411 on Trophyhusband

[rvwnsd]

Excellent analysis! Given the style, I momentarily flashbacked to FFF and Rockhard who oft employed this method when they de-constructed forum posts.

 

Thank you.

 

I have to say that I initially thought the review was a bit too vague but after reading the analysis I have changed my mind. It is in fact quite an informative review. Based on the review, I will be taking TH off of my "To Do" list for now.

 

See - it was useful. Helped you avoid a hiring mistake.

 

While I would like more detail to confirm, I'm pretty sure after reading the review that this escort is a straight guy whose repertoire is too limited to be of interest to me.

 

The mention of 'chemistry' is also troublesome. While anyone can have bad chemistry, you don't really hear about it being a limiting factor so much in the star escorts on this Forum like Juan Bruno, Alec Andrews, or Mike Gaite.

 

I don't see why the mention of "chemistry" is troublesome to you. The entire hiring experience relies on chemistry. I would guess that forum posters would not make anything but glowing comments about the various "star escorts" due to the expected backlash that would occur if they did. That is not to say the guys you listed are anything but stellar, but it is to say that forum favorites are looked upon differently than other guys.

 

PS: I put "star escorts" in quotes because I don't think the listed escorts would consider themselves to be stars.

[Tigger]

You're quite right, while chemistry from the client's end can be an issue, chemistry from the escort's side should never be. The top escorts you cite are unlikely to have chemistry issues with clients, they know how to do the business. Of course it's possible that a client may not think it clicks. It's entirely possible that some escorts would not be 'into' a particular client, and the client would be entitled to report that in a review. But they need to remember that chemistry is a two-way street.

 

Thank you.

 

 

 

See - it was useful. Helped you avoid a hiring mistake.

 

 

 

I don't see why the mention of "chemistry" is troublesome to you. The entire hiring experience relies on chemistry. I would guess that forum posters would not make anything but glowing comments about the various "star escorts" due to the expected backlash that would occur if they did. That is not to say the guys you listed are anything but stellar, but it is to say that forum favorites are looked upon differently than other guys.

 

PS: I put "star escorts" in quotes because I don't think the listed escorts would consider themselves to be stars.

 

I wouldn't say chemistry on the part of the escort is never a concern. But haven't I read Juan Bruno and other 'stellar' escorts remark that there is usually something they can concentrate on with most clients that helps them 'break the ice' whether it's a nice smile, engaging personality, etc.

[rvwnsd]

I wouldn't say chemistry on the part of the escort is never a concern. But haven't I read Juan Bruno and other 'stellar' escorts remark that there is usually something they can concentrate on with most clients that helps them 'break the ice' whether it's a nice smile, engaging personality, etc.

Yes, you have. But that is different than a client having a so-so time with an escort because there isn't chemistry or communication going awry because a prospective client's communications are off-putting for some reason. I believe we have read where stellar escorts have discussed client communications they have not been happy with. It happens and there's nothing wrong with it in my opinion.

[Tigger]

Yes, you have. But that is different than a client having a so-so time with an escort because there isn't chemistry or communication going awry because a prospective client's communications are off-putting for some reason. I believe we have read where stellar escorts have discussed client communications they have not been happy with. It happens and there's nothing wrong with it in my opinion.

 

You're missing my point. When a review has to explicitly state that 'interaction with TH will very much depend on the ol' "chemistry" thing', in my opinion that's a red flag. It does not give me a good feeling at all about an escort. The best escorts work with the client. This sounds to me like a warning that it's very possible for him and the client not to be compatible. But I am not surprised by the statement. It goes along with the vibe I got from his ad

[Bart]

Reviews in post-RB times are going to very sanitized versions of what they were in past. Azdr's review was very much in line with who Azdr hires and what his interests are. That is why it is of equal importance to read reviewers description and look at the reviews he has posted. Almost all of the concerns about whether TH is real or not on this thread have been answered.

 

To Tigger's point on Chemistry I could not agree more. As a long time reader and who does hire frequently, Chemistry as stated in this review goes right to a key point for a lot of people, kissing. Not unusual for an escort who is newer or bi or straight, kissing a guy is foreign to the escort. For me, like Tigger this is probably a deal breaker for me, but it may be worth the time just to have the conversation about what activities are available and what is not. I will say in the old days when you could list activities, if kissing was not on the list, I would not even attempt the contact.

 

In the end we now know from a very valid resource that TH is real and looks like pics but further communication is required to see if there is a fit.

[geminibear]

Reviews in post-RB times are going to very sanitized versions of what they were in past. Azdr's review was very much in line with who Azdr hires and what his interests are. That is why it is of equal importance to read reviewers description and look at the reviews he has posted. Almost all of the concerns about whether TH is real or not on this thread have been answered.

