purplekow

I had a patient who was exceeding good looking and hung around the Hollywood scene in the fifties and 60s. He told some interesting stories about Marilyn Monroe as he was a good friend of hers near the end. He claimed to have been in her home the day she died and left at her request as she was expecting Bobby Kennedy. He returned to the house in the early morning hours and was meet by the maid who told him that she was dead. In any case, he had nothing good to say about Paul Newman. HE said that of all the Hollywood stars he had met and bedded, that Paul Newman was the most arrogant and least considerate. Still, I would have given an arrogant and inconsiderate young Newman a tumble had I had the opportunity.

He played Little League ion Eastchester NY, one of my homes in the past. They have his name on the field and his number 7 is hanging on the backstop

I saw him when he was in his clean cut body builder phase and he was great. I saw him again as he headed into his long haired kind of disheveled stage and he was less great but still fun. I see he got into porn a bit but then faded from view. Anyone with any insight?

Clearly you have an opinion which are now defending with circular reasoning: Your premise: People only died with Covid if they had a preexisting condition therefore if you died of Covid you had a preexisting condition. . A million people in the US died. About 10000 of them were under 50. If you chose to believe that every one of those 100000 who died had some vague underlying condition to justify which is reality is an unjustifiable position, continue. If you do not know you have a pre-existing condition and it is found on autopsy, then your decision to not take the vaccine as you did not have a pre-existing condition was incorrect but unknowable. By the way, The number of autopsies done during the height of the pandemic were minimal as most medical personel were busy trying to keep people alive. Autopsies in general have decreased in frequency for many reasons but to assert or imply that autopsies would have proven that those young people who died of Covid really had a previously unknown risk factor which became apparent post mortem has no bearing on their particular decision to have or not have the vaccine. But there is a precedent for uncovering underlying disease on autopsy. During the Viet Nam war autopsies done on battle field casualties revealed an astonishing high number of them had a degree of coronary artery disease, most men in their 20s many hard early CAD. Those people still died of the wounds inflicted and not from CAD. The healthy people under 50 who died from Covid, died from Covid. One day they were fine and a week later they were dead from Covid. Many of those that died did so after the vaccine was available and they chose not to take it. They lived with that decision and some of them died as a result of that decision. If anything your argument that only at risk young individuals died of Covid would suggest that since one can never be absolutely sure that one does not have a risk factor since there was this great uncovering of risky medical condition on the innumerable autopsies you suggest were done, that taking the vaccine to cover that possibility is probably prudent. That was the decision that you made for yourself. That indicates to mean that you at least think there may be some legitimacy to the vaccinations.

First, there were certainly young healthy people who died from Covid. About 10% of the deaths have been in people under 50. Some of those were at risk, but many were not. Unfortunately, I took care of many such patients and even many of those who survived had prolonged hospital stays and secondary effects such as myocarditis, Guillan Barre syndrome, renal failure, pulmonary embolism etc. Vaccinations have dramatically decreased the number of admissions to the hospital and were a first line prevention of many serious cases. They did not prevent disease necessarily. They. did limit the severity of disease and the cost to the health care system and the economy as a whole. The vaccine also allowed science to catch up and develop other treatments which limited disease severity and length of contagion. From my limited experience, caring for several hundred people with Covid, at the onset, there were the elderly and those at high risk being admitted who came severely ill and died during the first wave. The hospital in which I worked had about 150 beds which were designated for Covid patients, we now have 6. Eventually, there was a lull in the numbers of people being admitted to the hospital. That occurred at the time of vaccines, mask protocol and with the change in the weather which allowed people to more easily avoid significant contacts. With the second wave, the patients I cared for in the hospital were generally younger than during the first wave and almost exclusively unvaccinated. The death rate was lower, people went home sooner as better treatments were available and the news stopped reporting on the numbers of people dying 1 million in the US, though there still were and are people dying. I have no doubt that vaccinations saved lives and limited morbidity. That some people opt to continue to espouse that philosophy against vaccinations does not mean they are stupid, but it does, in my opinion, make them foolish in this decision. I feel about them, they way I feel about people who say they do not worry about the effects of tobacco because their grandmother is 91 and smokes two packs a day, and that is you take your chance and if you lose, you and the health care economy pay the price. I am glad you opted for the vaccine. I think you were generous in waiting for others who were at higher risk to have access to the limited supply of vaccines that was the case early on. You considered the pluses and minuses as you saw them and opted for the vaccine. I wish others had taken the same considerations and come to the same decision. I had several young healthy patients in particular, for whom making a different decision contributed to their dying much too young.

