Jump to content

C'list Post Looks Familiar ???


Will Do
This topic is 3914 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Yes, they are. I call BS on the Craigslist ad. If the ad was actually posted by Tony looking for off-the-clock hookups where he needs to be "discreet" because he's not out to his brother whom he's visiting, why would he use such recognizable photos?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Columbus, Georgia.

 

Looks familiar? Free? For masculine and muscular?

 

http://columbusga.craigslist.org/m4m/4017537953.html

 

 

 

 

 

Good job, Sherlock. You no doubt saved someone a lot of disappointment if the person believed the scam.

-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Rentboy ad lists him as being in Columbus, GA. (yuk)

 

 

what is "yuk" about that?...and what does this mean?....that it really is Serrano and he really is visiting Columbus, GA?....is he looking both for rentboy hookups and DL free hookups (maybe with a Ft. Benning stud who can't afford to pay)?....or are both ads not from him at all?......sorry to be so dense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Columbus, Georgia is yuk.

 

Just saying.......................Personally, I would be pissed if I fit the muscular and masculine requirements and had already shelled out his $150 per hour hiring him THEN came across the C'list post.

 

We must all realize the fee is charged to fat-ass glumps of ugly-faced flesh.

 

Beauties get it for free, looks like!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've had conversations with escorts before who have alluded to having had freebie encounters in addition to their escorting work. (If this is indeed the case going on here, which looks like it might be).

 

And it makes sense -- they generally have sex with guys like me (someone whose looks preclude him from being able to make a living this way) and probably want to sometimes play with guys who look good enough to be an escort if they wanted.

 

On top of that, they probably would enjoy encounters where they don't have to take the clients' wishes into consideration. I'm sure what a free sex partner wants and expects vs. what a client wants and expects are two different processes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problem (for what that's worth) with escorts wanting and trying to get some on the side.

 

The issue in my mind is that, to me, it seems not legit to advertise for free and for compensation in the same locale. Maybe I'm crazy.

 

It would seem to me that if you were to know of the man and his escort side and asked him: "You charging $150/hr for it like you advertise on Rentmen.com? Or is this a freebie?"

 

He might just respond thusly: "It really depends on the person responding to my posting on CL man."

 

Who / what type of guy makes the cut? How is that cut determined?

 

Reply to the C'list posting and be told he'll do you for $75?

 

You're not good enough to be free but not bad enough to be charged the entire fee?

 

Blurred lines...........................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problem with someone posting a hook-up ad in the same location where they are escorting. If someone escorts where they normally live, are they not supposed to ever look for recreational sex online? Seems like that expectation is rather extreme. Why shouldn't an escort be able to have a sex life outside his work, whether he finds his tricks online or somewhere in public?

 

As to who would decide whether it's free or whether it's paid time, I assume the following:

 

1. If you contact the guy based on a CL ad (that isn't clearly a for-hire ad), then you should assume the encounter will be at no cost -- IF, and this is a big IF, the guy is interested in you. If he isn't, then expect rejection.

 

2. If you contact the guy based on his ad on Rentboy or the like, then expect to pay -- even if you think you're hot and that the escort would have sex with you for free if you met in another way.

 

As to being offered a reduced fee after contacting someone via Craigslist, I suppose one could interpret it as "not hot enough for free sex, but hot enough for a reduced rate." There is another possibility, though, and that is that the guy is actually willing to work for a reduced rate but just doesn't want that listed where he advertises for work. Quite frankly, though, this scenario would turn me away. It's one thing to contact someone who's posting on CL who is obviously looking for someone "generous;" it's quite another to be propositioned when you weren't expecting it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problem with someone posting a hook-up ad in the same location where they are escorting. If someone escorts where they normally live, are they not supposed to ever look for recreational sex online? Seems like that expectation is rather extreme. Why shouldn't an escort be able to have a sex life outside his work, whether he finds his tricks online or somewhere in public?

 

As to who would decide whether it's free or whether it's paid time, I assume the following:

 

1. If you contact the guy based on a CL ad (that isn't clearly a for-hire ad), then you should assume the encounter will be at no cost -- IF, and this is a big IF, the guy is interested in you. If he isn't, then expect rejection.

 

2. If you contact the guy based on his ad on Rentboy or the like, then expect to pay -- even if you think you're hot and that the escort would have sex with you for free if you met in another way.

 

As to being offered a reduced fee after contacting someone via Craigslist, I suppose one could interpret it as "not hot enough for free sex, but hot enough for a reduced rate." There is another possibility, though, and that is that the guy is actually willing to work for a reduced rate but just doesn't want that listed where he advertises for work. Quite frankly, though, this scenario would turn me away. It's one thing to contact someone who's posting on CL who is obviously looking for someone "generous;" it's quite another to be propositioned when you weren't expecting it.

 

+1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As to being offered a reduced fee after contacting someone via Craigslist, I suppose one could interpret it as "not hot enough for free sex, but hot enough for a reduced rate." There is another possibility, though, and that is that the guy is actually willing to work for a reduced rate but just doesn't want that listed where he advertises for work. Quite frankly, though, this scenario would turn me away. It's one thing to contact someone who's posting on CL who is obviously looking for someone "generous;" it's quite another to be propositioned when you weren't expecting it.

