Aaron Lawrence is back . . ..

[jack]

As quickly as he disappeared, Aaron has returned this week. Read all about it at http://www.aaronlawrence.com He promises to tell what he's been up to for the last sex months.

 

It is good that he is back, safely. I had worst-case thoughts about his run in with the Russian mofia when he was filming a year ago in Moscow.

 

Secondly, Hooboy can declare accolades for Aaron better than anybody. The partnership (as it were) between these two advanced them both simultaneously as good and responsible citizens opening up new pathways in a special service that people like me have benefited from.

 

Aaron gave this site a depth and purpose that gave it credibility in a business that is incredibly personal where mutual respect for another's person is paramount. He knew how to do that and shared his experience and knowledge.

 

Can't wait to find out what he's been doing and why he left in a jiffy.

 

;-)

[bigguyinpasadena]

This has been discussed already

http://babydb.male4malescorts.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=7&topic_id=46030&mesg_id=46030&page=

 

And some do not welcome his return!

[jack]

WOW, Bigguy. I missed that. And I thought I checked for it.

 

Had I seen the origianl that you sent me to, I would not have entered anything -- it being the type of conversation I disregard for the lack of substance and foundation.

 

Nonetheless, I think my entry is socially responsible for pointing out an entirely different aspect of the Hooboy/Aaron association which has merit for them and for us.

 

For the dialogue in the original announcenment, when you scan it fresh like I just did, you see horrendous sophmoric hype, unadult conversation.

 

The ladies, sans two or three common sense guys, dropped thier knitting to throw mud.

 

Not nice.

 

An insult and disappointing to the fraternal spirit that brings us together.

 

You may remember the huge out cry about Calvin Klein's "under-age" models showing bluggie underwear in magazines and Times Square bill boards that caused Calvin Klein to abandon that motif, unfortunately. Several weeks later it was found out that all the models were, in fact, over eighteen. Hence, Bigguy, all the screamers were seeing what they wanted to see not what was; they wanted to see underage youths.

 

Several guys in the Lounge's first announcement have the same affliction. They are not a distinquished group basing their inuendos on supposition. In fact, they are the ones with personal problems. One person even asked Hooboy to drop Aaron adds because he couldn't engage in a site that featured underage youths. All based on supposition. Like the Calvin Klein group, he's got a problem not us.

 

So, Bigguy, two things: I am confident my submittal is meritorious in the history of male prostitution in the collaborative arrangement between Arron and Hoobody, the high road, compared to the discraceful low road uttered in the previous thread.

[bigguyinpasadena]

"You may remember the huge out cry about Calvin Klein's "under-age" models showing bluggie underwear in magazines and Times Square bill boards that caused Calvin Klein to abandon that motif, unfortunately. Several weeks later it was found out that all the models were, in fact, over eighteen. Hence, Bigguy, all the screamers were seeing what they wanted to see not what was; they wanted to see underage youths."

IMO-there is a world of difference between underfed waif models posing in underwear and putting kids lives at risk via unsafe sex practices for the titalation of a few dirty old perverts.

If you cannot see that then I think your moral house might need some tidying up.

"So, Bigguy, two things: I am confident my submittal is meritorious in the history of male prostitution in the collaborative arrangement between Arron and Hoobody, the high road, compared to the discraceful low road uttered in the previous thread. "

Again-I suspect that your vision of a "high road"and "low road"might be worthy of some personal reflection,I,for one,find it pretty scary.

I am not even refering to the "underage"aspect here-rather the fact that Aaron put his name on a product that endorses the exploitation of young,ill informed,desperate boys so that he could make a buck.In my book that means he has blood on his hands.

If you care to condone such practices by purchasing his products(and those made by the other sleazeballs of the porn world who produce this filth)go ahead.Just don't announce his comeback as if it were the second coming of the christ.

[bigguyinpasadena]

Boston Guy has brought up great point

"

 

 

 

"I agree. I think there's also another legitimate issue: If sexually-oriented pictures of underage guys end up on this site, then those who view the site will end up with those pictures on their own computers.

