Reviews are Back!!!

[+ BenjaminNicholas]

Thanks Daddy for all that you do. Great seeing the site back into the swing of things. People already complaining can gladly start their own site, spend their own money on it and attempt to legally make a better mousetrap. It ain't easy.

 

Again...is review #60 REALLY going to be helpful when hiring???

 

So, you're saying that escorts who work hard, treat their clients right and garner 60, 70, 80, 100+ good reviews should be ignored?

 

No sir. That's called professional consistency and it's one of the toughest things in any business to have.

[+ RyanDean]

YAY DADDY.

[gallahadesquire]

Oh Frabjous Day! Calloo! Callay!

[+ sync]

[Epigonos]

Benjamin in my eyes, at least, there is a considerable difference between making a personal observation and complaining. My post was simply a personal observation. I totally understand that Daddy has every right, as the ringmaster of this circus, to run it anyway he wishes. I also understand that if I believe future reviews are of no use to me I DO NOT HAVE TO READ THEM OR WRITE ONES.

When I first started using this site nearly fifteen years ago the reviews were the only part of the site I was interesting in reading - frankly that's how I found you. Over the years the reviews have become less and less important to me and the various other forums have become my chief focus. As far as I'm concerned that transition, for me, is now complete. I can spend my time responding to treads on the different forums and ignore the reviews. I SPEAK ONLY FOR MYSELF AND CERTAINLY ACCEPT THE FACT THAT MANY POSTERS HERE WILL DISAGREE WITH ME AND I CERTAINLY RESPECT THEIR RIGHT TO DO SO.

[Epigonos]

Before I sign off on this tread I would like to make one additional observation. I would hope that future reviewers would spend a little time presenting a general description of themselves. I always found that the clients self description was as or even more helpful than the actual review. I was never terrible interested in reviews written by thirty something year old studs. It is a definite possibility that an escort might have responded very differently to the thirty year old client than to the a seventy year old client. Although I'm not large (overweight) there are clients here who are and they might also get a different response from an escort than the thirty year old stud.

I never found particularly helpful reviews in which the client simply described himself as "a newbie expanding my horizons". I always thought "a little more information please".

[bostonman]

So first of all, huge thanks to Daddy.

 

I'll be using this for sure. If my escort for tomorrow agrees, you should have a new one from me by the end of the day tomorrow.

 

Question though: I am reading review #5 https://www.daddysreviews.com/venue/usa/new_york/alexander_nyc

 

and I cannot figure out if any of the he doctoring has happened:

 

"We started with me trying to take his massive cock down my throat. "

 

Was that not the kind of things that would bring unwanted attention? Or is doctoring for some other things like identifiable locations? Or doctoring will be for later? I am just confused.

 

I can't answer for Daddy, so I won't really try to address the "doctoring" issue - but I will offer an opinion of my own. I tend to think that "play by play" (or, should I say "blow by blow"), while detailed, aren't all that helpful. Invariably they come off sounding like a porn story, and as such, wind up telling us more about the client than the escort. I certainly welcome knowing what activities took place in general, but what we of course want to know is what the escort's role in the appointment was, not how the client wants to romanticise it, lol.

 

In this case, the reviewer could have simply said "I wanted to try to deepthroat him, even though I thought it might not be possible given his size. But Alexander was a good fun coach, and he helped me get there. His eye contact and smiles made it extra hot. A fun experience."

 

(the original review says "We started with me trying to take his massive cock down my throat. I thought "no way is that possible" - but Alexander was a good fun coach, and we played around a while with it, and damned if I didn't have him balls deep after a while. It made my eyes water continuously, but it was hot and he was looking me in the eyes and smiling the whole time. Just a fun experience.")

 

Just as informative, I think - and puts the description on how the escort helped the client do what he wanted to do, not so much how the client behaved during it.

 

As far as what specific explicit language will be allowed or not allowed from here on, I don't know. But I think it's wise to be concise while still giving pertinent info, and to make sure we understand what made the escort's participation good (or not), instead of how and what the client did. We're not hiring the client, lol.

[+ José Soplanucas]

I can't answer for Daddy, so I won't really try to address the "doctoring" issue - but I will offer an opinion of my own. I tend to think that "play by play" (or, should I say "blow by blow"), while detailed, aren't all that helpful. Invariably they come off sounding like a porn story, and as such, wind up telling us more about the client than the escort. I certainly welcome knowing what activities took place in general, but what we of course want to know is what the escort's role in the appointment was, not how the client wants to romanticise it, lol.