I only have issues with this last hypothetical. When I hire, I'm expecting certain services as part of the negotiation. If I'm 'accepted as a date at a reduced fee', how do I know I'm going to get what I am buying?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well done and agreed. And in any case, how did the reduced rate scenario come into play?

 

I have no problem with someone posting a hook-up ad in the same location where they are escorting. If someone escorts where they normally live, are they not supposed to ever look for recreational sex online? Seems like that expectation is rather extreme. Why shouldn't an escort be able to have a sex life outside his work, whether he finds his tricks online or somewhere in public?

 

As to who would decide whether it's free or whether it's paid time, I assume the following:

 

1. If you contact the guy based on a CL ad (that isn't clearly a for-hire ad), then you should assume the encounter will be at no cost -- IF, and this is a big IF, the guy is interested in you. If he isn't, then expect rejection.

 

2. If you contact the guy based on his ad on Rentboy or the like, then expect to pay -- even if you think you're hot and that the escort would have sex with you for free if you met in another way.

 

As to being offered a reduced fee after contacting someone via Craigslist, I suppose one could interpret it as "not hot enough for free sex, but hot enough for a reduced rate." There is another possibility, though, and that is that the guy is actually willing to work for a reduced rate but just doesn't want that listed where he advertises for work. Quite frankly, though, this scenario would turn me away. It's one thing to contact someone who's posting on CL who is obviously looking for someone "generous;" it's quite another to be propositioned when you weren't expecting it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know for sure that Tony Serrano has had profiles for free hook ups. Actually I contacted him a few years ago in a website (manhunt?), he replied, he was actually interested (yes!), but eventually we (he..) backed up because we were both looking for a top! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was simply responding to Will Do's post where the was wondering how contacting an escort via a hook-up ad might play out, and he suggested a scenario where the escort asked for a reduced fee.

 

Note that none of my comments are about Tony specifically. I still don't even think it's clear whether, in this case, Tony is advertising as both a Rentboy and a CL hookup. Now that we know he's in the city where both listings are placed, I suppose that increases the odds that the CL post is Tony's. That being said, someone could have simply seen that Tony was going to be in his area and decided to pilfer some of his photos hoping to score hotter guys in response to his CL ad. The thing that still doesn't make sense to me is why Tony would use such recognizable photos in the CL ad if, in fact, he placed that ad.

 

Well done and agreed. And in any case, how did the reduced rate scenario come into play?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I live close enough to one of Georgia's armpits - Columbus - to travel for a full price, reduced rate or, doubtful, free hook-up with Mr. Serrano the following exchange through C'list is true-to-life.:

 

 

"You charging $150/hr for it like you advertise on Rentmen.com? Or is this a freebie?"

 

"It really depends on the person responding to my posting on CL man."

 

 

Take that for what it's worth. I'm done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for clarifying.

 

I was simply responding to Will Do's post where the was wondering how contacting an escort via a hook-up ad might play out, and he suggested a scenario where the escort asked for a reduced fee.

 

Note that none of my comments are about Tony specifically. I still don't even think it's clear whether, in this case, Tony is advertising as both a Rentboy and a CL hookup. Now that we know he's in the city where both listings are placed, I suppose that increases the odds that the CL post is Tony's. That being said, someone could have simply seen that Tony was going to be in his area and decided to pilfer some of his photos hoping to score hotter guys in response to his CL ad. The thing that still doesn't make sense to me is why Tony would use such recognizable photos in the CL ad if, in fact, he placed that ad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The issue in my mind is that, to me, it seems not legit to advertise for free and for compensation in the same locale. Maybe I'm crazy.

 

I see nothing wrong with having a professional ad on Rentboy along with an ad for "free hook-ups" in the same city. We, escorts, are human beings too and we have sexual desires and needs that sometimes can be met through work and sometimes not.

 

Blurred lines...........................

 

Stick with us, Will Do. It gets better with time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a client, and could not agree more. I have no issue with an escort seeking sexual encounters of a personal nature, online or otherwise. Moreover, Tony enjoys overwhelmingly positive reviews here on Daddys (and perhaps elsewhere), and that's enough for this client. Frankly, I hope he has luck, as it seems his location is a something of a challenge to him regarding hook-ups. And in any case, Tony certainly doesn't need my approval! I post solely to contribute my opinion on the subject in general.

 

I see nothing wrong with having a professional ad on Rentboy along with an ad for "free hook-ups" in the same city. We, escorts, are human beings too and we have sexual desires and needs that sometimes can be met through work and sometimes not.[/color]

 

 

 

Stick with us, Will Do. It gets better with time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah, thanks but no thanks.

 

As stated previously:

 

As I live close enough to one of Georgia's armpits - Columbus - to travel for a full price, reduced rate or, doubtful, free hook-up with Mr. Serrano the following exchange through C'list is true-to-life.:

 

 

Me: "You charging $150/hr for it like you advertise on Rentmen.com? Or is this a freebie?"

 

Him: "It really depends on the person responding to my posting on CL man."

 

 

How is fee or no fee determined?

 

I suppose I'm being hard-headed but I can't see the legitimacy in all this.

 

Take that for what it's worth. I'm done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...