 

I don't see how any of us could prove that those boys were of legal age if challenged -- which means we could easily be on the wrong end of the law in the unfortunate instance that our own PC's were to become the subject of legal action. "

So if a site should choose to link to Lawerences site-if it run on the same model as before-it is putting its users safty and liberty at risk.I belive Hooboy to be MUCH to savvy to put himself,his buisness partners,and the people who read his site at such risk.

[jack]

Bigguy, you've got a problem.

[guptasa1]

I'm really surprised to see so much discussion of this topic. Now, I certainly haven't seen all of Aaron's stuff, but I haven't seen any I personally find objectionable.

 

Now, my perspective may be a bit different, but I don't see a problem with content IF a model is of legal age and consenting. To me, the issue is a strictly legal one.

 

If we're talking about objecting to models who LOOK like they might be under 18, that's awfully subjective. I have a couple friends, both in their 20's, who could EASILY pass for 16 or 17. In contrast, I know some guys who are 16 or 17 and look like they're in their 20's. There are even a lot of escorts who advertise as 18 or older, but look like they COULD be younger, etc. You simply can't judge someone's age by how they look.

 

I'd also argue that I don't personally think it's fair to judge someone who's attracted to younger looking guys. I happen to be attracted to twinks and younger (legal) guys myself, but that doesn't mean I'd ever harm someone underage, etc.

 

People object to all kinds of things, from gay sex period to fetishes, etc. Right now, there's an ad for a video of a bunch of guys pissing on a younger twinky model being advertised (which I personally find the idea of hot since he's legal and consenting). I think objecting to guys who simply *LOOK* like they could be younger than 18, assuming the person is indeed over 18, is beside the point. It's not hurting the model if he's over 18, and the whole point is to protect people UNDER 18 who might not know what they're getting into, might be emotionally harmed, etc.

 

As to the argument that it attracts child molesters, ehhh - I doubt it - I would imagine they'd be seeking out victims, not hanging around on legal sites. I think there's a big difference between someone who likes being with younger guys and someone who wants to intentionally harm a child by molesting them.

 

Now, as to the barebacking videos, that's another sticky issue. I'm a firm proponent of safer sex. I'd be lying if I said I didn't find the idea of barebacking sexy - I do. But it's very dangerous, I wouldn't do it myself (without time, testing, and an exclusive partner), and I certainly don't think anyone should be pressured or bribed to do it. I have seen some bareback videos before, mostly online, and I hope they are done safely, but have no way to know that and doubt it (and yes, there are ways to ensure barebacking is done with minimum risk where I would say it's acceptable from my point of view, but they involve a period of abstinence, a great deal of time, and comprehensive testing, which PROBABLY is something most studios or models would NOT do - I think they should or even should HAVE to personally to make this type of video).

 

Just my two cents on these subjects. I hope I haven't offended too many people, but I think there's definitely another side to this.

[bigguyinpasadena]

"Bigguy, you've got a problem."

Well that was a well thought out argument!

[Guest zipperzone]

>Several guys in the Lounge's first announcement have the same

>affliction. They are not a distinquished group basing their

>inuendos on supposition. In fact, they are the ones with

>personal problems. One person even asked Hooboy to drop Aaron

>adds because he couldn't engage in a site that featured

>underage youths. All based on supposition. Like the Calvin

>Klein group, he's got a problem not us.

 

In my opinion, the A.L. "problem" has little or nothing to do with models who look to be underage. I'm sure AL is smart enough to have proof of age for all of his "stars"

 

The problem for me is that he advocates barebacking as is evidenced by his videos. That is irresponsible and immoral. If you can't understand that then there's not much point in further discussion

 

>So, Bigguy, two things: I am confident my submittal is

>meritorious in the history of male prostitution in the

>collaborative arrangement between Arron and Hoobody, the high

>road, compared to the discraceful low road uttered in the

>previous thread.