 

In this case, the reviewer could have simply said "I wanted to try to deepthroat him, even though I thought it might not be possible given his size. But Alexander was a good fun coach, and he helped me get there. His eye contact and smiles made it extra hot. A fun experience."

 

(the original review says "We started with me trying to take his massive cock down my throat. I thought "no way is that possible" - but Alexander was a good fun coach, and we played around a while with it, and damned if I didn't have him balls deep after a while. It made my eyes water continuously, but it was hot and he was looking me in the eyes and smiling the whole time. Just a fun experience.")

 

Just as informative, I think - and puts the description on how the escort helped the client do what he wanted to do, not so much how the client behaved during it.

 

As far as what specific explicit language will be allowed or not allowed from here on, I don't know. But I think it's wise to be concise while still giving pertinent info, and to make sure we understand what made the escort's participation good (or not), instead of how and what the client did. We're not hiring the client, lol.

 

It is also useful to communicate clean information that is not in the ads like

• did he seem to enjoy his time with you?
  
• was he a good conversationist?
  
• was his demeanor warm and friendly?
  
• Does he look like his pictures?
  
• Was communicating and setting up the appointment easy?
  
• Did he arrive on time to your place/hotel room?
  
• Was his room/apartment clean and welcoming?
  

I am sure you all can figure it up many more.

[bostonman]

It is also communicate clean information that is not in the ads like

• did he seem to enjoy his time with you?
  
• was he a good conversationist?
  
• was his demeanor warm and friendly?
  
• Does he look like his pictures?
  
• Was communicating and setting up the appointment easy?
  
• Did he arrive on time to your place/hotel room?
  
• Was his room/apartment clean and welcoming?
  

I am sure you all can figure it up many more.

 

Oh, I absolutely agree. I was just focusing on the best ways to describe the physical side of the encounter, lol.

 

I would also say that a red flag might go up for me if there's only one review and it's one of those explicit "play by play" type things. Makes me wonder if it's a planted review designed to act like a supplement ad, instead of one submitted by a real client.

[+ OliverSaks]

So, you're saying that escorts who work hard, treat their clients right and garner 60, 70, 80, 100+ good reviews should be ignored?

 

No sir. That's called professional consistency and it's one of the toughest things in any business to have.

I just think he means that once you've gotten 60 reviews, does adding one more really mean a whole lot? The pattern/precedent has been set, and it is obvious that a companion is 1.) good

2.) willing to do things that the client wants to do

[mike carey]

My thoughts were along the lines of @OliverSaks' idea that the 60th doesn't trump the other 59. Moreover, if the 60th review were constrained in what it can say because of a new need for a conservative description of what happened, that should not detract from the detail that had been disclosed in the previous 59. I suspect reviewers will adapt to any new writing style and deliver meaningful reviews, even if that takes a little while. @Epigonos has expressed his concerns about the reviews, but I am more confident that they will continue to provide us with a useful description of what escorts can deliver.

[+ purplekow]

My thoughts were along the lines of @OliverSaks' idea that the 60th doesn't trump the other 59. Moreover, if the 60th review were constrained in what it can say because of a new need for a conservative description of what happened, that should not detract from the detail that had been disclosed in the previous 59. I suspect reviewers will adapt to any new writing style and deliver meaningful reviews, even if that takes a little while. @Epigonos has expressed his concerns about the reviews, but I am more confident that they will continue to provide us with a useful description of what escorts can deliver.

 

I just wrote my first review in the new system. I kept it PG though, and you may trust me on this, a two hour session with Eric Hassan is not a PG encounter. Still, I think it may be of benefit to some who want to see Eric. It was more challenging to write and much less fun then when you could use words like throbbing, explosive and ceiling staining without worrying about the sex police, but I guess that is the world in which we find ourselves.

[mike carey]

I just wrote my first review in the new system. I kept it PG though, and you may trust me on this, a two hour session with Eric Hassan is not a PG encounter. Still, I think it may be of benefit to some who want to see Eric. It was more challenging to write and much less fun then when you could use words like throbbing, explosive and ceiling staining without worrying about the sex police, but I guess that is the world in which we find ourselves.