 

To Tigger's point on Chemistry I could not agree more. As a long time reader and who does hire frequently, Chemistry as stated in this review goes right to a key point for a lot of people, kissing. Not unusual for an escort who is newer or bi or straight, kissing a guy is foreign to the escort. For me, like Tigger this is probably a deal breaker for me, but it may be worth the time just to have the conversation about what activities are available and what is not. I will say in the old days when you could list activities, if kissing was not on the list, I would not even attempt the contact.

 

In the end we now know from a very valid resource that TH is real and looks like pics but further communication is required to see if there is a fit.

+1

 

Well put Bart.

[Guest countryboywny]

This is an excellent thread! adzr's review told me everything I would want to know before contacting the escort. He looks like his pics, he is legit, he's a good guy etc. As far as "chemistry" well, that's purely subjective and depends on the participants.

 

I don't detail particular activities in any review that I write. It's because the discussion of such things in public lessens my own enjoyment of what occured.

[TruHart1]

This is an excellent thread! adzr's review told me everything I would want to know before contacting the escort. He looks like his pics, he is legit, he's a good guy etc. As far as "chemistry" well, that's purely subjective and depends on the participants.

 

I don't detail particular activities in any review that I write. It's because the discussion of such things in public lessens my own enjoyment of what occured.

I completely agree with you countryboy, except for your last statement concerning sharing the graphic details. Since the review policy changes here and on RentMen after the RB shutdown, I have missed being able to share all the "details!" I am just the opposite and feel that by being super descriptive in my reviews of so many of the excellent men I have been privileged to meet, that I almost get to relive the excitement I felt with each escort when I wrote their reviews! In addition, I have a record of just what I experienced on Daddy's review page I can go back and read myself in a few years if I want.

 

Of course, I will adhere to the new policies...it may even make me a more creative writer in trying to express my sexual ecstasy in less graphic detail, but if I'm honest, I think I am an unapologetic porn writer by nature!

 

TruHart1

[borgerback]

I had a very pleasant and polite email exchange with TH last month. I'm sorry it has not yet worked out to meet with him. However, as to azdr's review, I'm also NOT into kissing or anal, so this was good news for me, but I can see how it would be bad news for others, vis a vis this particular escort. I will say, TH was open to some of my interests when he responded to my emails . . .

[+ glennnn]

I Think it is strange.... One of my abidng fantasies us to seduce a straight guy. You know, the hot guy at the gym, the lonely soldier, the young married stud at the bar who cums over to our team, because he just can't resist my moves. And yet, I'm put off by an escort who lists himself as straight! I'm afraid he will just drop his pants, kick back, point and say, "Help yourself, and notify me when your done." I would feel denigrated and cheap, think.

 

Am I missing something here regarding hiring straight guys?

[Rudynate]

You're missing my point. When a review has to explicitly state that 'interaction with TH will very much depend on the ol' "chemistry" thing', in my opinion that's a red flag. It does not give me a good feeling at all about an escort. The best escorts work with the client. This sounds to me like a warning that it's very possible for him and the client not to be compatible. But I am not surprised by the statement. It goes along with the vibe I got from his ad

 

 

But isn't he just saying that TH may not be for everybody? Maybe the reviewer meant chemistry on the part of the client, rather than chemistry on the part of the escort. The fact that he's mostly straight and appears to perform well with men would suggest that chemistry isn't a problem for him.

 

The thing about the review that would send up a red flag for me was " I'm not much into kissing or anal with anybody and I had a fantastic time with TH." That might suggest that the escort's repertoire is limited and that you should keep your expectations low.

 

Nonetheless, I think TH is a total stud and I wouldn't be surprised to find that he's a very sweet guy.

[Epigonos]

As far as I'm concerned the guy’s ad and azdr0710's review provide me with all the information I require. I NEVER hire straight guys and I NEVER hire guys who aren't enthusiastic kissers. With this information I know Trophyhusband and I are definitely NOT a fit.

[DaddyCub]

To make a clarification.

 

I contacted him via the Rentmen e-mail system and during our exchange I expressed I was looking for a passionate BFE with intensive deep kissing and me bottoming. He replied that he knew exactly what I was looking for and could take care of everything I needed.

 

This would indicate that kissing and anal are not his limitations but the client who was posting.

[+ azdr0710]

To make a clarification.

 

I contacted him via the Rentmen e-mail system and during our exchange I expressed I was looking for a passionate BFE with intensive deep kissing and me bottoming. He replied that he knew exactly what I was looking for and could take care of everything I needed.

 

This would indicate that kissing and anal are not his limitations but the client who was posting.

 

 

THANK YOU, DaddyCub!......as I noted in my review's "stats" section, kissing and topping are very much possibilities with TH.....they just aren't with me!.....