Well the fresh fish in Palm Springs may not be so good. But as long as you are not a heel to her, she will not be a sole soul.

Well in my imaginary trip to Antarctica with my imaginary benefactor/friend, I would naturally have invented the Iceberg Martini if it did not already exist. I have no conscious knowledge that I have ever heard of an Iceberg Martini but my mind has a way of grabbing useless information, so perhaps I had. I like my Iceberg Martini with a Titanic steak and then I crash.

Financial discrepancies in a friendship is not any different than any other inequality. Friends figure out how to make it work. My younger friends will bear with my lack of physical prowess. My thin friends will accommodate my latest weight loss plan when inviting me for dinner. I similarly will figure out a reasonable vegan meal though I am a carnivore for the most part. Monetary inequity does raise many issues, but as others have said here, honest conversation and a willingness to avoid having pride interfere as an issue, will allow most to work around this. If I had a friend willing to take me on a 14 day trip to Antarctica, I would gladly go, but the first round or Iceberg Martinis would be on me and I would be sure to have a meaningful gift, not necessarily expensive gift, for them after our return. Thanks do not need to be given in kind, but they do need to be given in kindness. As to those with so much money that they worry that their friends are using them, I say: Get the fuck over yourself. My life is plenty rich without your money and if you do not know your friends well enough to know that about them, perhaps you are not really their friend. I would also suggest to those who have exceptional financial means, do not pay for everything. If a friend offers to get a meal, let them. Do so without a word except thank you. R E S P E C T find out what is means to me

If a man is clothed, I like a round ass in tight pants. If the man is naked, well then any part can be a party.

At the local Costco here, you do not have to provide proof of membership to use the compressors.

60 years as a Met Fan can do that. At least I am not a Jet fan.

Great body but not much of a travel planner. Midwest, Europe, the South, Europe. Racking up the frequent flyer miles? Also no NYC for we horny men of the Big Apple.

I was speaking to a friend and fellow Met fan just before the the Atlanta series and both he and I agreed that we would probably not watch the series after watching almost every other game during the season. The inevitability of them being swept, even DeGrom and Scherzer cannot overcome the pact someone with the Mets made with the devil to win the 1986 World Series. It has been 36 years since then and starting in 1987 there have been inevitable collapses. Losing all four games in the Subway Series by one run, starting when a runner assumed a ball was a home run and it was not. Kemp homering off Gooden in the Dodger series. Matt Harvey convincing the manager to let him pitch the ninth in the series against Kansas City resulting in a game one loss. A KC rally which included a bad throw to the plate in the same series. The blown series against the Cardinals with the final out, Beltran, a strike out looking at a hanging curve ball . Losing at 7.5 game lead against the Phils in the last 17 games. The innumerable manager and GM hirings resulting in all sorts of embarrassing information coming out about the hire right after he signs the contract. Even last year, first place through August with a substantial lead and a fold to finish third. 60 years and you have the Miracle Mets of 1969 and the Bill Buckner Ball of 1986 and that is the extent of ;the legacy. So I will not be watching tomorrow and if by some change DeBrom does not get beat 2 to 1 on an error and a homer, I will not be watching Sunday.

When the Mets, as expected, did not win a single game in Atlanta, that was it. Sixty years of being a Met fan and I am not even bothering to watch the playoffs. I will wait for next year and see just what new agony they can inflict on their fans.

Met him Toronto a few years ago. He has a great body and was very nice. I am not sure if topping him or vice versa is an option as we did not go there. If you want to know more, PM me.

As a lifelong Met fan, their life not mine, I came to expect this. A rule change that forces the Mets to play a three game series with a good San Diego team, while the Braves sit and wait. Even if they win, the Mets get the Dodgers and the Braves get the Phils or the Cards. Anything can happen, but it seems a ridiculous way to decide such an important factor in the season. In addition, the Mets actually played a more difficult schedule than the Braves, playing the first place Yankees four times splitting 2 and 2, while the Braves played the last place Red Sox instead and went 3 and 1. With a balanced schedule next year, that will not happen, but it likely played a role this year.