I'm sure it will be of great use to men who want to meet Eric. I have chatted on line, exchanged texts, met him on a platonic level, and Eric is a wonderful man, and that relationship is wonderful. I hesitate to change it, but that is a decision for a later time. I look forward to reading what you say. I am confident that the reviews and the scope that this forum presents for public or private conversations will allow us to maintain a level of discussion of escorts that satisfies us all.

[Guy Fawkes]

https://daddysreviews.com/news for the front page.

 

in case anybody forgot....

https://daddysreviews.com/

seems like it was only yesterday.....

[mike carey]

Or go to the top left of the screen and click on 'Reviews'.

[Guy Fawkes]

Google Search: "site:daddysreviews.com xxx-xxx-xxxx"

How do you search reviews by number?

 

If you can't please provide a link, mate.

[Guy Fawkes]

Send Suggestions to Daddy. He's the keeper of the master list of bugsfeatures. [email protected]

 

You are asking a very good question. I don't know how to cross date and location in a search, and that would be very useful.

[+ Axiom2001]

Thanks, "Daddy" for bring back the review component!

[+ José Soplanucas]

Send Suggestions to Daddy. He's the keeper of the master list of bugsfeatures. mailto:[email protected]

I will do it the next time, but I guess we can consider this suggestion as delivered. Thank you for everything you do!

[+ Axiom2001]

Hey guys- Be grateful that "Daddy" brought back this major forum. Make the better of what's here, for we've been without reviews for six months and have made it.

Try not to be so friggin' demanding in your requests. If there is a guy with whom you are interested and the reviews don't satisfy you-- then damnit just ask us

here if we have any information. If not, hire the guy of interest and try to "make it work" as positively as possible! If it doesn't work out to your advantage, then

chalk it up as to one that did NOT go as well as you'd desire! Write a review!

[Guy Fawkes]

The beauty of the system something I was taught as a 20-something. "Lies tend to grow; the truth tends to stay the same!"

 

Eventually everybody gets reviewed by well-known reviewers that's useful information. Eventually reviewers become well-known reviewers thats useful information.

 

I value the last year or two of reviews because they tend to reflect the current reality. I value the rest because they show how they developed over the years. I've followed some people for well over a decade.

 

A resounding "Your Welcome!" to you all. I need to get back to work now. I'm working ahead so that I have time to swat bugs on the weekend.

 

My thoughts were along the lines of @OliverSaks' idea that the 60th doesn't trump the other 59. Moreover, if the 60th review were constrained in what it can say because of a new need for a conservative description of what happened, that should not detract from the detail that had been disclosed in the previous 59. I suspect reviewers will adapt to any new writing style and deliver meaningful reviews, even if that takes a little while. @Epigonos has expressed his concerns about the reviews, but I am more confident that they will continue to provide us with a useful description of what escorts can deliver.

[+ pdxleo]

Congrats Daddy- your labors are appreciated more than you could possibly know!

[TruthBTold]

Thanks Daddy. A review be one of the things to be considered when making a decision about the person to hire.

 

I do have a question that I also had regarding the old review system: Is there a way to discern the writer of a review? There are times I read a review and would love to get more information than he was able to provide. I could PM a person in the Forum and they could simply not answer if they wished not to. I could never figure out if there was a way to associate a particular review with a certain person in the Forum.

 

Second, perhaps some time down the line a "Posting Guidelines" could be formulated and be put up so there are some guidelines to follow. Obviously they do not have to be redlines if that is not what is desired by Daddy but could be just something to be read.

https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/posting-guidelines-keep-us-out-of-hot-water.75514/

[Guy Fawkes]

Let's see, lost in a thread that'll end up being a dozen pages long; Or in an email that'll be color coded and I see at least a daily basis. You choose!

 

However, you've already caused me to have an idea... A bug reporting page! That goes straight into my bug system. Thank you my friend! For that went straight to the bug system!

 

I will do it the next time, but I guess we can consider this suggestion as delivered. Thank you for everything you do!

[+ José Soplanucas]

Let's see, lost in a thread that'll end up being a dozen pages long; Or in an email that'll be color coded and I see at least a daily basis. You choose!

 

However, you've already caused me to have an idea... A bug reporting page! That goes straight into my bug system. Thank you my friend! For that it went straight to the bug system!

 

Ok, Ok, I follow your procedure and mail the suggestion to you.