 

Sounds like you think you are the Chair of the Humanities program at an Ivy League university. Got news for you............

[VaHawk]

>The problem for me is that he advocates barebacking as is

>evidenced by his videos. That is irresponsible and immoral. If

>you can't understand that then there's not much point in

>further discussion

 

Right!!! Your personal problem, which, as mind boggling as it might seem to you, is just that!, Your very own personal problem! How wonderful the world would be to you, if everyone had to adhere to your very own personal morals!!!

 

BTW: there is never any point in further discussion with you, as you seem to be closed minded to any discussion whatsoever, and it is wonderful that you realize that.

 

>Sounds like you think you are the Chair of the Humanities

>program at an Ivy League university. Got news for

>you............

 

HA! HA! HA!, what a snotty attitude! One has to be chair at an Ivy League university to have credence? Being a chair at one of the thousands of other universities in the U.S., is less prestigious?

[woodlawn]

> One person even asked Hooboy to drop Aaron

>adds because he couldn't engage in a site that featured

>underage youths. All based on supposition.

 

And what is YOUR position based on? People who assume the models are underage have one piece of evidence they can cite -- the models look very, very young. What evidence can you cite that they are not as young as they look? Well?

 

>

>So, Bigguy, two things: I am confident my submittal is

>meritorious in the history of male prostitution

 

I find myself wondering whether the humor of the above sentence is intentional or unintentional.

[best hotel]

....the point is...aaron lawrence's models are often chosen BECAUSE they look like children...a practice that markets to pedophiles...while aaron is not responsible for the actions of his audience, he is profiting from those who sexually exploit children....from those who do not check IDs...the underage street prostitutes in this country are not living the lives that the escorts that fill these pages live...they are used, abused, robbed, infected, addicted, alone, and many do not live a very long life...aaron's pictures of barely pubescent alleged 18 year olds simply do not belong here ...this is a place for consenting adults, free to exploit themselves and their charms for profit at their will...not those who exploit children, or feed the taste for the exploitation of children.....please excuse the soap box, but my own childhood involved this type of exploitation and i know from where i speak...by the way, i hired aaron once, having never seen his work as a borderline child pornographer at the time and having had no idea he would look that young, ... his appearance of youthfulness really turned me off...but i found him to be a sweet, gracious, pleasant, likeable fellow who treated me better than most escorts...he, himself is quite the professional,...and very adult in demeanor...his book did much to support escorts and i believe that he is an effective consumer advocate for both escorts and clients...i just wish he would film men, not boys...

[Guest zipperzone]

>his book did much

>to support escorts and i believe that he is an effective

>consumer advocate for both escorts and clients...i just wish

>he would film men, not boys...

 

It would also be nice if he bought a few packs

of condoms along the way.

[Guest alanm]

I never hired Aaron, but did have a long talk with him at a book signing a few years ago. Perhaps he shows a diferent side to his clients, but I did not particularly like him. He bragged about doubling his rates for one client who did want to hear about what a tough day Aaron had -- on the client's time. I also thought his book was a rip off of Matt Adams' "hustler, escorts and porn stars." Adams has said that he helped Lawrence on his book and never got a thank you or an acknowledgement.

 

 

The sex must be great, based on what I saw and heard that night, Aaron

is getting away with murder by charging $350 an hour. Can someone please explain in detail what Aaeon is good at except self promotion.

[VaHawk]

LMAO! At least he said you have "A problem"! He could have been less generous and said something "arguably" more truthful?

 

Ro si hatt lturtfhu? Xesuec em! Rvoe vife cktoalics ghnitnot! :-(

[woodlawn]

>I also thought his book was a rip off of Matt Adams'

>"hustler, escorts and porn stars." Adams has said that he

>helped Lawrence on his book and never got a thank you or an

>acknowledgement.