I believe Mr. Coric has one of our former posters and more popular escorts as an employee and trainer. Perhaps, they will both come to see the benefits of an escorts life. Ah,,,,,only in my dreams I fear.

I had sex almost exclusively with women up until age 50. (Blow job in car from a guy who paid me to let him do me and a frot session with a friend in college when we were drunk. are the exceptions.). After my wife died, I found dating women and the expectations of a relationship was too emotionally taxing. I wanted sex, but was not ready for a relationship. So I tried female escorts. They were expensive, and not very convincing or satisfying as lovers. Accommodation rather than passion. So rather than just be celibate or have to work on a relationship, I went through a gay escort site. Initially I was hesitant so I went through a site in which there were about 400 thumbnail photos. Only three men held interest for me. Two of those were near enough to my location to try. So, as an experiment, I arranged to hire one. Turns out, getting blown by a man was just as rewarding as getting blown by a woman and there was no fuss, just muss. Over the almost 20 years I have been hiring men, I have expanded my activities. I occasionally have sex with women. Usually as a result of being set up by friends. At this point, I do not label myself, rather, I just enjoy sex with people with whom I want to have sex and who are willing to have sex with me. If anyone asks, which they have not, I would tell them I have sex when I can, with whom I can and then ask why they want to know.

He has gotten huge. Preferred him in his smaller sexier muscle days but for those liking bulk he certainly fills the bill.

Even not knowing for sure, I would have passed up on someone with all those posed, model like photos. Posing while Holding Champagne in a bathing suit, who does that in real life?

Certainly an interesting find. Wou8ld also like some info on him. I: love the picture accentuating his thighs, very sexy legs.

Eric Hussan is bright, friendly and sexy as all get out and one helluva nice guy. https://rent.men/thedudenextdoor

One night of passion with the heir to the Iron Throne and apparently many years of angst, guilt and celibacy after. They need this character to get freaky and this actor to go full frontal with an impressive Member of the King's Guard if this show is to be saved.

Game of Thrones had a characters that revelled in debauchery. The men were fit and aggressively sexual, while the women were conniving and unafraid to play sex games to control powerful men. In the original, when a character went to a brothel, there were extras actively fucking and asses and cocks on full display. In this version, the men are not nearly as sexually tempting. One of the two male characters who showed interest in other men was beaten to death a few scenes after he was introduced. The male character who has taken a pledge of celibacy gave up that pledge one episode or so after it was made known but has been angst ridden since, rather than the original's Jon Snow who was angst ridden about giving up his pledge until he did and afterwards cold not keep his sword in its sheath. And the behavior in the brothels is more child care like than adult dens of iniquity. I am still hoping Ser Criston, the previously mentioned angst ridden lapsed virgin and for me the one male character I find attractive, to have an orgy with all manner of male and female body parts writhing over his fit body. But he seems too earnest to do that. So I will continue to watch in hopes it gets better, but like the present occupant of the Iron Throne, I think for me, the show will be dead after one season.

I was at the Adonis Nude party three days ago. I had a great time and much better than the few other times I attended. I got to meet Coolwave and there were a few other Forum Members. in attendance. Who made the Party for me though was Bobby Biceps. He is a muscle bodied man who also has an engaging personality and a great smile. I did several privates with him and he was a feast for all the senses. Looked great. Smelled great with just a perfect combination of sweat, testosterone and unadulterated sex. Felt Great with smooth, large muscles and his trademark biceps hard and round. Tasted like honey and He sounded great with a bass growl when I found just the right spot on his neck, nipples or pits. There were several other very attractive and well hung dancers there. Tylor, Manuel I, Manuel 2, Mike Buffalari. But I found myself returning with Bobby to the private dance area again and again. I am definitely returning to next Adonis Nude Party and I hope Bobby is there again. In the meantime, we have plans for a private dance in the coming week. If you are partial to muscular guys who are fun, outgoing, down to earth and engaging, consider giving Bobby a call.