glennnnn

I’m the same,I had no interest for decades… decades! I then began seeing a young hot Brazilian guy. He introduced me to poppers (after decades of no interest) and in one session I asked to eat his ass. I didn’t use poppers that time and only superficially ate his butt, probably for less than a minute. But then after each subsequent session I did it again and finally got to the point where it’s almost all I want to do. I’ll still suck his fat cock and get fucked but my greatest enjoyment is doing poppers while he kneels over me doggy style, straddling my chest, sucking my cock, with his butt in my face. I love stretching his cheeks and getting my tongue in further.  He’s always clean but other guys can be hit and miss. It’s all about the face and the butt to me. The face needs to be cute and the butt clean, tight and a little hairy. 

Foreskin presence or absence under penis details, please.

Foreskin presence or absence under penis details, please.

Cut/uncut is rather graphic and vaguely judgemental. How about just yes or no? Further details can be included along with notes about the specific cock under review if needed.

Foreskin presence or absence under penis details, please.

Glad to hear it went well! When I went in 2021 I'll admit the hardest part was attending the first event where you don't know anyone! I still remember meeting Epigonos for the first time and he was very welcoming and gregarious. May he rest in peace. 
I hope to make it next year. I was going to go but had to cancel a month ago due to work.

One of the biggest challenges that I've observed over the years is the number of "411" threads on a specific person.  There are times we could have anywhere from 3-12 on a single person!  This could happen for different reasons...  such as someone not knowing how to use the search function or the provider had changed their name.  
When we eventually launch the new review site, when a new item is added... a forum topic will automatically be created for that place/person.  It will have a subject of:
[ Category ] Item Name 
So for example, it might look like:
[ Escort ] John Doe
The first post inside of that topic will contain fields from the review (I can pick which fields get brought over so not all may be posted).  The goal will be that the topic will become the master topic about discussion about that item (person/place).  
Over time...  if we see information that changes about the item, people will be able to report it so that it can be updated.  So if an escort changes their name for example, someone would report that record and provide the new name.  A moderator will be able to update the item.  They'll also be able to add the old name to a special field called "Former Names".  This will let us to better track those who change their names from time to time.  
Inside the review record, it might look something like:

If other things change, that can be updated in the record itself.  
All of the detail from that record anytime it is edited would also sync to the master thread and edit the first post in it with the updated info, including the topic title if there was a a name change involved.  
Now... I'm going to put this out there now that moderators may from time to time not publish a name change in the "Former Names" field.  If we have reason to believe there is a risk to the person or there is another legitimate reason, we may update the name field only without adding the old name to the former name field.  
This will hopefully allow the first post to contain all of the latest known info about each item as it gets changed over time without needing to update 500 places.  If it works out the way I'm hoping, this will become the "source of truth" about the item and people can comment over time with their own observations, etc.  The topic itself would not be used for reviews.  (That's what the review system is for.) But general discussion about the person would happen there.
Eventually if someone does post a new thread about someone where a master topic exists, the moderators may end up merging that post into the master.
This is obviously not in place yet.  I'm just tossing the idea out there now so folks have a chance to comment on it and get used to the idea.  
 

Foreskin presence or absence under penis details, please.

Foreskin presence or absence under penis details, please.

In PHASE 1, we won't be able to have explicit images in the item records.  This is because I don't have a way (YET) to flag them as NSFW or hide them from guests.  That's something I plan to add, but that would be post launch so I don't slow this down any further.  
Technically I could add them now, but they would violate the site rules of no explicit content in areas accessible to guests.  I already have it on my post launch list of stuff to come back to!

Cut/uncut is rather graphic and vaguely judgemental. How about just yes or no? Further details can be included along with notes about the specific cock under review if needed.

Perhaps consider how the review site will differenciate between a “massage” and “escort” experience.  I think it is fair to say more than a few of us would appreciate that distinction.

So there. 

How many names has this guy used up. There's enough plot twists here to fill a movie of the week! The lead could be played by Adam Sandler or some other would- be actor . LOL.

mmmmmm BIG

More like Mr.TooDamnBig!

OMG that is fucking hot

I'm 79, 5' 9", 160#, very active... Do I qualify?:

I'm 79, 5' 9", 160#, very active... Do I qualify?:

Was it a Disney production?

I'm 79, 5' 9", 160#, very active... Do I qualify?:

My most memorable companion, cited in a recent post, met me with a deep kiss as he opened the door and drew me into his apartment at the beginning of our first encounter.  I have never felt so welcome.

I've told this story before.  LONG ago a client I'd seen only down at his house in Laguna Nigel, once while the remodeling crew was on the other side of his home-office door!, was staying at the BH Peninsula. He was a nice and fun man , but also one of those guys who would often "joke" about not paying me unless I do this or that.   Our appointment was for 4:30am and I wore workout clothing so that if anyone asked why I was visiting that early (in my 20s I was very insecure about being in fancy hotels, I felt everyone knew I didn't belong) I was just going to say I was his trainer.  He had told me his room was off in a corner and he wanted me to knock on his door stripped entirely naked in the hallway.  I told him that was unlikely, but I would if I could.  As it turned out there were three other doors near his, and I could hear activity in at least one of them.  I took off my tanktop, knocked on his door, and I know from the peephole I looked naked.  He opened the door, VERY excited and then saw I wasn't naked.  BUT we got things going quickly, and I saw him a few more times. 

It wasn't a deflection. You seem to see disagreements to your belief, ON this subject specifically (I'm not generalizing about you broadly) as deflections or only half-the-story.
In answer to your question to me, Yes I would, absolutely.  In practice, however, I don't have money. Friends and strangers give me money so that I then at least have some.  Looking at other providers, for example, presumably Kevin does have money, and people give him money so that he has even more.  This is a nice gig AND when the feelings are there they are real wether you see it that way or not.  Either I'm lying or I'm not.  It's what you choose to believe.
Dude, I just spent every day of the last 6 weeks in the hospital (see other thread) with my Client/Friend, it's not like he's paying me to do that.