 

This thread is just chock full of unintentional humor. The Adams book is little more than a series of sweeping, grandiose claims about the business for which there is no authority provided except the author's word, and it reads as though written by someone who flunked his high school English classes. Saying you helped produce that book is a bit like saying you helped to steer the Titanic.

 

>The sex must be great, based on what I saw and heard that

>night, Aaron

>is getting away with murder by charging $350 an hour. Can

>someone please explain in detail what Aaeon is good at except

>self promotion.

 

Apparently he is good at conning people like you into reading his claptrap and even showing up at his book signings. Why did you go -- wasn't the TVLand network showing 'Gilligan's Island' that night?

[VaHawk]

>Saying you helped produce that book is a bit like

>saying you helped to steer the Titanic.

 

Funny analogy - no one could dispute that! But, did I miss something?? Where did any poster on this thread say he "helped produce" that book?

 

>Apparently he is good at conning people like you into reading

>his claptrap and even showing up at his book signings. Why

>did you go -- wasn't the TVLand network showing 'Gilligan's

>Island' that night?

 

Actually, TVLand was showing the 1,000th repeat of that talking "ho"rse Mr. Ed! :7

[woodlawn]

>>Saying you helped produce that book is a bit like

>>saying you helped to steer the Titanic.

>

>Funny analogy - no one could dispute that! But, did I miss

>something?? Where did any poster on this thread say he

>"helped produce" that book?

 

I was responding to an assertion by a poster that Lawrence told him he helped Adams with the book.

 

>

>Actually, TVLand was showing the 1,000th repeat of that

>talking "ho"rse Mr. Ed! :7

 

I stand corrected.

[Guest alanm]

Hey woodlawn,

 

I usually find your sarcastic responses to my posting funny, but not this time. Your response was made simply for the sake of getting the last word in (as always). It was pointless. I do not even care about which book was better, Lawrence's or Adams'. HooBoy came along and made the question moot. But, true to form, when I check this site tomorrow, there will be yet another response -- this time to this message. Get a life.

[Rick Munroe]

Instead of Aaron Lawrence, let's change the topic to Joey Lawrence. Is he a fucking hunk or what? :9

 

http://www.homensbonitos.hpg.ig.com.br/joeylawrence/joey030.jpg

[woodlawn]

>Hey woodlawn,

 

That's 'Mr. Woodlawn' to you, junior.

 

 

>I usually find your sarcastic responses to my posting funny,

>but not this time.

 

Who gives a shit? In two recent threads you posted gratuitously insulting remarks to me even though I had done nothing to provoke you. For that reason, in future I'll be paying more attention to your posts than usual (usual being zero). Get used to it. You don't have a choice.

 

And while you're still awake, check your dictionary for the correct definition of 'sarcastic.' You obviously don't know what the word means.

 

> But,

>true to form, when I check this site tomorrow, there will be

>yet another response -- this time to this message. Get a

>life.

 

If you have such a full life, why the fuck are you constantly checking this site for my posts? Grow up. Even at your age, it isn't too late.

[+ Lucky]

Rick, you are so devious! Your post really causes one to think of the Lawrence brothers. But we cannot, since Andy is underage.

How old is Matthew Lawrence? I think he is cute, although Joey is hunkier.

[+ deej]

>let's change the topic to Joey Lawrence

 

And also let's remember that he actually changed his working name. His SAG card now says "Joseph Lawrence".

 

So the next time you're tempted to look down and say "Joey, watch the teeth", remind yourself that it's JOSEPH. :+

 

(credit to Billy Masters for phrasing the admonishment just so. ;-))

[FourAces]

>Rick, you are so devious! Your post really causes one to

>think of the Lawrence brothers. But we cannot, since Andy is

>underage.

>How old is Matthew Lawrence?

 

He is 24 born Feb. 11 1980.

 

Joseph and Matthew are very hot :9

 

RT

[BewareofNick]

You mean this Matthew Lawrence?

 

http://www.celebritywonder.com/mp/2002_The_Hot_Chick/HC_Matthew_Lawrence_005.jpg