful man who looks just like his photos. I went for the VIP package. It was more of a rubdown than professional massage, but it was very nice. He did use some vibrating massages for a few minutes, and when he started again I told him I preferred touch. He immediately put it away. He made you feel welcome immediately and he was very friendly and appreciative.

Thankfully it hasn't been quite 3 long years.

Worst masseur experience was the second visit after a good experience. Seems the things he did to get me back weren't things he did always or willingly. Disappointing.

https://rentmasseur.com/Tonyxxxx

And now he is no longer available o. The RM platform. Does that mean he was booted? Doesn't seem good.