Edited December 12, 2015 by azdr0710

[Tigger]

You're missing my point. When a review has to explicitly state that 'interaction with TH will very much depend on the ol' "chemistry" thing', in my opinion that's a red flag. It does not give me a good feeling at all about an escort. The best escorts work with the client. This sounds to me like a warning that it's very possible for him and the client not to be compatible. But I am not surprised by the statement. It goes along with the vibe I got from his ad

 

But isn't he just saying that TH may not be for everybody? Maybe the reviewer meant chemistry on the part of the client, rather than chemistry on the part of the escort. The fact that he's mostly straight and appears to perform well with men would suggest that chemistry isn't a problem for him.

 

I think this thread has gone on so long that maybe you missed my point too. The point I was making was that tone of the review plus the tone of TH's ad indicate to me he is not really an escort for everyone.

 

Having looked at several of Azdr's reviews, I'm getting the feeling that many of the guys he really likes might not be escorts that a large majority of us would like. I'm sure Azdr has met many escorts that a majority would like. But since Azdr's interests do not encompass kissing and intercourse, he is going to like guys that many of us would probably classify as only minimally to moderately interactive. These are the kind of niches that straight escorts would often be expected to occupy. And Azdr has mentioned he doesn't mind seeing straight escorts.

[Rudynate]

I think this thread has gone on so long that maybe you missed my point too. The point I was making was that tone of the review plus the tone of TH's ad indicate to me he is not really an escort for everyone.

 

Having looked at several of Azdr's reviews, I'm getting the feeling that many of the guys he really likes might not be escorts that a large majority of us would like. I'm sure Azdr has met many escorts that a majority would like. But since Azdr's interests do not encompass kissing and intercourse, he is going to like guys that many of us would probably classify as only minimally to moderately interactive. These are the kind of niches that straight escorts would often be expected to occupy. And Azdr has mentioned he doesn't mind seeing straight escorts.

 

I don't think I have ever seen a straight escort. I'm very curious, though, and probably will at some time. He would have to be someone who is fully interactive though - I like it all, the more the better. Because TH appears to be fully interactive, he might be a good candidate.

[mattr]

I wonder if he knows how much interest he has generated in the forum?

[BabyBoomer]

I wonder if he knows how much interest he has generated in the forum?

 

Someone with this screen name joined the forum last Friday.

 

Wehotrophyhusband

 

~Boomer ~

[mattr]

Someone with this screen name joined the forum last Friday.

 

Wehotrophyhusband

 

~Boomer ~

Interesting... I hope he starts interacting on the site....

[rvwnsd]

...The thing about the review that would send up a red flag for me was " I'm not much into kissing or anal with anybody and I had a fantastic time with TH." That might suggest that the escort's repertoire is limited and that you should keep your expectations low....

 

I don't understand why you would jump to that conclusion. azdr said that he (azdr) is not into kissing and anal. He didn't say that the escort wasn't. In fact, the "stats" section indicates the escort is into kissing.

 

As far as I'm concerned the guy’s ad and azdr0710's review provide me with all the information I require. I NEVER hire straight guys and I NEVER hire guys who aren't enthusiastic kissers. With this information I know Trophyhusband and I are definitely NOT a fit.

 

Nowhere in that review does it say TH is not an enthusiastic kisser. It says azdr is not into kissing. Would anyone find it acceptable if azdr wrote that he does not like kissing but despite knowing that the escort enthusiastically kissed him anyway?

 

This is why I ask the escort for his thoughts on what I like to do and why I do not rely heavily on reviews when determining whether an escort is a match. If I love to get off by licking KFC cole slaw out of an escort's buttcrack, he agrees to do it, and I write a review about it does that help anyone who prefers their cole slaw served in a bowl?

[borgerback]

I for one would say no thanks to cole slaw regardless of where it was served.

[bimbosavant]

There is a thin, wavering line between discretion and full disclosure - but the bottom one is: to each his own.

 

 

xoxoXXX

 

-Andre

[Tigger]

There is a thin, wavering line between discretion and full disclosure - but the bottom one is: to each his own.

 

 

xoxoXXX

 

-Andre

 

Yes, but too much discretion makes a review worthless.

[bimbosavant]

My reference is a bit twofold in that the amount of information the escort puts out can hinder or help a client decide. There are a lot of facets to selling oneself that runs the gamut of many marketing tactics. Some people under certain circumstances are a bit wary of divulging a lot of information and/or are much better in the flesh. Others are very meticulous and downright vile (in a good way) in proposing what they have to offer and are great at articulating that and presenting visual aides. Having lived in Europe where nothing is illegal, comparing these things to how they are demonstrated here in America is quite fascinating.

[+ FreshFluff]

There is a thin, wavering line between discretion and full disclosure - but the bottom one is: to each his own.

 

 

xoxoXXX

 

-Andre

 

I'm not sure if you're right or wrong, but I love your username.